Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Contact Dermat ; 12(2): 88-92, 2001 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11381344

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Health care workers are exposed to many agents that can cause irritant or allergic contact dermatitis. Recently, much attention has been focused on latex sensitivity, which commonly causes contact urticaria. Most studies have examined the conditions of irritant or allergic contact dermatitis and contact urticaria independently. Therefore, we have little information about the possible occurrence of these conditions in the context of combined assessment including both prick and patch testing. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of irritant and allergic contact dermatitis and contact urticaria in a group of health care workers presenting with skin problems. METHODS: Retrospective review of health care workers assessed by both prick and patch testing in an occupational health clinic. RESULTS: The diagnoses included 61% with irritant contact dermatitis, 31% with allergic contact dermatitis, and 27% with contact urticaria to latex. Eleven percent had both allergic contact dermatitis related to thiuram and contact urticaria to latex. Ninety five percent were deemed to be work-related. CONCLUSION: Health care workers presenting with skin complaints should be assessed with both prick and patch testing.


Assuntos
Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/epidemiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/epidemiologia , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Alérgenos/efeitos adversos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Testes Intradérmicos , Hipersensibilidade ao Látex/epidemiologia , Masculino , Prontuários Médicos , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Ontário/epidemiologia , Testes do Emplastro , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
J Comp Physiol A ; 186(1): 39-43, 2000 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10659041

RESUMO

Pituitary adenylate cyclase activating peptide (PACAP-38) is a peptide hormone which functions in many mammalian systems, including the nervous and digestive systems. Using in vivo behavioral studies, we have found that this hormone functions as a chemore-pellent in Tetrahymena thermophila with an EC50 of 10 nM. Cells previously adapted to PACAP-38 were found to be adapted to lysozyme and vice versa. Furthermore, the in vivo behavioral activity of PACAP-38 was blocked by addition of the anti-lysozyme receptor antibody, 5545. Chemorepellent activity of PACAP-38 was also inhibited by the addition of neomycin sulfate (inhibition constant Ki = 0.080 micromol x l(-1)), a competitive inhibitor of lysozyme binding to its receptor. PACAP-38 is a more potent and specific agonist for the lysozyme receptor than either intact lysozyme or CB2, a 24-amino acid fragment of lysozyme.


Assuntos
Neuropeptídeos/farmacologia , Neurotransmissores/farmacologia , Receptores do Hormônio Hipofisário/metabolismo , Tetrahymena thermophila/efeitos dos fármacos , Adaptação Fisiológica/efeitos dos fármacos , Animais , Anticorpos/farmacologia , Comportamento Animal/efeitos dos fármacos , Reações Cruzadas , Muramidase/farmacologia , Neomicina/farmacologia , Polipeptídeo Hipofisário Ativador de Adenilato Ciclase , Inibidores da Síntese de Proteínas/farmacologia , Proteínas de Protozoários/imunologia , Proteínas de Protozoários/metabolismo , Receptores de Polipeptídeo Hipofisário Ativador de Adenilato Ciclase , Receptores do Hormônio Hipofisário/agonistas , Receptores do Hormônio Hipofisário/imunologia , Sistemas do Segundo Mensageiro/efeitos dos fármacos , Transdução de Sinais/fisiologia , Tetrahymena thermophila/química
3.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol ; 80(3): 252-6, 1998 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9532974

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of allergy to natural rubber latex and potential crossreacting foods in operating room nurses. METHOD: Two hundred forty-seven operating room nurses completed a latex allergy questionnaire. They were questioned about symptoms of latex reactivity and about other allergies particularly to foods that may crossreact with latex. Informed consent was obtained and skin prick testing was performed with natural rubber latex and five latex extracts representing low (0.08 to 0.25 microgram/mL) and high (18 to 106 micrograms/mL) natural rubber latex protein gloves. Skin prick tests were done with four potentially crossreacting foods (banana, avocado, kiwi, and potato), saline, and histamine controls. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-five (54.7%) nurses described allergic symptoms they attributed to latex exposure. Of these 12 (4.9%) tested positive to latex extracts alone, 12 (4.9%) tested positive to food extracts alone, and 5 (2.0%) tested positive to both latex and crossreactive foods. Three of the 17 (17.6%) nurses testing positive to latex gave no history of reactivity to latex. Indirect latex ELISA was done on the serum of skin test-positive patients with a 70.6% sensitivity. CONCLUSION: Of the nurses tested, 6.9% had positive skin prick tests to latex extracts; 17.6% of these were asymptomatic and 29.4% had associated food positive skin prick tests.


Assuntos
Luvas Cirúrgicas , Hipersensibilidade/etiologia , Látex/imunologia , Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros , Adulto , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Salas Cirúrgicas , Testes Cutâneos
4.
J Clin Gastroenterol ; 24(2): 71-3, 1997 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9077719

RESUMO

We undertook a retrospective review of 25 patients who had undergone percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). Data regarding the clinical courses were collected, and a questionnaire was administered to patients when possible; in most cases the individual responsible for care answered questions. We pinpointed concerns relevant to the decision-making process. In a substantial proportion of cases, the clinical courses subsequent to PEG were poor. Of 21 surrogates interviewed, 33% were uncertain that proceeding to nutritional support via PEG had been the right decision. Findings indicate a need to improve the process by which decisions to treat by PEG are made, ideally including better prognostic information.


Assuntos
Gastrostomia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Tomada de Decisões , Endoscopia , Feminino , Gastrostomia/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Projetos Piloto , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...