Patient-reported lower limb edema after primary radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Secondary lymphedema is a known side effect to radiotherapy (RT), but limited information regarding prevalence and risk factors for lower limb edema (LLE) after curative radiotherapy in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) is available. This study provides a descriptive analysis of patient-reported LLE with analysis of risk factors in a cohort of patients with PCa treated with curative RT. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 302 patients with PCa with prospective registration of patient-reported LLE (EORTC QLQ-PR25 (Question 46)) were included. Analysis of LLE was done with the calculation of prevalence rates and Kaplan-Meier statistics. Risk factors for LLE were analyzed multivariate with Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 15 (3-51) months, the overall crude incidence of patients reporting 'quite a bit' or 'a lot' of LLE was 49 (16.2%) and 21 (7.0%), respectively. The baseline prevalence rate of 'quite a bit' and 'a lot' of LLE was 5.0% and 0.8%, respectively. During follow-up the prevalence rate for 'quite a bit' or 'a lot' of LLE increased significantly and remained constant from 6 months where 11.5% (±1.7%) reported 'quite a bit' and 2.9% (±0.5%) reported 'very much' LLE (p < 0.001), respectively.Significant risk factors (p < 0.10) for LLE in univariate analysis included lymph node irradiation (HR:2.325), baseline Body Mass Index (BMI) (HR:1.100), Charlson Comorbidity Index (HR:1.227), Androgen Deprivation Therapy (HR:2,979), and Performance Status (HR:0.594). Only high BMI (HR:1.091) remained significant in multivariate analysis with a three-fold increase in LLE in patients with BMI ≥ 30 compared to normal weight patients. CONCLUSION: Severe patient-reported LLE after curative RT for PCa is rare. Significantly more patients with a high BMI report 'quite a bit' or 'very much' LLE compared to patients with a normal BMI. Obese PCa patients could be offered a rehabilitation program for early detection and management of LLE.

Cabazitaxel - A Treatment Option in Recurrent Platinum-resistant Ovarian Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Treatment of recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer remains challenging due to the development of resistance to chemotherapy. Cabazitaxel is a new taxane that has demonstrated beneficial effect in prostate cancer patients resistant to docetaxel. Therefore, it could be anticipated to possibly also have an effect on chemotherapy resistant ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients with chemotherapy-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer, fallopian tube or peritoneal cancer were treated with cabazitaxel at a dose of 25 mg/m2 (on day 1 of each 3-week cycle), until progression or inacceptable toxicity, between September 2015 and April 2018. The fraction of patients without progression after three months of treatment was the primary endpoint. Prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was prescribed to all patients. RESULTS: The median number of cabazitaxel infusions was 4 (range=1-18). In general, cabazitaxel was well-tolerated. The fraction of patients alive and without progression after 3 months of treatment was 54% (14/26). The response rate was 46% (12/26) according to the Gynecological Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) criteria for CA125. Partial response (PR), evaluated by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), was found in 4/26 patients (15%). By intention-to-treat analysis, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.9 months (95% CI=1.9-4.4) using the combination of CA125 or RECIST (whichever came first), while the median overall survival (OS) was 8.4 months (95% CI=5.1-11.0). CONCLUSION: Cabazitaxel holds promise as a drug in recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. It demonstrated efficacy and in general, the toxicity was manageable.

Prognostic importance of cell-free DNA in chemotherapy resistant ovarian cancer treated with bevacizumab.

