Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Echocardiography ; 20 Suppl 1: S19-29, 2003 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23573622

RESUMO

The distinction between viable and nonviable dysfunctional left ventricular (LV) segments after acute myocardial infarction is very important, because revascularization increases survival only in patients with viable myocardial tissue. Recent studies have highlighted a mismatch between two highly specific investigations for viability assessment: dobutamine echocardiography, which measures inotropic reserve, and myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE), which measures microvascular perfusion. Viability and functional reserve are not synonymous. Maintenance of microvascular perfusion, independently of functional reserve, attenuates left ventricular remodelling, reduces the risk of major cardiac events, and increases survival. MCE provides similar perfusion information as myocardial blush, but image quality is much higher. Quantitative analysis of digital data provides more accurate diagnostic MCE information than qualitative analysis of video signal intensity. In a recent study relating MCE findings to histologic data, MCE-derived quantitative data were closely correlated with microvascular density and capillary area, and inversely correlated with collagen content. One of the contrast agents routinely used for MCE is SonoVue, a second generation microbubble contrast agent, which is characterized by high response to ultrasound energy, ease of destruction at high energy, and strong harmonic signal at low energy. Recommendations for the assessment of postischemic LV dysfunction: routine use of MCE, followed by dobutamine echocardiography if perfusion is documented. If MCE is negative, revascularization is not indicated; if both tests are positive, revascularization is strongly recommended; if they are discordant, useful information can be obtained by assessing the extent of 201T1 viability.


Assuntos
Meios de Contraste , Ecocardiografia/métodos , Infarto do Miocárdio/diagnóstico por imagem , Fosfolipídeos , Hexafluoreto de Enxofre , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/diagnóstico por imagem , Dobutamina , Eletrocardiografia , Humanos , Infarto do Miocárdio/fisiopatologia , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica/fisiologia , Sobrevivência de Tecidos/fisiologia , Tomografia Computadorizada de Emissão de Fóton Único , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/fisiopatologia , Remodelação Ventricular/fisiologia
2.
Echocardiography ; 19(7 Pt 2): 627-34, 2002 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12401139

RESUMO

After many years of study and research, the noninvasive assessment of myocardial perfusion by echo contrast agents is becoming a clinical reality. The fast technological progress of echocardiographic imaging and the approval for human use in Europe and the United States of some first and second generation contrast agents explains the growing interest in this new methodology. Recently, a new second generation contrast agent, SonoVue, made of microbubbles stabilized by phospholipids and containing sulphur hexafluoride, has been introduced on the European market. We describe the role of intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography with second-generation contrast agents such as SonoVue in the tailored reperfusion strategies in acute myocardial infarction.


Assuntos
Infarto do Miocárdio/terapia , Reperfusão Miocárdica , Fosfolipídeos , Hexafluoreto de Enxofre , Meios de Contraste , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA