RESUMO
Damage to the central nervous system leads to the loss of motor control, loss of consciousness, sensory, cognitive and perceptive dysfunction. Patients are immobile in the early phase of recovery, therefore therapeutic approach demands appropriate methods of patient positioning in bed. The positioning has to ensure conditions that will stimulate and promote functional rehabilitation and prevent complications of immobility. The positioning has to rely on functional assessment of the patient problem, while it should also be therapeutic and individually adjusted to the patient needs. In the methods of positioning an immobile patient, all medical team members take part, especially nurses, physical therapists and occupational therapists. Results of positioning are better if mobilization and integration of the abilities regained by the patient are included.
Assuntos
Doenças do Sistema Nervoso/terapia , Posicionamento do Paciente/métodos , Úlcera por Pressão , Humanos , Imobilização/efeitos adversos , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso/complicações , Úlcera por Pressão/etiologia , Úlcera por Pressão/prevenção & controleAssuntos
Neurologia , Prática Profissional , Transtornos Psicofisiológicos , Adaptação Psicológica , Comportamento/fisiologia , Humanos , Sistema Límbico/fisiologia , Sistema Límbico/fisiopatologia , Transtornos Psicofisiológicos/etiologia , Transtornos Psicofisiológicos/fisiopatologia , Transtornos Psicofisiológicos/psicologia , SíndromeRESUMO
Terguride is an ergoline derivative with mixed agonistic/antagonistic dopaminergic activity. This led to a paradoxical suggestion that it is effective in the treatment of both schizophrenia and parkinsonism. A total of 65 in- or outpatients with parkinsonism mostly of vascular or idiopathic etiology were included in a 4-week, open, multicenter trial. Terguride was administered under an increasing dose schedule which was leveled off according to the clinical response. Mostly because of nausea, vomiting, and lack of improvement 25% of inpatients and 61% of outpatients were removed from the study. The average daily dose at the end of the trial was 4.2 mg, ranging from 1.0 to 5.5 mg. The average Simpson and Angus scale total score and performance in the Spiral Drawing Task improved significantly during the trial by 20% and 38% respectively. The following adverse effects were noted most frequently throughout the study (including those who withdrew): constipation (occurred in 42% of all ratings performed during the trial) drowsiness and nausea (16% each). Adverse circulatory effects were negligible. Psychotic symptoms, including depression, confusion, hallucinations, and paranoid syndrome, each occurred in 1 patient, i.e., at a lower rate than with other dopaminergic drugs. Scotopic electroretinograms in a subsample of 7 patients showed a significant transitory decrease in the B-wave amplitude at the end of the 1st week and a subsequent return to pretreatment values.