Tibial Nerve Stimulation for Urge Urinary Incontinence and Overactive Bladder: Narrative Review of Randomized Controlled Trials and Applicability to Implantable Devices.

The tibial nerve is an established target for neuromodulation in the management of overactive bladder (OAB) and its associated symptoms, including urge urinary incontinence (UUI). Technologies are currently available to deliver tibial nerve stimulation (TNS) through percutaneous devices or through implantable devices. The benefits and safety of percutaneous TNS have led to it as a guideline-recommended therapy. However, patient compliance is limited by the burden of weekly office visits and the need for maintenance treatments. Further, insurance often only covers a limited number of lifetime visits for percutaneous TNS. These factors and others have led to the development, study, and utilization of implantable TNS devices. Implantable TNS devices deliver the same therapeutic mechanism of action for nerve stimulation with a permanent implanted device that provides at-home stimulation rather than in-office therapy delivery. Additionally, there is an added potential for dynamic and patient-centered stimulation. There is a large body of high-quality evidence published for TNS, including numerous randomized controlled trials published on percutaneous TNS which have consistently demonstrated superior efficacy to sham and similar efficacy to that of anticholinergic medications. Percutaneous TNS also performs better than conservative therapy including pelvic floor muscle training. The percutaneous and implantable approaches deliver nerve stimulation to the same target nerve, using the same mechanism of action. Therefore, data from randomized trials of percutaneous TNS are informative for implantable TNS devices. At the time of this article's publication, at least two implantable TNS devices have received marketing authorization from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The objective of this review is to discuss the mechanism of action for TNS and summarize the published literature from clinical trials of percutaneous TNS as a foundation of high-quality evidence for implantable devices targeting the tibial nerve.

Efficacy and safety of an alternative onabotulinumtoxinA injection paradigm for refractory overactive bladder.

AIMS: In studies utilizing a 20-injection-site paradigm of onabotulinumtoxinA treatment for overactive bladder (OAB), some patients performed clean intermittent catheterization (CIC). An alternative injection paradigm of fewer injections targeting the lower bladder may reduce the need for CIC by maintaining upper bladder function. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of an unapproved alternative 10-injection-site paradigm targeting the lower bladder. METHODS: In this phase 4, double-blind, parallel-group study, patients with OAB and urinary incontinence (UI) for ≥6 months with ≥3 episodes of urinary urgency incontinence (no more than 1 UI-free day) and ≥8 micturitions per day over 3 days during screening were randomized 2:1 to onabotulinumtoxinA 100 U or placebo injected at 10 sites in the lower bladder. RESULTS: Of 120 patients, 78 in the onabotulinumtoxinA group and 39 in the placebo group had efficacy assessments. In the double-blind phase, mean change from baseline at week 12 in daily frequency of UI episodes was greater with onabotulinumtoxinA (-2.9) versus placebo (-0.3) (least squares mean difference [LSMD]: -2.99, p < 0.0001). Achievement of 100% (odds ratio [OR]: 6.15 [95% confidence interval, CI: 0.75-50.37]), ≥75% (OR: 7.25 [2.00-26.29]), and ≥50% improvement (OR: 4.79 [1.87-12.28]) from baseline in UI episodes was greater with onabotulinumtoxinA versus placebo. Reductions from baseline in the daily average number of micturitions (LSMD: -2.24, p < 0.0001), nocturia (LSMD: -0.71, p = 0.0004), and urgency (LSMD: -2.56, p < 0.0001) were greater with onabotulinumtoxinA than with placebo. Treatment benefit was improved or greatly improved in the onabotulinumtoxinA group (74.0% of patients) versus placebo (17.6%) (OR: 13.03 [95% CI: 3.23-52.57]). Mean change from baseline in Incontinence Quality of Life score was greater with onabotulinumtoxinA versus placebo (LSMD: 24.2, p = 0.0012). Two of 78 (2.6%) patients in the onabotulinumtoxinA group used CIC during the double-blind period; no females used CIC during the double-blind period. Commonly reported adverse events (≥5%) were urinary tract infection (UTI), dysuria, and productive cough for both groups; rate of UTI was higher with onabotulinumtoxinA versus placebo. CONCLUSION: In patients treated with onabotulinumtoxinA for OAB with UI, an unapproved alternative injection paradigm targeting the lower bladder demonstrated efficacy over placebo, with a low incidence of CIC.

