Selective nonoperative management of pharyngoesophageal injuries secondary to penetrating neck trauma: A single-center review of 86 cases.

BACKGROUND: This article describes our experience with penetrating pharyngoesophageal injuries (PEI) in the light of a selective conservative approach, and has the objective to define criteria for nonoperative management (NOM). METHODS: This retrospective single-center review of patients with penetrating neck injury treated for confirmed PEI over a 6-year period aimed to test our proposed hypothesis that NOM is safe for hemodynamically stable patients with PEI, who have no competing indications for exploration, have no established sepsis, and who have a water-soluble contrast swallow either showing no- or a contained extravasation. RESULTS: Eighty-six (9%) patients with PEI (oropharynx, 17; hypopharynx, 40; esophagus, 29) of 948 patients with penetrating neck injury were included. Of the cohort 38 (44%) underwent NOM (oropharynx, 15 [88%]; hypopharynx, 18 [45%]; esophagus, 5 [17%]), and 48 (56%) were managed operatively. The median length of stay was 12 days (interquartile range, 19-8). Fifteen (17%) had a persistent leak and six (7%) mediastinitis. Five (6%) patients died but only one (1%) had isolated PEI. Retrospectively, 27 patients fulfilled our proposed criteria for NOM of which 23 had been treated actively by NOM (oropharynx, 8; hypopharynx, 12; esophagus, 3). For these patients, the length of stay was 10.0 days (interquartile range, 13-6), and none developed deep wound sepsis, mediastinitis, persistent leaks, or died. Of the remaining patients treated by NOM without fulfilling the proposed criteria, two were palliated (esophagus) and 13 were managed actively (oropharynx, 7; hypopharynx, 6). Only four of these patients (oropharynx, 1; hypopharynx, 3) were assessed with water-soluble contrast swallow, which showed noncontained extravasation, and three complicated with persistent leaks. CONCLUSION: Nonoperative management of PEI is safe for a carefully selected subgroup of patients. However, most injuries to the caudal part of the cervical digestive tract mandate urgent exploration. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Clinical Management Study, Level V evidence.

The Selective Non-operative Management of Penetrating Cervical Venous Trauma is Safe and Effective.

BACKGROUND: This paper reviews our experience with penetrating cervical venous trauma and aims to validate the selective non-operative management (SNOM) of these injuries. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained registry. All patients presenting alive with an injury to the internal jugular vein, subclavian vein or innominate vein following a PNI were reviewed for a 6-year period. RESULTS: Among 817 patients admitted for the management of PNI, 76 (9.3%) had a venous injury. Of these, 37 (48.7%) patients were managed non-surgically, 20 (26.3%) required immediate surgical exploration, seven of whom had an associated arterial injury, and 19 (25%) underwent surgery following a diagnostic CTA, 16 of whom had an associated arterial or aero-digestive injury. In total, only 16 (21.1%) of the 76 patients required exploration for venous injury alone. The majority (63.2%) of patients had a history of severe bleeding or hemodynamic instability prior to arrival, but only 20 (26.3%) required immediate exploration. Two (2.6%) patients died as a result of venous injury. No patients developed complications related to the venous injury. CONCLUSIONS: SNOM is applicable to a well-defined subset of patients with isolated penetrating cervical venous trauma to the IJV and SCV identified on CTA.

The role of computed tomography angiography in the detection of aerodigestive tract injury following penetrating neck injury.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to audit our experience with computed tomography angiography (CTA) for the detection of aerodigestive tract injury (ADTI) following penetrating neck injury (PNI) and to assess the significance of deep surgical emphysema on CTA. METHODS: A prospectively maintained trauma registry at the Pietermaritzburg Metropolitan Trauma Service, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa was retrospectively interrogated. The data of all patients with PNI investigated with CTA over a 4-y period were reviewed. All findings of deep surgical emphysema were correlated to an aggregate standard of reference for ADTI as demonstrated by results from clinical examination, surgical neck exploration, endoscopy or contrasted swallow to determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of this finding. RESULTS: A total of 383 patients underwent a CTA for PNI. A total of 94 vascular injuries were identified on 78 positive CTA studies. The sensitivity and specificity of CTA in detecting a vascular injury were 94.4% and 96.7%. Of the 383 patients investigated a total of 38 patients were diagnosed with digestive tract injury (DTI), and all of these patients were found to have deep surgical emphysema on CTA, except for one patient with a clinically insignificant oral cavity injury. Another 126 patients also had deep surgical emphysema on CTA but no DTI. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of deep surgical emphysema for the diagnosis of confirmed DTI in PNI were therefore 97.4%, 63.5%, 22.7%, and 99.5%, respectively. The sensitivity and NPV were, however, 100% when clinically insignificant injuries were excluded. Including patients with confirmed airway injuries and excluding all patients with pneumothoraces yielded a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 94.1%, 71.9%, 30.0%, and 98.9%, respectively, for the identification of ADTI. When excluding surgically irrelevant injuries, the sensitivity and NPV were again both 100%. CONCLUSIONS: CTA for PNI has a high sensitivity and specificity for demonstrating vascular injury. The absence of deep surgical emphysema in the deep cervical fascial planes virtually excludes surgically significant ADTI. The presence of deep surgical emphysema is nonspecific but warrants further investigation.