Assuntos
Transtorno Depressivo/economia , Transtorno Depressivo/terapia , Psiquiatria , Estimulação Magnética Transcraniana/economia , Estimulação Magnética Transcraniana/métodos , Custos e Análise de Custo , Transtorno Depressivo/epidemiologia , França/epidemiologia , Hospitalização/economia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Seguro/economia , Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica , Psiquiatria/economia , Psiquiatria/estatística & dados numéricos , Psiquiatria/tendências , Recidiva , Estimulação Magnética Transcraniana/estatística & dados numéricos , Resultado do Tratamento , Recursos HumanosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an effective and well-tolerated treatment in resistant depression with mild to moderate intensity. This indication has not yet been approved in France. The cost and medico-economic value of rTMS in psychiatry remains unknown. The aim of this preliminary study was to assess rTMS cost production analysis as an in-hospital treatment for depression. METHODS: The methodology, derived from analytical accounts, was validated by a multidisciplinary task force (clinicians, public health doctors, pharmacists, administrative officials and health economist). It was pragmatic, based on official and institutional documentary sources and from field practice. It included equipment, staff, and structure costs, to get an estimate as close to reality as possible. First, we estimated the production cost of rTMS session, based on our annual activity. We then estimated the cost of a cure, which includes 15 sessions. A sensitivity analysis was also performed. RESULTS: The hospital production cost of a cure for treating depression was estimated at 1932.94 ( 503.55 for equipment, 1082.75 for the staff, and 346.65 for structural expenses). CONCLUSION: This cost-estimate has resulted from an innovative, pragmatic, and cooperative approach. It is slightly higher but more comprehensive than the costs estimated by the few international studies. However, it is limited due to structure-specific problems and activity. This work could be repeated in other circumstances in order to obtain a more general estimate, potentially helpful for determining an official price for the French health care system. Moreover, budgetary constraints and public health choices should be taken into consideration.