[Mortality and functional independence one year after hip fracture surgery: extracapsular fracture versus intracapsular fracture]. / Mortalité et indépendance fonctionnelle un an après chirurgie pour fracture de l'extrémité supérieure du fémur : comparaison fracture extracapsulaire versus fracture intracapsulaire.

OBJECTIVES: Outcome in hip fracture patients tends to be poor, with an associated death rate of 20 to 33%. The primary aim of our monocentric retrospective study was to compare mortality rates one year after surgery in patients with extracapsular fracture versus patients with intracapsular fracture of the proximal femur. Our secondary aims were the evaluation of functional independence and the rate of institutionalization one year after surgery. METHODS: We compared two groups of 100 patients. The first group had an average age of 83.2 years, and the patients underwent total hip replacement for intracapsular fracture. Patients in the second group, who underwent osteosynthesis for extracapsular fracture, were aged 83.6 years on average. RESULTS: One year post-surgery, there was not a significant difference in mortality between the two groups (23% for extracapsular fracture vs 22% for intracapsular fracture). The rate of independent walking was significantly better in the intracapsular fracture group (42.3% vs 27.3%, p=0.047), and the rate of institutionalization was significantly higher in the extracapsular fracture group (35.8% vs 17.3%, p=0.043). CONCLUSION: Elderly patients with hip fracture are prone to poor outcomes. When compared with osteosynthesis, total hip replacement does not lead to higher mortality rates though it is a more complex surgery. Our findings raise questions regarding of treatment for extracapsular fracture and the choice between osteosynthesis or total hip replacement with a reconstruction of the proximal femur.

Total hip arthroplasty with dual mobility cup in osteonecrosis of the femoral head in young patients: over ten years of follow-up.

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head affects mainly young patients with high functional needs this increases the risk of dislocation. Dual mobility cups known for low rate of dislocation and high mobility range seems indicated. We evaluate functional efficiency, survival and dislocation rate of dual mobility cup for total hip arthroplasty for osteonecrosis in young patients. Monocentric retrospective clinical study, from 2000 to 2008. With a clinical analysis in pre-operative and over ten years of follow-up of one cohort of patients under 55 years old with an indication of THA for ONFH. The judgement criteria was: clinical scores at the maximal follow-up, the dislocation rate, and the cumulate survival rate over ten years follow-up. Forty THA in 31 patients, nine bilateral cases, 23 males and eight females with average age of 44 (±4) years old. In pre-operative: PMA 11 (±3.3), HHS 50,8 (±15.5). At the final follow-up of 129.8 (±33.8) months: PMA (17.4 ± 1.12), HHS (95.7 ± 6.9), no dislocation. We had 11 deaths on average at 95.2 ± 47.3 months. The cumulate survival rate over ten years follow-up is 100% without revisions or long-term dislocation. Analysis concludes to very significant functional improvement without any dislocation despite the young population with high level of activity. Thus, dual mobility cups is a reliable choice preventing dislocation with a very good survival rate without premature wear, preserving mobility and activity.