Six-Month Outcomes of Reimplantation of a Coin-Sized Tibial Nerve Stimulator for the Treatment of Overactive Bladder Syndrome With Urgency Urinary Incontinence.

OBJECTIVE: The eCoin (Valencia Technologies Corporation, Valencia, CA) is a battery-powered, nickel-sized and shaped neuromodulation device for the treatment of overactive bladder, and it is implanted in the lower leg in a short office or outpatient procedure under local anesthesia. A follow-on trial was conducted to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of eCoin reimplantation. METHODS: This was a prospective, single-arm, open-label study, including 23 participants with refractory urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) who were previously participants in the eCoin clinical feasibility trial. This follow-on study was conducted at 7 sites in the United States and New Zealand. Participants were reimplanted with a new eCoin device and activated after 4 weeks. Bladder diary data and validated quality-of-life instruments, collected at 12 weeks and 24 weeks postactivation, were compared with baseline. RESULTS: Participants of the study were considered responders if they reported a ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in episodes of UUI on a 3-day voiding diary. At 12 weeks of treatment, 74% (95% confidence interval [CI], 52%-90%) of participants were considered responders. At 24 weeks of treatment, 82% (95% CI, 60%-95%) of participants were considered responders with 36% (95% CI, 20%-57%) of participants achieving complete continence. There were no device-related serious adverse events reported during the study. CONCLUSIONS: The reimplantation of eCoin was both safe and effective in treating UUI associated with overactive bladder syndrome. The demonstrated significant reduction or resolution of symptoms with no serious safety concern suggests that eCoin is a convenient and maintainable therapeutic device.

Twelve-month Durability of a Fully-implanted, Nickel-sized and Shaped Tibial Nerve Stimulator for the Treatment of Overactive Bladder Syndrome with Urgency Urinary Incontinence: A Single-Arm, Prospective Study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the eCoin - a nickel-sized, primary battery-powered, neuromodulation device for the treatment of urgency urinary incontinence which is implanted in the lower leg in a 20-minute procedure under local anesthesia. A feasibility clinical trial was conducted and the results after 1 year of treatment with the eCoin are presented. METHODS: A total of 46 participants with refractory urgency urinary incontinence were included in this prospective, single-arm, open-label study. This study was conducted at 7 sites in the United States and New Zealand. Participants in this study were implanted with the eCoin in the lower leg over the tibial nerve and activated after 4 weeks. Bladder diary data and validated quality-of-life instruments, collected at 3, 6, and 12 months' post-activation, were compared to baseline values. RESULTS: Responders were defined as those who had a ≥50% reduction in reported episodes of urgency urinary incontinence. At 12 months', 65% of participants were considered responders with 26% of participants achieving complete continence. The median number of urgency urinary incontinence episodes per day decreased from 4.2 at baseline to 1.7 at 12 months'. Seventy percent of participants reported feeling "better", "much better", or "very much better" on the Likert 7-point maximum scale. One participant experienced a related serious adverse event. CONCLUSION: The eCoin is a safe and effective treatment for urgency urinary incontinence associated with overactive bladder syndrome, with significant reduction or complete resolution of symptoms and no significant safety concerns.

Taking OAB seriously: A qualitative evaluation of primary care education on overactive bladder syndrome management.

BACKGROUND: Overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome has a diverse etiology that disrupts quality of life domains in affected patients. OAB is significantly under-recognised and undertreated, especially in the primary care setting. In order to educate primary care providers about OAB recognition, evaluation and management, we created a virtual live-streamed and enduring education program. METHODS: We evaluated the impact of education on provider knowledge and self-efficacy via qualitative interviews with a sample of education participants. We analysed participant responses via constant comparative method, an iterative approach that allows for exploration of a priori issues and identification of emergent themes. RESULTS: We identified four key themes: (a) taking OAB seriously; (b) variations in therapy; (c) patient motivation; and (d) education value. Participants were proactive about screening for and managing OAB and recognised urgency as a key symptom; some participants used diagnostic tests that are not are not considered necessary in the workup of uncomplicated OAB patients. Participants varied in their descriptions of initial approaches to treatment and most participants described a longer-than-recommended follow-up window to monitor patients. Some participants characterised patients as looking for a "quick fix" in ways that could lead to provider inaction in relation to behavioural/lifestyle interventions. Overall, participants felt that the education validated their current practice and provided new knowledge about evaluation, initiating behavioural treatment, and combination therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Participant responses were congruent with education messages, which likely reflect their "readiness to learn". The rationale for diagnostic tests and evidence on the effectiveness of behavioural regimens represent ongoing areas of unmet educational need.

