Differences in Krox20-dependent regulation of Hoxa2 and Hoxb2 during hindbrain development.

During hindbrain development, segmental regulation of the paralogous Hoxa2 and Hoxb2 genes in rhombomeres (r) 3 and 5 involves Krox20-dependent enhancers that have been conserved during the duplication of the vertebrate Hox clusters from a common ancestor. Examining these evolutionarily related control regions could provide important insight into the degree to which the basic Krox20-dependent mechanisms, cis-regulatory components, and their organization have been conserved. Toward this goal we have performed a detailed functional analysis of a mouse Hoxa2 enhancer capable of directing reporter expression in r3 and r5. The combined activities of five separate cis-regions, in addition to the conserved Krox20 binding sites, are involved in mediating enhancer function. A CTTT (BoxA) motif adjacent to the Krox20 binding sites is important for r3/r5 activity. The BoxA motif is similar to one (Box1) found in the Hoxb2 enhancer and indicates that the close proximity of these Box motifs to Krox20 sites is a common feature of Krox20 targets in vivo. Two other rhombomeric elements (RE1 and RE3) are essential for r3/r5 activity and share common TCT motifs, indicating that they interact with a similar cofactor(s). TCT motifs are also found in the Hoxb2 enhancer, suggesting that they may be another common feature of Krox20-dependent control regions. The two remaining Hoxa2 cis-elements, RE2 and RE4, are not conserved in the Hoxb2 enhancer and define differences in some of components that can contribute to the Krox20-dependent activities of these enhancers. Furthermore, analysis of regulatory activities of these enhancers in a Krox20 mutant background has uncovered differences in their degree of dependence upon Krox20 for segmental expression. Together, this work has revealed a surprising degree of complexity in the number of cis-elements and regulatory components that contribute to segmental expression mediated by Krox20 and sheds light on the diversity and evolution of Krox20 target sites and Hox regulatory elements in vertebrates.

Hoxa2 and Hoxb2 control dorsoventral patterns of neuronal development in the rostral hindbrain.

Little is known about how the generation of specific neuronal types at stereotypic positions within the hindbrain is linked to Hox gene-mediated patterning. Here, we show that during neurogenesis, Hox paralog group 2 genes control both anteroposterior (A-P) and dorsoventral (D-V) patterning. Hoxa2 and Hoxb2 differentially regulate, in a rhombomere-specific manner, the expression of several genes in broad D-V-restricted domains or narrower longitudinal columns of neuronal progenitors, immature neurons, and differentiating neuronal subtypes. Moreover, Hoxa2 and Hoxb2 can functionally synergize in controlling the development of ventral neuronal subtypes in rhombomere 3 (r3). Thus, in addition to their roles in A-P patterning, Hoxa2 and Hoxb2 have distinct and restricted functions along the D-V axis during neurogenesis, providing insights into how neuronal fates are assigned at stereotypic positions within the hindbrain.

Cross-regulation in the mouse HoxB complex: the expression of Hoxb2 in rhombomere 4 is regulated by Hoxb1.

Correct regulation of the segment-restricted patterns of Hox gene expression is essential for proper patterning of the vertebrate hindbrain. We have examined the molecular basis of restricted expression of Hoxb2 in rhombomere 4 (r4), by using deletion analysis in transgenic mice to identify an r4 enhancer from the mouse gene. A bipartite Hox/Pbx binding motif is located within this enhancer, and in vitro DNA binding experiments showed that the vertebrate labial-related protein Hoxb1 will cooperatively bind to this site in a Pbx/Exd-dependent manner. The Hoxb2 r4 enhancer can be transactivated in vivo by the ectopic expression of Hoxb1, Hoxa1, and Drosophila labial in transgenic mice. In contrast, ectopic Hoxb2 and Hoxb4 are unable to induce expression, indicating that in vivo this enhancer preferentially responds to labial family members. Mutational analysis demonstrated that the bipartite Hox/Pbx motif is required for r4 enhancer activity and the responses to retinoids and ectopic Hox expression. Furthermore, three copies of the Hoxb2 motif are sufficient to mediate r4 expression in transgenic mouse embryos and a labial pattern in Drosophila embryos. This reporter expression in Drosophila embryos is dependent upon endogenous labial and exd, suggesting that the ability of this Hox/Pbx site to interact with labial-related proteins has been evolutionarily conserved. The endogenous Hoxb2 gene is no longer upregulated in r4 in Hoxb1 homozygous mutant embryos. On the basis of these experiments we conclude that the r4-restricted domain of Hoxb2 in the hindbrain is the result of a direct cross-regulatory interaction by Hoxb1 involving vertebrate Pbx proteins as cofactors. This suggests that part of the functional role of Hoxb1 in maintaining r4 identity may be mediated by the Hoxb2 gene.

