Cross-linked hyaluronan gel improves the quality of life of prostate cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that cross-linked hyaluronan gel (Hylaform) does not affect the quality of life (QOL) of prostate cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-five patients with early stage prostate cancer underwent high-dose-rate brachytherapy to 2200 cGy and intensity modulated radiation therapy to 5040 cGy on a prospective study. Thirty patients received a single transperineal injection of 9-mL Hylaform between the prostate and rectum under transrectal ultrasound guidance immediately before the start of radiotherapy. Hylaform increased the separation between the prostate and rectum by 6-19 mm (median, 13 mm) at the start of radiotherapy. Five patients did not receive Hylaform and served as controls. We assessed gastrointestinal-related QOL using Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Bowel Bother scores immediately before the start of and during the last week of radiotherapy. RESULTS: At the beginning of intensity modulated radiation therapy, daily mean rectal doses were 74±8 cGy (mean±standard deviation) and 105±25 cGy (mean±standard deviation) with vs. without Hylaform, respectively (p=0.01). Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite Bowel Bother scores decreased by 0±3 (mean±standard deviation) and 11±14 (mean±standard deviation) in patients who did and did not receive Hylaform, respectively (p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Hylaform increased the separation between the prostate and rectum and decreased the mean rectal dose, thereby improving the gastrointestinal-related acute QOL of prostate cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. Patients will be followed up long term to determine if the improvement in acute QOL also translates into an improvement in late QOL.

Preliminary Results in 173 Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Post-Lumpectomy MammoSite Single-Lumen Brachytherapy or Multi-Catheter Brachytherapy.

The objective of this study was to report our single-institution results with MammoSite and multi-catheter brachytherapy. Between February 2003 and January 2009, 173 women with unifocal pathological Tis, T1, or T2 (up to 30 mm), N0 or N1 carcinomas of the breast were treated with post-lumpectomy brachytherapy to 34 Gy in 10 fractions over 5-10 days. We treated 137 patients with MammoSite single-lumen balloon brachytherapy, and 36 patients with multi-catheter brachytherapy. Patients with small and/or nonspherical lumpectomy cavities were usually treated with multi-catheter brachytherapy using 4-12 interstitial catheters. Median follow-up was 33 months. Three-year ipsilateral breast tumor control, disease-free, and overall survival rates for MammoSite brachytherapy were 100%, 100%, and 99%, respectively. Similar rates were obtained with multi-catheter brachytherapy. Minimum distances from the planning target volume for plan evaluation to a rib were 10 ± 8 mm (mean ± standard deviation) and 8 ± 4 mm (mean ± standard deviation) for MammoSite brachytherapy and multi-catheter brachytherapy, respectively (p = 0.48). Maximum rib doses were 101 ± 14% (mean ± standard deviation) and 74 ± 10% (mean ± standard deviation) of the prescribed dose for MammoSite brachytherapy and multi-catheter brachytherapy, respectively (p = 0.001). Multi-catheter brachytherapy results in more conformal radiation dose delivery and a significantly lower rib dose than MammoSite single-lumen brachytherapy. Long-term follow-up is needed to determine if the delivery of a lower radiation dose to the ribs will translate into a lower incidence of rib pain and fractures.

Results with accelerated partial breast irradiation in terms of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human growth factor receptor 2 status.

PURPOSE: To report our results with accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) in terms of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2/neu) status. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between February 2003 and June 2009, 209 women with early-stage breast carcinomas were treated with APBI using multicatheter, MammoSite, or Contura brachytherapy to 34 Gy in 10 fractions twice daily over 5-7 days. Three patient groups were defined by receptor status: Group 1: ER or PR (+) and HER-2/neu (-) (n = 180), Group 2: ER and PR (-) and HER-2/neu (+) (n = 10), and Group 3: ER, PR, and HER-2/neu (-) (triple negative breast cancer, n = 19). Median follow-up was 22 months. RESULTS: Group 3 patients had significantly higher Scarff-Bloom-Richardson scores (p < 0.001). The 3-year ipsilateral breast tumor control rates for Groups 1, 2, and 3 were 99%, 100%, and 100%, respectively (p = 0.15). Group 3 patients tended to experience relapse in distant sites earlier than did non-Group 3 patients. The 3-year relapse-free survival rates for Groups 1, 2, and 3 were 100%, 100%, and 81%, respectively (p = 0.046). The 3-year cause-specific and overall survival rates for Groups 1, 2, and 3 were 100%, 100%, and 89%, respectively (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Triple negative breast cancer patients typically have high-grade tumors with significantly worse relapse-free, cause-specific, and overall survival. Longer follow-up will help to determine whether these patients also have a higher risk of ipsilateral breast tumor relapse.

Preliminary results in prostate cancer patients treated with high-dose-rate brachytherapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) vs. IMRT alone.

PURPOSE: To analyze results with high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) vs. IMRT alone for prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between October 2003 and August 2008, 284 patients with early stage prostate cancer underwent HDR brachytherapy to 2200cGy and IMRT to 5040cGy (n=240) or IMRT alone to 7920-8100cGy (n=44). RESULTS: The median followup was 2.2 years. There was no significant difference in terms of the proportions of patients who had diabetes mellitus (p=0.07) or who received hormonal therapy (p=0.75) by radiotherapy technique. The 3-year biochemical disease-free survival rates in low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk patients treated with HDR brachytherapy and IMRT are 100%, 98%, and 93%, respectively. The 3-year biochemical disease-free survival rates in low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk patients treated with IMRT alone are 100%, 100%, and 67%, respectively. There was no significant difference in biochemical disease-free survival or toxicity between treatment groups. The similarity in outcomes between treatment groups remained unchanged when we examined only hormone-naive patients. CONCLUSIONS: The HDR brachytherapy and IMRT yielded similar biochemical disease-free survival and toxicity to IMRT alone. As a result, we continue to base treatment on physician and patient preference. Longer followup will help to determine the role of HDR brachytherapy and IMRT in the treatment of early stage prostate cancer, particularly because a number of patients received androgen deprivation therapy and we delivered a higher biologically effective dose with combined modality therapy.

Preliminary results with accelerated partial breast irradiation in high-risk breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: To analyze prognostic factors in adequately staged breast cancer patients who were treated with accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Axillary staging was required for invasive carcinomas. Between February 2003 and June 2009, 204 women with early stage breast carcinomas were treated with APBI using multicatheter, MammoSite, or Contura brachytherapy to 34 Gy in 10 fractions 2 times per day. Six patient characteristics were examined for prognostic significance: (1) N stage, (2) estrogen receptor (ER) status, (3) histologic subtype, (4) margin status, (5) age, and (6) tumor size. The median followup was 22 months. RESULTS: There were three failures in the ipsilateral breast (all were elsewhere failures), one relapse in the axilla, and seven relapses at any site. The presence of positive axillary node(s) had a significant adverse effect on ipsilateral breast tumor control (p=0.045) and locoregional control (p=0.001). The presence of an ER (-) tumor had a significant adverse effect on relapse-free survival (p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The patients with positive axillary node(s) were at increased risk for failure elsewhere in the ipsilateral breast or axilla, and the patients with ER (-) tumors were at increased risk for relapse at any site. However, it is unclear whether the pN1 and ER (-) patients would have faired any better if they had received whole breast irradiation rather than APBI. We believe that the patients with positive axillary node(s) or ER (-) tumors should be treated on clinical trials to better define the role of APBI.