A Prospective Study to Evaluate Efficacy Using the Nuro Percutaneous Tibial Neuromodulation System in Drug-Naïve Patients With Overactive Bladder Syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate changes from baseline in urgency urinary incontinence episodes, urinary frequency and quality of life through 12 weeks of percutaneous tibial neuromodulation (PTNM) therapy using NURO in drug-naïve overactive bladder syndrome (OAB) subjects. METHODS: Eligible subjects underwent 12 weekly PTNM sessions with the NURO system. Changes in voiding symptoms were evaluated with bladder diaries from baseline through 12 weeks. Analyses were conducted for subjects with data at baseline and follow-up visits (sessions 1, 4, 8, and 12). Safety was evaluated through adverse events (AE) related to the device, procedure, and therapy. RESULTS: Of 154 subjects enrolled in the study,120 subjects met study criteria and received PTNM. The mean age was 64.8 years, mean duration of OAB diagnosis was 3.4 years and 86% female subjects. No subjects tried OAB medication prior to enrollment. At baseline, patients had 3.5 ± 2.5 (mean ± SD) UUI episodes/day. Statistically significant improvement in urgency urinary incontinence episodes from baseline was observed at each follow-up visit (P < .0001), with a reduction of 2.4 ± 2.1 episodes after session 12 from baseline. Subjects with urinary frequency at baseline had 11.5 ± 2.9 voids/day. After session 12, a statistically significant reduction of 1.7 ± 2.5 voids/day was observed (P < .0001). Ninety-six percent (116/120) of subjects completed the study with diary data for the primary objective with an average of 11.6 sessions. There were no serious or unanticipated AEs. The most common AEs were medical device site pain (3.3%, 4/121) and extremity pain (3.3%, 4/121). CONCLUSION: PTNM using NURO is an effective and safe treatment for drug-naïve patients with OAB.

Feasibility of a Fully Implanted, Nickel Sized and Shaped Tibial Nerve Stimulator for the Treatment of Overactive Bladder Syndrome with Urgency Urinary Incontinence.

PURPOSE: We performed a clinical feasibility trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a fully implanted, primary battery powered, nickel sized and shaped neuromodulation device called the eCoin® for tibial nerve stimulation to treat refractory urgency urinary incontinence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective, single arm, open label study included 46 participants with refractory urgency urinary incontinence. It was performed at multiple sites in the United States and New Zealand. The device was implanted in the lower leg over the tibial nerve and activated after 4 weeks. Bladder diary data and validated quality of life instruments were collected 3 and 6 months after activation and compared to baseline values. RESULTS: The mean ± SD age of participants was 63.4 ± 11.5 years and 45 (98%) were female. Episodes of urgency urinary incontinence were reduced a relative median of 71% after 3 months of treatment (4.2 vs 1.7 daily episodes at 3 months, p = 0.001). A 50% or greater decrease in reported episodes of urgency urinary incontinence was observed in 32 of 46 participants (69.6%) at 3 months with more than 20% dry at 3 and 6 months. I-QOL (Incontinence Quality of Life) scores improved an average of 25.9 points and 33 of 46 patients (72%) indicated improvement in symptoms. A single serious adverse event secondary to wound care resolved with intravenous antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: The implantable neuromodulation device was a safe and effective treatment of urgency urinary incontinence associated with overactive bladder syndrome with a significant reduction or resolution of symptoms and no significant safety concerns.

Efficacy and Safety of SER120 Nasal Spray in Patients with Nocturia: Pooled Analysis of 2 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled, Phase 3 Trials.