The cysteine-rich and C-terminal domains of dystrophin are not required for normal costameric localization in the mouse.

Dystrophin has a modular structure and is believed to be critical for muscle cell cytoarchitecture by linking the cytoskeleton to the extracellular matrix. The N-terminus binds to actin and two domains at the C-terminus, the cysteine-rich and C-terminal domains, are associated with the sarcolemma indirectly via the dystroglycan complex. We have generated a mutation in mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells which serves to delete the cysteine-rich and C-terminal domains to address directly their role. We show that these two domains are not necessary for normal costameric organization at the sarcolemma in myotubes derived from the mutant cell line. Furthermore sarcolemmal localization is also apparent in mouse chimaeric muscle in vivo.

The acu-1 gene of Coprinus cinereus is a regulatory gene required for induction of acetate utilisation enzymes.

We have isolated a gene from Coprinus cinereus which cross-hybridises to the facA and acu-5 genes of Aspergillus nidulans and Neurospora crassa, respectively. These genes encode acetyl-CoA synthetase, an enzyme which is inducible by acetate and required for growth on acetate as sole carbon source. We have designated the C. cinereus gene acs-1 and have used transformation to demonstrate its functional homology to the ascomycete genes by complementation of an N. crassa acu-5 mutation. The acs-1 gene has never been identified by mutation; mutations leading to loss of acetyl-CoA synthetase function map to another gene, acu-1. Using Northern analyses we have shown that acu-1 has a regulatory function that is required for acetate-induced transcription of acs-1 and of another acetate utilisation gene, acu-7, the isocitrate lyase structural gene.

Sequence analysis of two exons from the murine dystrophin locus.

We have isolated two genomic clones from the murine dystrophin locus, containing single exons encoding protein sequence from the putative actin-binding domain of the amino-terminus and the terminal portion of the triple helical domain. Using interspecific backcross progeny mice, both clones were shown to be X-linked. Sequence analysis indicated that the amino-terminal clone contains a 173 bp exon exhibiting 90% nucleotide sequence identity to human dystrophin exon 6, whilst the C-terminal clone contains a 61 bp exon with 93% nucleotide sequence identity to the human cDNA sequence.

Co-amplification of L1 line elements with localised low copy repeats in Giemsa dark bands: implications for genome organisation.

A repeat sequence island, located at the A3 Giemsa dark band on the mouse X chromosome and consisting of 50 copies of a localised long complex repeat unit (LCRU), features an unusually high concentration of L1 LINE repeat sequences juxtaposed and inserted within the LCRU. Sequence analysis of three independent genomic clones containing L1 LINE elements juxtaposed with the LCRU demonstrates a common junction sequence at the L1/LCRU boundary, suggesting that the high concentration of L1 LINE sequences in the repeat sequence island has arisen by association of an L1 element with an LCRU followed by amplification. The LCRU target site at this common junction sequence bears no resemblance to the target site of an L1 element inserted within one LCRU, indicating there is no specific preferential target site for L1 integration. We propose that co-amplification of L1 LINE elements with localised low copy repeat families throughout the genome could have a major effect on the chromosomal distribution of L1 LINE elements.