Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Ib Postgrad Med ; 19(Suppl 1): S58-S67, 2021 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35095372

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Adequate nutrition is needed to enhance the immune system, especially at the time of COVID-19 pandemic for disease prevention and treatment. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to assess physicians' knowledge to nutrition-related issues of COVID-19 infection and explore their attitudes to offering nutritional counselling to patients. METHODOLOGY: This was a cross-sectional online study conducted among doctors in private and public institutions across the six (6) geo-political zones in Nigeria using the social media online platforms of the Nigerian Medical Association (NMA) from August 17 to September 26, 2020. A categorisation of the knowledge score into sufficient and insufficient was done using the mean (sd) knowledge score. The attitude score was categorised into positive and negative using the median (IQR) attitude score, and bivariate analysis was used to test for associations. RESULTS: Responses were gotten from a total of 176 doctors over six weeks of data collection. Majority 97(55.1%) were females, and 84 (47.7%) had practised between 11 and 20 years. Majority 95(54.0%) had insufficient knowledge, while 128(72.7%) of the respondents had a negative attitude to nutrition counselling of patients regarding COVID-19. Females had significantly better knowledge about nutrition-related issues of COVID-19 (p=0.004). However, there was no significant difference in the respondents' attitude based on professional cadre, gender, place of practice, and years of practice. CONCLUSION: Respondents were deficient in the knowledge of common food items containing relevant nutrients essential for boosting immunity. Hence, there is a need to encourage physicians training in nutrition and nutritional counselling.

2.
Niger J Med ; 25(2): 119-27, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29944308

RESUMO

Background: Malaria carries a high case fatality among patients with sickle cell disease. In Jos University Teaching Hospital, at the time of this study, the use of Proguanil was the acceptable mode of chemoprophylaxis for preventing malaria in these patients. Intermittent Preventive Treatment (IPT) with Sulphadoxine-Pyrimethamine [SP] has shown great potential for reducing the prevalence of malaria and anaemia among pregnant women, infants and travellers. We hypothesised that monthly SP was superior to daily Proguanil in reducing malaria parasitaemia, clinical malaria attacks and sickle cell crises in such patients. Objective: To assess the efficacy and affordability of monthly SP versus daily Proguanil for malaria chemoprophylaxis in patients attending Sickle Cell Clinic at Jos University Teaching Hospital, Plateau State, Nigeria. Methods: One hundred and fifty four patients [114 children and 40 adults] with Sickle Cell Disease in their steady state were randomized to monthly SP or daily Proguanil for malaria chemoprophylaxis. Active detection of malaria parasite in the peripheral blood and packed cell volumes were done at each monthly visit to the clinic over a period of three months. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients with malaria parasite in the peripheral blood at the end of 3 months. The secondary outcome measures included episodes of clinical malaria attacks, frequency and type of sickle cell crises and adverse effects of the medication. Results: Ninety four percent [72/77] of patients in the SP group and 91% [70/77] in the Proguanil group respectively completed three months of follow up. SP reduced the prevalence of malaria parasitaemia by 25% [(14%) 10/72] compared to 6.4% [(30%) 21/70] in the proguanil group. [X2 54; p = 0.01]. Seventeen percent [12/72] of the patients receiving monthly SP had malaria attacks compared to 57% [40/70] on prophylaxis with Proguanil. [X2 =25; p< 0.0003]. Thirty three percent [24/72] of the patients receiving SP had at least an episode of bone pain crises compared to 69% [48/70] of the patients receiving Proguanil. [X2 =17.6; p<0.0001]. SP was 8 times cheaper than Proguanil. Conclusion: Monthly chemoprophylaxis with SP was more efficacious than daily Proguanil in reducing the prevalence of asymptomatic malaria parasitaemia, clinical malaria attack and sickle cell crises in patients with sickle cell disease. SP was 8 times cheaper than Proguanil. No significant side effect was recorded in both groups. The current practice of routinely prescribing daily Proguanil to SCD patients for malaria chemoprophylaxis needs to be reviewed.


Assuntos
Anemia Falciforme/tratamento farmacológico , Antimaláricos/administração & dosagem , Malária/prevenção & controle , Proguanil/administração & dosagem , Pirimetamina/administração & dosagem , Sulfadoxina/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Anemia Falciforme/complicações , Quimioprevenção , Esquema de Medicação , Combinação de Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Malária/complicações , Masculino , Nigéria , Parasitemia/epidemiologia , Parasitemia/prevenção & controle , Gravidez , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 72(3): 263-6, 2005 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15772318

RESUMO

While resistance to older antimalarials is increasingly common, newer antimalarials are still not widely available or affordable in much of Africa. Older antimalarials used in combination might be adequately effective in treating uncomplicated malaria. The objective of this study was to determine whether the combination of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) and chloroquine (CQ) is superior to SP alone in the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Nigerian patients. We recruited subjects with malaria, defined as the presence of fever and parasitemia > 2,000/microL, from the outpatient department of a Nigerian teaching hospital. We alternately assigned 280 subjects to receive SP with or without CQ. We assessed clinical and parasitologic responses on days 1, 2, 3, 7, and 14. A total of 114 in the SP + CQ group and 116 in the SP group completed the study. By day 3, 97 (75%) in the SP + CQ group and 52 (42%) in the SP group had cleared their parasitemia (P < 0.001); by day 14, 112 (98%) and 67 (58%), respectively, had cleared their parasitemia (P < 0.001). By day 3, 82 (63%) in the SP + CQ group and 20 (16%) in the SP group were symptom free (P < 0.001). When a modified World Health Organization clinical classification system was used, adequate clinical response occurred in 99 (87%) and 61 (53%) of those in the SP + CQ and SP groups, respectively. RI, RII, and RIII resistance to SP + CQ was 7.9%, 3.5%, and 1.8%, respectively, whereas resistance to SP was 23%, 17%, and 5%, respectively. Combined SP + CQ is superior to SP alone for treatment of uncomplicated malaria in Nigerian patients and may prolong the usefulness of these readily available and affordable drugs.


Assuntos
Antimaláricos/uso terapêutico , Cloroquina/uso terapêutico , Malária/tratamento farmacológico , Pirimetamina/uso terapêutico , Sulfadoxina/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Peso Corporal , Criança , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Nigéria , Parasitemia/classificação , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...