PURPOSE: SER120 desmopressin intranasal spray is the first U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved pharmacotherapy for nocturia. We evaluated its efficacy and safety in 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled studies, DB3 and DB4. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1,333 intent to treat patients 50 years old or older with 2.16 or more nocturic voids per night during a 2-week screening period were randomized equally to SER120 intranasal spray 1.66 or 0.83 mcg, or placebo for a 12-week treatment. Co-primary end points were the mean change from baseline in nocturic episodes per night and the percent of patients with a 50% or greater reduction in mean nocturic episodes per night. Secondary end points were the validated INTU (Impact of Nighttime Urination) quality of life questionnaire in DB4, time to the first nocturic void and the percent of nights with 1 or fewer nocturic voids. RESULTS: Each SER120 dose showed statistical significance vs placebo for the 2 co-primary end points, including the mean nocturic episodes per night (-1.4 with 0.83 mcg and -1.5 with 1.66 mcg vs -1.2 with placebo, each p <0.0001), the percent of patients with a 50% or greater reduction in mean nocturic episodes per night (37.9% with 0.83 mcg and 48.7% with 1.66 mcg vs 30.3% with placebo, p = 0.0227 and <0.0001, respectively) as well as for all secondary end points in the pooled analyses. The 1.66 mcg dose demonstrated significant improvements in the INTU score (p = 0.0255). The incidence of hyponatremia, defined as serum sodium 125 mmol/l or less regardless of symptoms or less than 130 mmol/l with symptoms, was 1.1%, 0% and 0.2% in the 1.66 and 0.83 mcg, and placebo groups, respectively. Other adverse events were similar across treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: SER120 demonstrated significant improvements over placebo for co-primary and secondary efficacy end points that corresponded with quality of life improvements. SER120 at each dose had an acceptable safety profile.

A pilot feasibility study of treating overactive bladder patients with percutaneous saphenous nerve stimulation.

AIMS: Effective long-term treatment of overactive bladder (OAB) remains a significant clinical challenge. We present our initial experience with a new bladder neuromodulation method that electrically targets the saphenous nerve (SAFN). METHODS: A total of 18 OAB patients (female, 55-84 years) were provided with percutaneous SAFN stimulation. The SAFN was targeted with a needle electrode inserted below the medial condyle of the tibia. Activation of the SAFN was confirmed by the patient's perception of paresthesia radiating down the leg. Electrical stimulation was applied for 30 min and subsequently repeated weekly for 3 months. The effects of stimulation were assessed by a 4-day bladder diary and quality-of-life questionaire (OAB-q). RESULTS: Percutaneous SAFN stimulation was confirmed in all 16 patients who completed the study, and no adverse events were reported. Positive response to SAFN stimulation was achieved in 87.5% (14 of 16) of patients, as determined by either a minimum 50% reduction in bladder symptoms or a minimum 10 point increase in the HRQL total score. CONCLUSIONS: Electrical activation of the SAFN was consistently achieved using anatomical landmarks and patient feedback. The procedure was well tolerated and, based on our small cohort of patients, appears efficacious, and safe. This pilot study provides early feasibility data that points to a promising new intervention for treating OAB.

Clean intermittent catheterization rates after initial and subsequent treatments with onabotulinumtoxinA for non-neurogenic overactive bladder in real-world clinical settings.

OBJECTIVE: Previous randomized controlled trials have reported a 6.1-6.9% incidence of clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) following treatment with onabotulinumtoxinA in non-neurogenic overactive bladder (OAB) patients who were inadequately managed by ≥1 anticholinergic. A multi-center retrospective chart review assessed the real-world rate of voiding dysfunction requiring catheterization. METHODS: Patients received onabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (approved dose) administered by experienced injectors between January 2013 and June 2015. Patients using CIC or an indwelling catheter for ≥24 hours for voiding dysfunction prior to onabotulinumtoxinA injections were excluded. The primary outcome was post-treatment CIC (lasting >24 hours; per individual physician's clinical judgment considering patient's voiding symptoms, post-void residual [PVR] urine volumes and patient bother). Potential baseline predictors of CIC (history of pelvic prolapse, cystocele, diabetes, PVR urine volume and age) were assessed using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Overall, 299 patients received their first treatment with onabotulinumtoxinA 100 U. Mean age was 66.4 years; 98.3% were female. The incidence of CIC was 2.7% in the total study population after the first treatment with onabotulinumtoxinA. The de novo CIC rate in treatments 2 and 3 combined was similarly low (3.2%). None of the evaluated baseline characteristics were significant predictors of CIC initiation due to the low CIC incidence. CONCLUSIONS: This real-world study of non-neurogenic OAB patients treated with onabotulinumtoxinA suggests that the CIC rate is lower than the rates reported in previous studies. There were no significant correlations between baseline predictors and CIC initiation, although statistical significance may not have been reached because of the low incidence of CIC.

Treating Overactive Bladder in Older Patients with a Combination of Mirabegron and Solifenacin: A Prespecified Analysis from the BESIDE Study.

