Using inquiry based stress reduction to address self-stigma in severe spectrum obesity in general practice.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a driver of multimorbidity. Knowledge regarding individual and population based solutions is evolving in primary care. Stigma/self-stigma are important in developing clinical solutions. Inquiry based stress reduction (IBSR) is emerging as a solution for self-stigma in a range of conditions. This study explores IBSR (also known as The Work of Byron Katie) in obesity self-stigma in the GP setting, with severe obesity, utilising a multidisciplinary approach. AIM: Is it feasible/acceptable to utilise Inquiry Based Stress Reduction in the GP setting for obesity? METHOD: Mixed-method pilot study including a convenience sample of people with severe spectrum obesity from a three-doctor general practice, including use of IBSR provided in both group, partner and individual settings, predominantly online, utilising certified and accredited IBSR facilitators, a clinical psychologist, and participating GPs. Outcomes include pre- and post-intervention surveys (Becks Depression Scale, HRQoL, Weight Bias Internalisation Scale, Weight Self-stigma Questionnaire) and qualitative data from participants. RESULTS: Of 22 initially invited to participate, 14 commenced and 10 completed the intervention. Mean BMI was 42.8, mean age 49 years, female:male = 7:3. Many believed obesity was their own fault, related very difficult interactions with healthcare professionals, and valued opportunity to engage with the intervention. While participants had alarming levels of comorbidity, they were far more concerned regarding stigma and self-stigma. CONCLUSION: Results and experience in practice indicate this approach is feasible and acceptable. Results are valuable in planning a larger study in multiple practices.

Current Therapies and Drug Development Pipeline in Lewy Body Dementia: An Update.

The term Lewy body dementia refers to either of two related diagnoses: dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and Parkinson's disease dementia (PDD). Clinical management of Lewy body dementia is challenging. The current treatment options focus on relieving symptoms; no disease-modifying therapies are available. There are currently no US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved drugs for the treatment of DLB, and there are only a few for PDD. Cholinesterase inhibitors are shown to be beneficial in improving cognitive symptoms in Lewy body dementia. Rivastigmine was approved by the FDA to treat PDD. Donepezil was approved in Japan as a treatment for DLB. Levodopa may provide modest benefit in treating motor symptoms and zonisamide in adjunct to low-dose levodopa helps with parkinsonism. Treatment of autonomic symptoms are based on symptomatic treatment with off-label agents. Our main objective in this article is to present an overview of the current pharmacological options available to treat the clinical features of DLB and PDD. When evaluating the existing management options for Lewy body dementia, it is difficult to fully separate PDD from DLB. However, we have attempted to identify whether the cited studies include patients with PDD and/or DLB. Moreover, we have provided an overview of the current drug pipeline in Lewy body dementia. All currently active trials are in phase I or II and most are focused on disease modification rather than symptomatic treatment. Phase II trial results for neflamapimod show promising results. Due to heterogeneity of symptoms and underlying pathophysiology, there is a need for new biomarker strategies and improved definitions of outcome measures for Lewy body dementia drug trials.

The impact of huddles on a multidisciplinary healthcare teams' work engagement, teamwork and job satisfaction: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Job satisfaction and retention of healthcare staff remains an ongoing issue in many health systems. Huddles have been endorsed as a mechanism to improve patient safety by improving teamwork, collaboration, and communication in teams. AIM: This study aims to synthesises the literature to investigate the impact of huddles on job satisfaction, teamwork, and work engagement in multidisciplinary healthcare teams. METHODS: Five academic databases were searched to conduct a systematic review of peer-reviewed literature published from January 2000 to January 2020. Articles were included if they (1) featured a daily huddle, were conducted in a healthcare setting, and involved a multidisciplinary team and (2) measured variables including job satisfaction, work engagement, or teamwork. Results were reported in accordance with the systematic synthesis without meta-analysis and preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis guidelines. We identified 445 articles of which 12 met the eligibility criteria and are included in this review. RESULTS: All 12 included studies found a predominantly positive impact on teamwork and job satisfaction. None of the studies discussed or reported evidence of the impact of huddles on work engagement. This review highlights the value of a daily multidisciplinary healthcare team huddle in improving job satisfaction and teamwork for the healthcare staff involved. However, there is a dearth of high-quality, peer-reviewed evidence regarding the direct impact of huddles on job satisfaction, teamwork and in particular on work engagement. Further research-particularly controlled studies on adoption, implementation and outcomes for healthcare team culture-is needed to further assess this intervention.

