The effect of neoadjuvant Imatinib therapy on outcome and survival after rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumour.

AIM: The study aimed to characterize the pathological and clinical response of rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) to neoadjuvant Imatinib. METHOD: The medical records of patients with rectal GISTs who were diagnosed and treated in five medical centres in Israel between January 2002 and January 2009 were retrospectively examined. Twelve patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria of nonmetastatic rectal GIST for which preoperative neoadjuvant treatment with Imatinib was considered were suitable for enrollment. RESULTS: Of the 12 patients, nine received neoadjuvant treatment with Imatinib. The three patients who had immediate surgery were excluded. There were five men and four women with a median age of 63 years and a median follow up of 32 months. All tumours were located in the lower two-thirds of the rectum. One patient had a complete clinical response, six had a partial response and two had stable disease. Seven patients subsequently underwent surgery; six had an R0 resection and one had an R1 resection. Three patients had recurrence. There was no disease-related mortality. The reduction in both tumour size and mitotic activity during preoperative Imatinib therapy was significant. CONCLUSION: Preoperative Imatinib therapy can shrink large rectal GISTs, improving the chances of successful radical surgery and decreasing the risk of considerable morbidity.

The use of circular stapler for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: surgical technique and early postoperative outcome.

Stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy is considered to be superior to traditional handsewn techniques. Linear staplers are usually used. The aim of this study is to evaluate early postoperative results of circular stapler in cervical esophagogastric anastomosis. Records of all patients who underwent esophagectomy during the years 2003-2008 were reviewed. Patients that underwent transthoracic esophagectomy, colon transposition, or linear stapler anastomosis were excluded. Esophagogastric anastomosis was done either handsewn or using circular stapler. Patients underwent either pyloromyotomy, pyloroplasty, or no pyloric intervention. Postoperative leakage was diagnosed either clinically or radiologically. The end-point of this study was the incidence of anastomotic leak in the immediate postoperative period. Eighty-two patients (average age 66 years, male/female, 52/30) met the inclusion criteria. In 30 patients, the anastomosis was handsewn, and in 52 patients, it was done using a circular stapler. Overall operative mortality rate was 4.8% (four patients because of pulmonary or cardiac complications). Anastomotic leak occurred in five (n = 5, 16.6%) patients in the handsewn group and eight (n = 7, 13.4%) patients in the circular stapler group. Pyloric manipulation had no significant effect over the leakage rate. Routine upper-gastrointestinal (GI) series done on the fifth or sixth postoperative day did not reveal any of the leaks. Cervical esophagogastric anastomosis using an end-to-side circular stapler is feasible and safe, and has comparable outcomes to handsewn anastomosis in regard of leakage rates or other major surgical or general complications. Postoperative GI series seems to be a poor diagnostic tool for anastomotic leakage and could be omitted as a routine study for occult anastomotic leak.