BACKGROUND: The BESIDE study demonstrated that combination therapy (mirabegron and solifenacin 5mg) improved overactive bladder symptoms versus solifenacin 5mg or 10mg, and was well tolerated. OBJECTIVE: To ensure efficacy and safety is maintained in older patients (>65 yr), who usually experience greater symptom severity and comorbidities, a prespecified subanalysis stratified by age group was conducted. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients remaining incontinent (≥1 episode during 3-d diary) following 4-wk single-blind daily solifenacin 5mg were randomized 1:1:1 to a daily double-blind combination (solifenacin 5mg and mirabegron 25mg, increased to 50mg at wk 4), solifenacin 5mg or 10mg for 12 wk. Four cohorts stratified by age (<65 yr, ≥65 yr and < 75 yr, ≥75 yr) were investigated. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Efficacy assessments: change from baseline to end of treatment in average daily incontinence (primary) and micturition frequency (key secondary), number of incontinence episodes during the 3-d diary (key secondary), and change from baseline in average daily urgency and urgency incontinence episodes. Safety included treatment-emergent adverse events and vital signs. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Full analysis set included 2110 patients: 30.9% aged ≥65 yr and 8.9% aged ≥75 yr. At the end of treatment, daily, and 3-d incontinence daily micturitions, urgency, and urgency incontinence, were improved in each treatment group and age group; the largest reductions were observed with combination in each age cohort. There were no notable differences in vital signs or the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events between treatment and age groups, with the exception of dry mouth, which was highest with solifenacin 10mg. CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy and safety in the overall population is maintained in older (≥65 yr) and elderly (≥75 yr) patients treated with a combination of solifenacin and mirabegron, or solifenacin monotherapy; irrespective of age, combination was associated with the greatest improvement in overactive bladder symptoms. PATIENT SUMMARY: This study investigated the effectiveness and safety of a combination of two different treatments (mirabegron 50mg and solifenacin 5mg) or solifenacin (5mg or 10mg) alone in patients aged <65 yr or ≥65 yr, and <75 yr or ≥75 yr with overactive bladder. Symptoms of overactive bladder, such as the urgent need to visit the toilet, incontinence, and frequent urination, were improved with all treatments regardless of the patient's age, but combination treatment demonstrated the greatest benefit, and was well tolerated.

Assessing Preference-Based Outcome Measures for Overactive Bladder: An Evaluation of Patient-Reported Outcome Data from the BESIDE Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare outcomes using two preference-based measures of health status (EQ-5D-5L and OAB-5D) in patients with overactive bladder (OAB) treated with solifenacin plus mirabegron or solifenacin monotherapy in the BESIDE trial. METHODS: Patients with OAB who remained incontinent after 4 weeks' treatment with solifenacin 5 mg were randomized 1:1:1 to combination treatment (solifenacin 5 mg plus mirabegron [25 mg for the first 4 weeks/50 mg for the last 8 weeks]), solifenacin 5 mg, or solifenacin 10 mg. EQ-5D-5L and OAB-q were administered at baseline, weeks 4, 8, 12, and end of treatment (EoT). OAB-5D scores were derived from OAB-q results. Responder analysis was carried out using several definitions of minimally important difference. RESULTS: A total of 2054 patients received one or more doses of study treatment (combination, n = 694; solifenacin 5 mg, n = 684; solifenacin 10 mg, n = 676). EQ-5D-5L Index mean score changes (from baseline to EoT) were greater with combination (0.059) than with solifenacin 5 mg (0.040) and 10 mg (0.044) monotherapy, but the differences were not statistically significant. A significantly greater improvement was observed for combination on OAB-5D (0.107 vs 0.085 for 5 mg, and 0.087 for 10 mg; p ≤ 0.01). The dimensions most improved overall were anxiety/depression, pain/discomfort, and usual activities on EQ-5D-5L, and urge, urine loss, and coping on OAB-5D. The proportion of responders was significantly greater with combination compared with monotherapy using OAB-5D only. CONCLUSIONS: Improvements were observed in all study arms on both the EQ-5D-5L and OAB-5D, although only the OAB-5D showed a statistically significant benefit for combination versus solifenacin monotherapy. Combining generic and condition-specific preference-based health status measures allowed for assessment of dimensions that were particularly relevant to this patient population, while permitting comparison with outcomes from other studies, treatments, and populations via EQ-5D.

