[Online support groups for patients with prostate cancer]. / Internetforen für Patienten mit Prostatakrebs.

BACKGROUND: Online support groups are discussion boards on the internet in which users exchange experience, advice and information. The Bundesverband Prostatakrebs Selbsthilfe e. V. (BPS) operates the largest German-language internet forum for prostate cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Several aspects of the BPS Forum were examined: content analysis, language use and interaction, influence on treatment decisions, comparison with conventional face-to-face support groups, and use by relatives and friends. RESULTS: The online support group is dominated by a tentative style of communication with reserved language features. In addition to the exchange of information, emotional support seems to be very welcome to many users and represents an essential part of the exchange. The use of the internet forum leads to a change in the initial treatment decision in 29 % of patients. In comparison with the general population, rates of patients with anxiety and depression were two to three times as high among the users. Compared with the patients themselves, family members in particular had higher values for anxiety and depression and described a higher rate of metastatic diseases in the patients known to them. Users of the online support group were younger, had a higher educational level and a higher income than participants in conventional face-to-face support groups. CONCLUSIONS: Online support groups are rated positively by their users and contribute to the acquisition of information and emotional support. They probably have a significant influence on the primary treatment decision and thus actively shape the reality of care for prostate cancer patients.

Online support groups offer low-threshold backing for family and friends of patients with prostate cancer.

A prostate cancer diagnosis affects not only the patients but also their family and friends. We performed a secondary analysis of a survey of users of the largest German online support group (OSG) for prostate cancer. We collected socio-demographic, psychological and disease-related data over a three-month period in 2013. Among 769 participants with a complete questionnaire, 686 were patients, and 83 were family members and friends of other patients. The family and friends group comprised 33% spouses, 31% children and 36% people with other relationships to the patient ("others"). Compared to the patient group, the family and friends group showed higher scores for anxiety and depression and described a higher rate of metastatic disease in the patients with whom they had a relationship. The children of patients showed the highest psychological burden based on their scores for anxiety and depression. Only 7% of spouses and none of the children attended face-to-face support groups, compared to 70% of people in the "others" group. OSGs offer low-threshold support for family members and friends; specifically, they meet the needs of spouses and children who do not attend face-to-face support groups. To improve counselling efforts, physicians should be aware of this online resource.

Face-to-face vs. online peer support groups for prostate cancer: A cross-sectional comparison study.

BACKGROUND: As social media are evolving rapidly online support groups (OSG) are becoming increasingly important for patients. Therefore, the aim of our study was to compare the users of traditional face-to-face support groups and OSG. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional comparison study of all regional face-to-face support groups and the largest OSG in Germany. By applying validated instruments, the survey covered sociodemographic and disease-related information, decision-making habits, psychological aspects, and quality of life. RESULTS: We analyzed the complete data of 955 patients visiting face-to-face support groups and 686 patients using OSG. Patients using OSG were 6 years younger (65.3 vs. 71.5 years; p < 0.001), had higher education levels (47 vs. 21%; p < 0.001), and had higher income. Patients using OSG reported a higher share of metastatic disease (17 vs. 12%; p < 0.001). Patients using OSG reported greater distress. There were no significant differences in anxiety, depression, and global quality of life. In the face-to-face support groups, patient ratings were better for exchanging information, gaining recognition, and caring for others. Patients using OSG demanded a more active role in the treatment decision-making process (58 vs. 33%; p < 0.001) and changed their initial treatment decision more frequently (29 vs. 25%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Both modalities of peer support received very positive ratings by their users and have significant impact on treatment decision-making. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Older patients might benefit more from the continuous social support in face-to-face support groups. OSG offer low-threshold advice for acute problems to younger and better educated patients with high distress. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.germanctr.de , number DRKS00005086.

The effect of an online support group on patients׳ treatment decisions for localized prostate cancer: An online survey.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effect of an online support group (OSG) on the final treatment decision for localized prostate cancer. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional descriptive study of the largest German prostate cancer OSG between July and October 2013. The online survey comprised 127 questions covering sociodemographic and disease-related information, decision-making habits, health-related quality of life, distress, depression, and anxiety. The primary outcome was to measure the effect of an OSG on the final treatment decision. RESULTS: We analyzed the completed questionnaires from 686 patients with prostate cancer, 200 (29.2%) of whom revised their initial treatment decision. After revising their decisions, these patients more frequently underwent external beam radiation therapy (44.5% vs. 36.4%, P = 0.048) and active surveillance (10.5% vs. 3.7%, P<0.001) and less frequently underwent radical prostatectomy (52.5% vs. 74.9%, P<0.001). Engaging longer in the OSG, demanding a more active role in the decision-making process, and participating in a conventional support group were independently associated with revision of the initial treatment decision. CONCLUSIONS: Of all patients participating in the OSG, 29.2% revised their initial treatment decision. We estimate that this phenomenon may affect 17,000 patients with prostate cancer in the United States of America every year. This finding highlights the importance of OSGs for the health care system. The patient׳s desired degree of involvement in decision-making should be routinely clarified to adjust counseling accordingly. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.germanctr.de, number DRKS00005086.