Transesophageal echocardiography guidance for repair of complex cardiac injuries.

Our patient suffered a single stab wound to the heart that resulted in a coronary artery to ventricle fistula, a ventricular septal defect, mitral regurgitation from chordal transection, and a delayed left ventricular aneurysm. We used transesophageal echocardiography to characterize these multiple defects to help guide successful surgical repair. The patient recovered uneventfully.

Propafenone versus ibutilide for post operative atrial fibrillation following cardiac surgery: neither strategy improves outcomes compared to rate control alone (the PIPAF study).

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether acute conversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) with anti-arrhythmic drugs following cardiac surgery restores and/or maintains sinus rhythm or reduces hospital length of stay (LOS). MATERIAL/METHODS: A randomized prospective pilot study was conducted in 2 teaching hospitals from 3/28/98 to 8/2/99 to study the effect of the early use of ibutilide or propafenone on the duration of AF, rhythm at discharge, and LOS. A total of 42 stable patients with new AF after surgery were randomized to oral propafenone (600mg, single dose; n=20), ibutilide (1 mg up to 2 doses if necessary; n=10), or rate control only (n=12). Agents used for rate control were left to the discretion of the primary physician but beta-blockers were encouraged. RESULTS: Pre-randomization distribution of diabetes, CHF, previous AF, and the use of beta-blockers were similar in all groups. At 24 hours 0%, 65% and 34% of patients in the ibutilide (p=0.01), propafenone (p=ns), and rate control groups respectively remained in AF. Although ibutilide decreased AF duration, recurrence rates were 90%, 41%, and 58% in those groups (p=ns compared to rate control). Of the 3 patients who did not convert, all received propafenone. There was no difference in LOS or rhythm at discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Ibutilide but not propafenone decreases the duration of AF after cardiac surgery and neither appears to affect LOS or rhythm at discharge. This data suggests that post operative AF is transient and routine anti-arrhythmic therapy is not necessary for the majority of patients.

Inadvertent stenting of left main coronary artery complicated by later in-stent restenosis.

Stenting of both the protected and unprotected left main coronary artery has been described. This case presents a patient who had inadvertent left main stent deployment. A 47-year-old female presented with a non-Q-wave infarction and subsequent angina leading to angiography and angioplasty of her proximal ramus intermedius artery. Recurrent angina and ECG changes necessitated repeat coronary angiography and angioplasty on the same day with Wiktor stent deployment to treat a resultant dissection. Poststent deployment pictures revealed that the stent had been partially deployed in the left main coronary artery. Additional balloon dilatations were performed at the ostia of the left anterior descending and circumflex arteries through the stent. Three months later the patient presented with progressive angina and was discovered to have severe distal left main stenosis. In a case such as this, stent removal may be preferable to leaving an unnecessary stent within the left main coronary artery. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Intervent. 48:194-197, 1999.