Cardiovascular safety in refractory incontinent patients with overactive bladder receiving add-on mirabegron therapy to solifenacin (BESIDE).

AIMS/OBJECTIVES: In the BESIDE study, combination therapy (antimuscarinic [solifenacin] and ß3 -adrenoceptor agonist [mirabegron]) improved efficacy over solifenacin monotherapy without exacerbating anticholinergic side effects in overactive bladder (OAB) patients; however, a potential synergistic effect on the cardiovascular (CV) system requires investigation. METHODS: OAB patients remaining incontinent despite daily solifenacin 5 mg during 4-week single-blind run-in, were randomised 1:1:1 to double-blind daily combination (solifenacin 5 mg/mirabegron 25 mg, increasing to 50 mg after week 4), solifenacin 5 or 10 mg for 12 weeks. CV safety assessments included frequency of CV-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), change from baseline in vital signs (systolic blood pressure [SBP], diastolic blood pressure [DBP], pulse rate) and electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters. RESULTS: The frequency of hypertension, tachycardia and ECG QT prolongation, respectively, was low and comparable across combination (1.1%, 0.3%, 0.1%), solifenacin 5 mg (0.7%, 0.1%, 0.1%), and solifenacin 10 mg groups (0.8%, 0%, 0.1%). Adjusted mean (SE) change from baseline to end of treatment (EoT) in SBP, DBP, and pulse rate with combination (0.07 mm Hg [0.38], -0.35 mm Hg [0.26], 0.47 bpm [0.28]), solifenacin 5 mg (-0.93 mm Hg [0.38], -0.45 mm Hg [0.26], 0.43 bpm [0.28]) and solifenacin 10 mg (-1.28 mm Hg [0.38], -0.48 mm Hg [0.26], 0.27 bpm [0.28]) was generally comparable, with the exception of a mean treatment difference of ~1 mm Hg in SBP between combination and solifenacin monotherapy; SBP was unchanged with combination and decreased with solifenacin monotherapy. Mean changes from baseline to EoT in ECG parameters were generally similar across treatment groups, except for QT interval corrected using Fridericia's formula, which was higher with solifenacin 10 mg (3.30 mseconds) vs. combination (0.49 mseconds) and solifenacin 5 mg (0.77 mseconds). CONCLUSION: The comparable frequency of CV-related TEAEs, changes in vital signs and ECG parameters indicates no synergistic effect on CV safety outcomes when mirabegron and solifenacin are combined.

Mirabegron as Add-On Treatment to Solifenacin in Patients with Incontinent Overactive Bladder and an Inadequate Response to Solifenacin Monotherapy: Responder Analyses and Patient-Reported Outcomes from the BESIDE Study [corrected].

PURPOSE: We investigated improvements in overactive bladder and patient reported outcomes in patients with overactive bladder and refractory incontinence treated with mirabegron 50 mg plus solifenacin 5 mg vs solifenacin 5 or 10 mg. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with overactive bladder who were incontinent despite 4 weeks of single-blind daily solifenacin 5 mg were randomized 1:1:1 to a double-blind daily combination of mirabegron 50 mg/solifenacin 5 mg, or solifenacin 5 or 10 mg for 12 weeks. The mirabegron dose was increased from 25 to 50 mg after week 4. Symptom bother, health related quality of life and patient perception of bladder condition were assessed by OAB-q (Overactive Bladder Questionnaire) and the PPBC (Patient Perception of Bladder Condition) questionnaire, respectively. Responder rates were based on a 50% reduction in daily incontinence, zero incontinence episodes and fewer than 8 micturitions per 24 hours with minimal important differences in OAB-q and PPBC. RESULTS: Overall 2,174 patients with a median age of 59 years were randomized, including 727 to the combination, 728 to solifenacin 5 mg and 719 to solifenacin 10 mg. Symptom bother, total health related quality of life and its subscales (coping, concern and social), and PPBC were significantly improved with combination vs solifenacin monotherapy (p <0.05). The odds of achieving clinically meaningful improvements in incontinence, micturition frequency, symptom bother, health related quality of life and PPBC were significantly higher for combination than solifenacin monotherapy. The odds of becoming continent was 47% and 28% higher for combination vs solifenacin 5 and 10 mg (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.17-1.84, p = 0.001 and OR 1.28; 95% CI 1.02-1.61, p = 0.033, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Significantly more patients on the combination achieved clinically meaningful improvements in incontinence and micturition frequency. Improvements were accompanied by similar improvements in PPBC, symptom bother and health related quality of life.