The Collective Leadership for Safety Culture (Co-Lead) Team Intervention to Promote Teamwork and Patient Safety.

Traditional hierarchical leadership has been implicated in patient safety failings internationally. Given that healthcare is almost wholly delivered by multidisciplinary teams, there have been calls for a more collective and team-based approach to the sharing of leadership and responsibility for patient safety. Although encouraging a collective approach to accountability can improve the provision of high quality and safe care, there is a lack of knowledge of how to train teams to adopt collective leadership. The Collective Leadership for Safety Cultures (Co-Lead) programme is a co-designed intervention for multidisciplinary healthcare teams. It is an open-source resource that offers teams a systematic approach to the development of collective leadership behaviours to promote effective teamworking and enhance patient safety cultures. This paper provides an overview of the co-design, pilot testing, and refining of this novel intervention prior to its implementation and discusses key early findings from the evaluation. The Co-Lead intervention is grounded in the real-world experiences and identified needs and priorities of frontline healthcare staff and management and was co-designed based on the evidence for collective leadership and teamwork in healthcare. It has proven feasible to implement and effective in supporting teams to lead collectively to enhance safety culture. This intervention overview will be of value to healthcare teams and practitioners seeking to promote safety culture and effective teamworking by supporting teams to lead collectively.

An electronic clinic for arthroplasty follow-up: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Most outpatient orthopedic follow-up visits for patients who had total joint arthroplasty are routine among those with well-functioning implants. The technology and resources now exist to enable patient assessment without requiring attendance in hospital. We tested an electronic clinic for routine follow-up in a small cohort of arthroplasty patients. METHODS: We randomly assigned primary arthroplasty patients scheduled for routine annual outpatient review into 2 groups: group A completed a Web-based assessment 4 weeks after the clinical assessment, whereas group B completed the Web-based assessment first. Standard clinical questionnaires were included. We also collected radiographic data and information on assessment duration and cost. RESULTS: Forty patients participated in the study. The average age of participants was 58 years. There were 12 men and 8 women in each of the 2 groups. The average total time spent by patients on an outpatient visit was 115 minutes, compared with 52 minutes for the electronic assessment. Participants reported the electronic assessment to be more convenient and less costly. CONCLUSION: This pilot study supports the practical use of an electronic clinic for the follow-up of arthroplasty patients. Further studies examining the complex interaction of factors involved in patient clinics are needed.

Use of seat belts in rural Alberta: an observational analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This paper details an observational study that estimates rates for wearing seat belts in rural Alberta and compares them with rates derived from a similar study conducted in 1999. METHOD: Direct observations of drivers and front-seat passengers of 72,593 light-duty vehicles were carried out at 334 survey locations in communities with populations of fewer than 25,000, throughout northern, central and southern Alberta. In addition to seat belt use, information collected included vehicle type, gender of drivers and passengers and, at intersections controlled by a stop sign, whether or not the vehicle came to a complete stop. RESULTS: The results indicate that in 2001 in rural Alberta the estimated proportion of driver and front-seat passengers of light-duty vehicles using seat belts was 76.1%. When compared with 1999 data, this represents a 6.9% increase in seat belt wearing rates. The data was desegregated further to show differential wearing rates between drivers of different vehicle types, males and females, drivers and passengers, and between those who came to a complete stop at a stop sign and those who did not. The time of day in which data collection took place also had some influence on seat belt wearing rates. DISCUSSION: This study contributes valuable information to programs and initiatives that aim to increase the use of seat belts in rural Alberta.