Survival impact of lymph node dissection in endometrial adenocarcinoma: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results analysis.

The therapeutic benefit of lymph node dissection (LND) in women with endometrial cancer remains controversial. The purpose of this study is to analyze the impact of LND on survival. Data were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program of the US National Cancer Institute for the years 1988-2003. Women with adenocarcinoma of the endometrium who underwent surgery as primary management of their disease were eligible. Multivariate analyses of pertinent variables were performed for the end points of overall survival and cause-specific survival. Women included in the analysis were 42,184. The average frequency of LND was 31%, 40%, 47%, and 53%, for the years 1988-1991, 1992-1995, 1996-1999, and 2000-2003, respectively (P < 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, presence of LND was associated with overall and uterine-specific survival benefits with hazard ratios (HR) of 0.81 (P < 0.0001) and 0.78 (P < 0.0001) and removal of greater than 11 lymph nodes (LN) associated with a HR of 0.74 (P < 0.0001) and 0.69 (P < 0.0001), respectively. Further multivariate analyses demonstrated greater than 11 LN to associate with all other cause-specific and cardiac-specific survival benefits, with HR of 0.77 (P < 0.0001) and 0.82 (P = 0.0062), respectively. We conclude that the presence of LND and increased number of nodes dissected predicted for improved overall and uterine-specific survival in women with adenocarcinoma of the endometrium. Improved cause-specific survival was most pronounced for greater than 11 nodes removed and stage II or higher disease. The improvement in noncancer-related mortality with LND predicted by this data suggests the presence of inherit biases, and the need for caution in analyzing retrospective data.

Primary extradural meningiomas: a report on nine cases and review of the literature from the era of computerized tomography scanning.

OBJECT: Primary meningiomas arising outside the intracranial compartment (primary extradural meningiomas [PEMs]) are rare tumors. To develop a better understanding of these tumors and to establish a comprehensive classification scheme for them, the authors analyzed a series of patients treated at the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) and reviewed all cases reported in the English-language literature since the inception of the use of computerized tomography (CT) scanning. METHODS: Clinical records, results of radiographic studies, and histological slides were reviewed for all cases of PEM at MDACC. Demographic features, symptoms, tumor location, histological grade, and patient outcome were assessed in all cases. A comprehensive literature search identified 168 PEMs in 142 patients reported during the CT era. These reports were also analyzed for common features. Tumors for both data sets were classified as purely extracalvarial (Type I), purely calvarial (Type II), and calvarial with extracalvarial extension (Type III). Type II and Type III tumors were further categorized as convexity (C) or skull base (B) lesions. The incidence of PEMs at MDACC was 1.6%, which was consistent with the rate reported in the literature. In both data sets, the male/female ratio was nearly 1:1. The most common presenting symptom was a gradually expanding mass. The age of patients at diagnosis of PEM was bimodal, peaking during the second decade and during the fifth to seventh decades. In all MDACC cases and in 90% of those reported in the literature the PEMs were located in the head and neck. The majority of tumors originated in the skull (70%). In the MDACC series and in the literature review, the majority (67% and 89%, respectively) of tumors were histologically benign. Although fewer PEMs were malignant or atypical (33% at MDACC and 11% in the literature), their incidence was higher than that observed for primary intracranial meningiomas. Distant metastasis was not a common feature reported for patients with PEMs (6% in the literature). Outcome data were available in 96 of the cases culled from the CT-era literature. The combination of the MDACC data and the data obtained from the literature demonstrated that patients with benign Type IIB or Type IIIB lesions were more likely to experience recurrence than patients with benign Type IIC or Type IIIC tumors (26% compared with 0%, p < 0.05). The more aggressive atypical and malignant tumors were associated with a statistically significant higher death rate (29%) relative to benign tumors (4.8% death rate, p < 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Defining a tumor as a PEM is dependent on the tumor's relation to the dura mater and the extent and direction of its growth. Classification of PEMs as calvarial or extracalvarial and as convexity or skull base lesions correlates well with clinical outcome.