Efficacy and Safety of Mirabegron Add-on Therapy to Solifenacin in Incontinent Overactive Bladder Patients with an Inadequate Response to Initial 4-Week Solifenacin Monotherapy: A Randomised Double-blind Multicentre Phase 3B Study (BESIDE).

BACKGROUND: Incontinence has a greater detrimental effect on quality of life than other symptoms of overactive bladder (OAB) and is often difficult to treat with antimuscarinic monotherapy. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and the safety and tolerability of combination (solifenacin 5mg and mirabegron 50mg) versus solifenacin 5 or 10mg in OAB patients remaining incontinent after 4 wk of solifenacin 5mg. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: OAB patients remaining incontinent despite daily solifenacin 5mg during 4-wk single-blind run-in were randomised 1:1:1 to double-blind daily combination or solifenacin 5 or 10mg for 12 wk. Patients receiving the combination were initiated on mirabegron 25mg increasing to 50mg after week 4. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary end point was a change from baseline to end of treatment (EOT) in the mean number of incontinence episodes per 24h (stratified rank analysis of covariance [ANCOVA]). Key secondary end points were a change from baseline to EOT in the mean number of micturitions per 24h (ANCOVA) and number of incontinence episodes noted in a 3-d diary at EOT (mixed-effects Poisson regression). A trial (BESIDE) comparing combination treatment (solifenacin plus mirabegron) with one treatment alone (solifenacin) tested the superiority of combination versus solifenacin 5mg, noninferiority (and potential superiority) of combination versus solifenacin 10mg (key secondary end points), and the safety and tolerability of combination therapy versus solifenacin monotherapy. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 2174 patients were randomised to combination (n=727), solifenacin 5mg (n=728), or solifenacin 10mg (n=719). At EOT, combination was superior to solifenacin 5mg, with significant improvements in daily incontinence (p=0.001), daily micturitions (p<0.001), and incontinence noted in a 3-d diary (p=0.014). Combination was noninferior to solifenacin 10mg for key secondary end points and superior to solifenacin 10mg for improving daily micturitions. All treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Adding mirabegron 50mg to solifenacin 5mg further improved OAB symptoms versus solifenacin 5 or 10mg, and it was well tolerated in OAB patients remaining incontinent after initial solifenacin 5mg. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this 12-wk study, overactive bladder patients who remained incontinent despite initial solifenacin 5mg treatment received additional treatment with mirabegron 50mg. Combining mirabegron 50mg with solifenacin 5mg was superior to solifenacin 5mg alone in improving symptoms of incontinence and frequent urination, and it was well tolerated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01908829.

Validation of a bladder symptom screening tool in women with incontinence due to overactive bladder.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The Actionable Bladder Symptom Screening Tool (ABSST) was initially developed to identify patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) who could benefit from lower urinary tract assessment and treatment. Assessment of the measurement properties of the ABSST, including its ability to identify patients experiencing bladder symptoms related to overactive bladder (OAB), was undertaken in a general female population. METHODS: One hundred women completed the ABSST, OAB Questionnaire Short Form (OAB-q SF), and a patient global impression of severity (PGI-S) scale. Half of the sample had urgency urinary incontinence (UUI), while the other half did not. Descriptive statistics, reliability, and validity were examined, as was sensitivity and specificity of the previous cut-off score established in MS. RESULTS: Fifty-three women with UUI/OAB and 47 controls took part (71.0 % Caucasian). Patients with UUI/OAB were older (54.6 vs 40.4 years), had a higher body mass index (31.1 vs 26.4 kg/m(2)), and more comorbid conditions. The Cronbach's alpha reliability of ABSST was 0.90. High correlations with OAB-q SF Symptom Bother and Health Related Quality of Life (r = 0.83 and -0.81 respectively) supported concurrent validity. Using the PGI-S severity scores as a reference, the ABSST was able to distinguish patients with differing severity levels (known-group validity). Physician assessment of the need for further evaluation/treatment showed sensitivity (79 %) and specificity (98 %), supporting a cut-off score of ≥3. CONCLUSIONS: The previous MS ABSST scoring algorithm was validated in a non-neurogenic female population. ABSST is a reliable, valid, and sensitive tool for screening women with UUI/OAB.

