Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Reconstr Microsurg ; 28(5): 333-40, 2012 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22588794

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Muscle (M) and fasciocutaneous (FC) free flaps are frequently used options in the reconstruction of traumatic lower limb injuries. The use of one flap over another has remained the topic of controversy in the literature. With a large experience, we sought to evaluate key outcomes of M versus FC free flap reconstructions in lower limb trauma in a single trauma center. METHODS: A consecutive 7- year review of all free flap reconstructions for lower limb trauma performed at the Royal Melbourne Hospital was conducted. Patient data were prospectively entered into a unit database and retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: One hundred three patients underwent 105 free flap reconstructions (M = 48 and FC = 57) in lower limb trauma. We experienced a rate of 2.9% total flap failures and 11.4% partial flap losses. Total flap failures represented 6.3% M and 0% FC flaps. The partial flap failures included 15.8% of M and 5.3% of FC flaps. Latissimus dorsi (40% of M group) and radial forearm free flaps (67% of FC group) were most commonly used in each group. There was a statistically significant difference between groups in rates of reoperation (M = 44% versus FC = 16%), postoperative infection (M = 38% versus FC = 12%), fracture nonunion (M = 40% versus FC = 21%), and donor site morbidity (M = 25% versus FC = 4%). Nonstatistically significant differences were encountered with higher rates of osteomyelitis (M = 14.6% versus FC = 10.5%), unplanned bone graft (M = 14.6 versus FC = 10.5%), and inability to bear full weight at 1 year (M = 30.2% versus FC = 17.0%) found in the M group. In our cohort, M flaps used for metal coverage resulted in higher rates of reoperation, postoperative infections, and flap loss than FC flaps (M = 61% versus FC = 25%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Statistically higher complication rates in key reliability markers were found in the M free flap group. This study found FC free flaps to be more reliable for reconstruction of lower limb injuries in a major trauma center.


Assuntos
Retalhos de Tecido Biológico , Extremidade Inferior/lesões , Extremidade Inferior/cirurgia , Adulto , Transplante Ósseo/estatística & dados numéricos , Desbridamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Fáscia/transplante , Fixação Interna de Fraturas , Fraturas não Consolidadas/epidemiologia , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Músculo Esquelético/transplante , Osteomielite/epidemiologia , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Transplante de Pele , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Centros de Traumatologia , Suporte de Carga
2.
ANZ J Surg ; 78(5): 383-8, 2008 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18380738

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Free tissue transfer has become a safe and reliable means for repairing soft tissue and bony defects of the head and neck. Although operative success has reached 98%, the incidence of significant postoperative complications is also relatively high (32%). One common and significant complication is haematoma formation, occurring at both donor and recipient sites, and yet there are minimal published studies on its incidence, aetiology or outcome. A retrospective analysis of both donor- and recipient-site wound haematoma was carried out to identify causative factors and the effect on patient outcome. METHODS: A 5-year review of 132 consecutive microvascular free tissue transfers to head and neck defects at The Royal Melbourne Hospital, for the period February 2001 to February 2006, was conducted. RESULTS: Of 126 included cases, 27 postoperative haematomas resulted. Statistically significant associations were found for each of smoking, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and the use of corticosteroids preoperatively with the incidence of postoperative haematoma formation. Postoperative blood pressure control and the adequacy of primary tumour excision at the flap recipient site were also found to have significant associations with haematoma formation. Drain tube outputs served as accurate indicators for haematoma. CONCLUSION: There are significant reversible factors that contribute to the development of postoperative haematomas in head and neck reconstructive surgery. Preoperative modifications should, therefore, be sought. Similarly, close monitoring of patient blood pressure during the initial 24 h postoperative period by theatre and recovery staff is important, as is the adequacy of postoperative analgesia.


Assuntos
Hematoma/prevenção & controle , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/efeitos adversos , Retalhos Cirúrgicos/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Cabeça/cirurgia , Hematoma/etiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Microcirurgia/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pescoço/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA