Acute Coronary Syndrome: Treatment Strategies and Outcomes in Patients Admitted to a Tertiary Care Hospital in Palestine.

Background: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is the leading cause of death worldwide despite advances in treatment and prevention measures. This study aimed to explore ACS treatment strategies (ischemia-guided vs early invasive) and risk factors among patients diagnosed with ACS in a tertiary care hospital in Palestine and to evaluate related outcomes regarding future events and standard clinical guidelines. Methods: This retrospective cohort study reviewed patient data from a Palestinian medical hospital. The study included 255 patients ≥ 18 years who were hospitalized between January 2021 and December 2021 and diagnosed with ACS. The data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS). Results: 71% of the participants were males. The mean age was 59.59±11.56 years. Smoking, diabetes, and hypertension were the most common risk factors. Unstable angina (UA) was the most prevalent ACS type, accounting for 43.1% (110) of cases, whereas NSTEMI accounted for 39.2% (100) and STEMI accounted for 17.6% (45) of cases. An ischemic-guided strategy approach was used in 71% (181) of the patients. Upon discharge, the most prescribed medication classes were antiplatelets (97.6%), statins (87.1%), PPIs (72.5%), and antihypertensives (71.8%). Treatment strategies were selected according to the clinical guidelines for most ACS types. Conclusion: ACS management in Palestine continues to evolve to overcome barriers, decrease patient mortality, and decrease hospital stay. UA and NSTEMI were the most common ACS diagnoses at admission, and the ischemic strategy was the most common modality. The findings of this study call for an increased awareness of CVD risk factors, resource availability, and adherence to clinical guidelines to improve patient outcomes and community health.

VTE Prophylaxis Therapy: Clinical Practice vs Clinical Guidelines.

Introduction: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the most preventable complication in hospitalized patients. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the adherence of current clinical practice to the established guidelines at a Palestinian teaching hospital. Methods: This cross-sectional, retrospective, observational study was conducted at a Palestinian Teaching Hospital. The medical records of patients admitted to the medical floor over 18 years of age and hospitalized for longer than 24 hours between January 1 and May 31, 2019, were included. Patients taking anticoagulants with incomplete or duplicated medical records were excluded from the study. A data collection sheet was developed, and clotting and bleeding risks were assessed using the Padua and IMPROVE risk assessment models (scores). The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS (version 25). Results: In total, 408 patients were included in the study, 222 of whom received thromboprophylaxis (54.4%). Of the hospitalized patients, 112 (27.5%) had a high risk of developing VTE (Padua score ≥ 4), and 73 patients were eligible for VTE pharmacological prophylaxis; however, only 44 (60.3%) received the appropriate prophylaxis. In addition, 296 patients had low Padua scores, indicating that pharmacological prophylaxis was not indicated. However, 144 (48.6%) patients received prophylaxis. The mean Padua and IMPROVE risk scores were 2.25 ± 2.08 and 4.44 ± 2.72, respectively. Among the patients, 17.6% had a high risk of bleeding (IMPROVE score ≥ 7). Conclusion: VTE prophylaxis among hospitalized medically ill patients was mostly inappropriate; 80.18% of the patients received inappropriate prophylaxis, and only 60.3% of eligible patients received appropriate prophylaxis. Adapting assessment models or checklists in clinical practice based on clinical guidelines for VTE risk stratification is a practical and effective method to improve VTE prophylaxis management and select the appropriate therapy to prevent toxicity or complication.

Fatal Mucormycosis Post COVID-19 Infection in Uncontrolled Diabetes with Misuse of Glucocorticoids and Antibiotics.

Background: Mucormycosis is a fulminant and rapidly progressing fungal infection associated with a high mortality rate. Mucormycosis is primarily seen in immunocompromised patients, especially those with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (DM), and recently in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. Case Presentation: In this case report, we present a rare case of fatal mucormycosis in Palestine. A 34-year-old Palestinian female patient presented to the emergency department one-month post-COVID-19 infection with left facial pain. During her hospital stay, she deteriorated, with a random blood sugar level of 400 mg/dl and a hemoglobin A1c of 18% with metabolic acidosis and the appearance of swelling and black eschar on her left side of her face. Finally, she was diagnosed with mucormycosis and expired two days later. Conclusion: In this unfortunate case report of mucormycosis, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-Cov-2) infection, delayed diagnosis, misuse of corticosteroids, inappropriate use of antibiotics, and uncontrolled diabetes with ketoacidosis contributed to patient mortality and fatality. Therefore, appropriate patient assessment, rapid diagnosis, and selection of appropriate treatment are important and lifesaving.