Therapeutic Modulation of Dupilumab in Patients with Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Clinical Effectiveness in Real Life.

Background: De-escalation strategies have become increasingly used in the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD) patients with dupilumab. Dose spacing (DS) refers to dose reduction by dosage elongation strategies from 2 to 8 weeks between dupilumab injections, in patients with stable response to treatment or affected by numerous adverse events. Objectives: Investigate safety and clinical effectiveness of DS strategy in AD patients treated with dupilumab. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on AD patients aged ≥18 years treated with dupilumab undergoing DS. Pre-post analyses were conducted on this cohort, termed cohort A, between effectiveness outcomes at baseline, at 16 weeks of treatment, at the index date identified as the mean follow-up time between dupilumab initiation and DS, and at subsequent two follow-up visits: T1 and T2. Based on the index date, a cohort B of AD patients on dupilumab treatment not experiencing DS was then compared with cohort A for the same outcomes at the same time points. Results: Seventy-three out of 452 patients treated with dupilumab underwent DS. The mean time since treatment initiation was 28.6 months. Mean Eczema Area Severity Index (EASI) from the index date remained stable until the second follow-up visit (T2) 0.2-0.8 with no significant pre-post differences (P > 0.05). Similar considerations can be made for mean number rating scale worst pruritus (NRSp), numerical rating scale disturbs of sleeping/sleeping disturb (NRSsd), mean Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and EASI Head and Neck. Attainment of relative outcomes remained stable for EASI75, 90, ≤ 7, DLQI ≤ 5, and NRSp ≤ 4. When compared with cohort B, no clinically significant differences were observed in mean reductions in all outcomes analyzed. Conclusions: DS in our study appears to be an effective and safe strategy in treating patients with severe AD after the initial therapeutic response.

Hand eczema: a review of clinical, dermoscopic and histological features.

INTRODUCTION: Hand eczema (HE) is a prevalent inflammatory skin condition, impacting 15-20% of individuals, with a notable incidence rate of approximately 7.3 cases per 1000 person/years. This condition exhibits significant gender-based variability, with a higher prevalence in females. The clinical presentation of HE is characterized by pruritic erythematous, edematous, weeping plaques, vesicles, and/or bullae, showcasing considerable heterogeneity. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including Medline, Pubmed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. The search was conducted using the following key words and medical subject heading (MeSH) terms: "hand," "eczema," "dermatitis," "dermoscopy," and "histology," employing the Boolean term "AND" to combine the research terms for optimal search precision. PRISMA algorithm has been used for article screening. The search scope included manuscripts published up to October 1, 2023. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Up to 50% of HE cases are associated with atopic dermatitis, emphasizing the complex interplay between various dermatological conditions. Common subtypes of HE include irritant contact dermatitis (ICD), allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), atopic hand eczema (AHE), and protein contact dermatitis/contact urticaria (PCD). The chronic nature of HE presents a substantial management challenge, often underestimated, leading to delayed treatment and potential progression to chronic hand eczema (CHE). Beyond individual health implications, HE exerts a profound impact on occupational, domestic, social, and psychological aspects, establishing itself as the most prevalent occupation-related skin disease. This paper seeks to establish a comprehensive classification system for HE, integrating clinical, dermoscopic, and histological elements. Dermoscopy, specifically, proves instrumental in distinguishing HE from palmar psoriasis, revealing characteristic features such as yellow scales and irregular vessels. Histopathological findings underscore the dynamic changes observed from acute to chronic stages, while challenges in differentiating hyperkeratotic HE from psoriasis underscore the necessity for a holistic diagnostic approach. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate diagnosis and effective management of HE necessitate a holistic perspective that recognizes the inherent complexities of this inflammatory skin disease. By providing a multidimensional classification system, incorporating clinical, dermoscopic, and histological parameters, this paper aimed to contribute to a more nuanced understanding of HE and facilitate improved approaches to its diagnosis and treatment.

Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma Diagnostic and Therapeutic Trends amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic.

is missing (Short communication).

Clinical characteristics and response to biological therapies for inverse psoriasis: a real-life comparison between the therapeutic effects of anti-IL-23 and anti-IL-17 agents.

BACKGROUND: Inverse psoriasis (IP) is a variant of plaque psoriasis involving flexor surfaces. A clear definition of IP is still lacking. Therapy is based on topical and systemic treatments, including classic systemic drugs and biologic agents, but a well-defined therapeutic strategy is absent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study investigated the general characteristics of patients with IP or vulgar psoriasis and compared the effectiveness of anti-interleukin-17 or anti-interleukin-23 agents in the same groups. Second, treatment effectiveness and the demographic characteristics of IP patients treated with IL-23 and IL-17 inhibitors were also compared. IP patients were included if they had specific psoriatic involvement of the axillary, inguinal, or submammary lines, breast folds, antecubital and popliteal pits, intergluteal fold, and perianal area. Patients with vulgar plaque psoriasis and concomitant intertriginous involvement were included in the vulgar psoriasis cohort. RESULTS: Patients with IP were prevalently female and treated with IL-17 inhibitors compared to those with vulgar psoriasis. They also had a greater risk of drug discontinuation and subsequent therapeutical switch (32.1% vs. 18.1%, P = 0.002). At later time points, those with IP showed progressively slower achievement of PASI100 and 90 compared to the cohort with vulgar psoriasis. In the IP cohort, there was greater joint involvement in patients treated with an anti-IL-17 agent (P = 0.011), who also had a lower median age of onset (P = 0.011) compared to patients treated with an anti-IL-23 agent. Patients with IP treated with an anti-IL-23 agent initiated with a lower mean PASI and showed a slower response than patients on an anti-IL-17 agent. At later time points, progressively greater effectiveness of IL-23 inhibitors was observed compared to IL-17 inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with IP responded less to biologic agents than those with vulgar psoriasis. In the IP cohort, IL-17 inhibitors had a faster onset than IL-23 inhibitors, but long-term anti-IL-23 agents seem to be associated with better outcomes.

Clinical effectiveness of IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors on difficult-to-treat psoriasis areas (scalp, genital, and palmoplantar sites): a retrospective, observational, single-center, real-life study.

INTRODUCTION: Psoriasis affecting the genital, palmoplantar, and scalp regions is recognized as difficult-to-treat, and data on the efficacy of biologics in these areas remains limited. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This single-center study evaluated the effectiveness of anti-IL-17 and anti-IL-23 agents on scalp, genital, and palmoplantar psoriasis. We retrospectively analyzed data from all patients with psoriasis being treated with IL inhibitors at our clinic. Effectiveness was evaluated at 16, 28, and 52 weeks, according to the achievement of relative and mean PSSI, PGA-G, and ppPASI. RESULTS: In all, 308 patients showed involvement of the scalp, 136 in the genital area, and 94 in the palmoplantar regions. On scalp psoriasis, anti-IL-17 agents demonstrated superiority in disease control compared to anti-IL-23 agents. PSSI100 at week 16 was reached by 59% of patients on an anti-IL17 vs 39.8% on an anti-IL-23 (p < 0.003). At genital sites, no significant differences between anti-IL-17 and anti-IL-23 agents were observed, and all classes achieved PGA-G 0/1. No significant differences between anti-IL-17 and anti-IL-23 agents were observed in palmoplantar areas. CONCLUSIONS: The present data support the utility of both anti-IL-17 and anti-IL-23 agents for the treatment of difficult-to-treat areas in patients with psoriasis. Anti-IL-17 agents achieved better control of scalp psoriasis.