Development of a short form and scoring algorithm from the validated actionable bladder symptom screening tool.

BACKGROUND: The majority of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients develop some form of lower urinary tract dysfunction, usually as a result of neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO). Patients identify urinary incontinence as one of the worst aspects of this disease. Despite the high prevalence of NDO, urological evaluation and treatment are significantly under-accessed in this population. The objectives of this study were: 1) to adapt the previously validated Actionable Bladder Symptom Screening Tool (ABSST) to a short form for ease and brevity of application in a clinical setting that is clinically meaningful; and 2) to develop a scoring algorithm that would be interpretable in terms of referring/considering precise diagnosis and treatment. METHODS: A US-based, non-randomized, multi-center, stand-alone observational study was conducted to assess the psychometric properties of the ABSST among patients who have MS with and without NDO. Mixed psychometric methods (e.g., classical statistics (Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994) and item response methods (Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences. New Jersey: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates; 2001)) were used to evaluate the predictive and clinical validity of the shortened form. The latter included clinicians flagging clinically meaningful items and associated response options which would indicate the need for further evaluation or treatment. RESULTS: A total of 151 patients, all with MS and with and without NDO, were recruited by 28 clinicians in various US geographical locations. Approximately 41% of patients reported a history of or currently having urinary incontinence and/or urinary urgency. The prediction model across the entire range of classification thresholds was evaluated, plotting the true positive identification rate against the false positive rate (1-Specificity) for various cut scores. In this study, the cut-point or total score of greater than or equal to 6 had a sensitivity of approximately 85%, and specificity of approximately 93% (i.e., 85% patients would warrant being referred to a urologist and 93% of the patients whose symptoms would not warrant urologist referral). CONCLUSIONS: Overall the short form ABSST demonstrated sensitivity and specificity as it maintained the integrity of the longer form tool. Concurrent validity for each subscale as well as predictive and concurrent validity of the total shortened instrument was demonstrated. This instrument provides a new method for assessing bladder problems among MS patients, and may facilitate earlier and more precise diagnosis, treatment, and/or referral to a specialist.

OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U significantly improves all idiopathic overactive bladder symptoms and quality of life in patients with overactive bladder and urinary incontinence: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome with urinary incontinence (UI) is prevalent in the population and impairs health-related quality of life (HRQOL). OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact on efficacy, safety, and HRQOL of onabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX(®), Allergan, Inc.) treatment in patients with OAB with UI. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This pivotal, multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study enrolled patients with idiopathic OAB with ≥ 3 urgency UI episodes over 3 d and ≥ 8 micturitions per day who were inadequately managed by anticholinergics. INTERVENTION: OnabotulinumtoxinA at a 100U dose (n=277) or placebo (n=271), administered as 20 intradetrusor injections of 0.5 ml. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Co-primary end points were change from baseline in the number of UI episodes per day and proportion of patients reporting positive treatment response on the treatment benefit scale (TBS) at week 12. Additional end points included other OAB symptoms (episodes of urinary urgency incontinence, micturition, urgency, and nocturia) and HRQOL (Incontinence Quality of Life [I-QOL], King's Health Questionnaire [KHQ]). Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs), postvoid residual (PVR) urine volume, and initiation of clean intermittent catheterisation (CIC). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: OnabotulinumtoxinA significantly decreased UI episodes per day at week 12 (-2.95 for onabotulinumtoxinA versus -1.03 for placebo; p<0.001). Reductions from baseline in all other OAB symptoms were also significantly greater following onabotulinumtoxinA compared with placebo (p ≤ 0.01). Patients perceived a significant improvement in their condition, as measured by patients with a positive treatment response on the TBS (62.8% for onabotulinumtoxinA versus 26.8% for placebo; p<0.001). Clinically meaningful improvements from baseline in all I-QOL and KHQ multi-item domains (p<0.001 versus placebo) indicated positive impact on HRQOL. AEs were mainly localised to the urinary tract. Mean PVR was higher in the onabotulinumtoxinA group (46.9 ml versus 10.1 ml at week 2; p<0.001); 6.9% of onabotulinumtoxinA patients versus 0.7% of placebo patients initiated CIC. CONCLUSIONS: OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U was well tolerated and demonstrated significant and clinically relevant improvements in all OAB symptoms, patient-reported benefit, and HRQOL in patients inadequately managed by anticholinergics. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00910520.