AIM: Treatment of multiresistant epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is palliative and patients who have become resistant after multiple lines of chemotherapy often have an unmet need for further and less toxic treatment. Anti-angiogenic therapy has attracted considerable attention in the treatment of EOC in combination with chemotherapy. However, only a minor subgroup will benefit from the treatment and there is an obvious need for new markers to select such patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of single-agent bevacizumab in multiresistant EOC and the importance of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in predicting treatment response. METHODS: One hundred and forty-four patients with multi-resistant EOC were treated with single-agent bevacizumab 10mg/kg every three weeks. Baseline plasma samples were analysed for levels of cfDNA by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). RESULTS: Eighteen percent responded to treatment according to CA125 and 5.6% had partial response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST). Stable disease was seen in 53.5% and 48.6% of the patients by CA125 and RECIST, respectively. Median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 4.2 and 6.7 months, respectively. Cell-free DNA was highly correlated to PFS (p=0.0004) and OS (p=0.005) in both univariate and multivariate analyses (PFS, hazard ratio (HR)=1.98, p=0.002; OS, HR=1.66, p=0.02), as patients with high cfDNA had a poor outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Single-agent bevacizumab treatment in multiresistant EOC appears to be a valuable treatment option with acceptable side-effects. Cell-free DNA showed independent prognostic importance in patients treated with bevacizumab and could be applied as an adjunct for treatment selection.

Immunohistochemical expression of platelet-derived growth factor receptors in ovarian cancer patients with long-term follow-up.

Introduction. The well-documented role of the PDGF system in tumor growth and angiogenesis has prompted the development of new biological agents targeting the PDGF system. The aim of the present study was to analyze the expression of the PDGF-receptors in ovarian cancer and to investigate its relation to histopathological parameters and long-term overall survival. Methods. The immunohistochemical expression of PDGFR-α and PDGFR-ß was investigated in tumor and stromal cells in 170 patients with histologically verified epithelial ovarian cancer. Results. Almost half of the tumor specimens showed high expression of PDGFR-α and PDGFR-ß in tumor cells (43% and 41%) and in stromal compartments (32% and 44%). There was a significant association between high expression of PDGFR-α and high expression of PDGFR-ß in both tumor and stromal cells. Coexpression of PDGFR-α and PDGFR-ß in stromal cells was seen more often in serous adenocarcinomas than in nonserous adenocarcinomas. No clear correlation between PDGFR expression and longterm overall survival or clinical parameters was found. Conclusions. PDGFR-α and PDGFR-ß were expressed in a subset of ovarian carcinomas but did not show significant prognostic importance in this material.

Serum platelet-derived growth factor and fibroblast growth factor in patients with benign and malignant ovarian tumors.

BACKGROUND: New biological markers with predictive or prognostic value are highly warranted in the treatment of ovarian cancer. The platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) system and fibroblast growth factor (FGF) system are important components in tumor growth and angiogenesis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pre-surgery peripheral blood samples were collected consecutively from 213 patients (42 with normal ovaries, 54 with benign, 21 with borderline, and 96 with malignant ovarian tumors) undergoing surgery for an untreated pelvic mass. Serum PDGF-AA, PDGF-BB, and FGF2 were quantified on a Luminex analyzer. RESULTS: Median PDGF-AA, PDGF-BB, and FGF2 levels were higher in patients with ovarian cancer than in those with borderline tumors, and normal ovaries, and PDGF-BB and FGF2 were also higher as compared to patients with benign tumors. PDGF-AA and PDGF-BB were associated with FIGO stage and residual tumor and PDGF-BB was associated with histological subtype. CONCLUSION: PDGF-AA, PDGF-BB, and FGF2 are up-regulated in ovarian cancer and levels of serum PDGF-AA and PDGF-BB seem to be associated with stage and residual tumor in ovarian cancer.

Serial measurements of serum PDGF-AA, PDGF-BB, FGF2, and VEGF in multiresistant ovarian cancer patients treated with bevacizumab.

INTRODUCTION: Anti-VEGF treatment has proven effective in recurrent ovarian cancer. However, the identification of the patients most likely to respond is still pending. It is well known that the angiogenesis is regulated by several other pro-angiogenic proteins, e.g. the platelet - derived growth factor (PDGF) system and the fibroblast growth factor (FGF) system. These other signaling pathways may remain active or become upregulated during anti-VEGF treatment.The aim of the present study was to investigate if potential changes of PDGF-BB, PDGF-AA, and FGF2 before and during bevacizumab treatment had predictive value for early progression or survival. Furthermore, we wanted to investigate the importance of serum VEGF in the same cohort. METHODS: This study included 106 patients with chemotherapy-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer who were treated with single agent bevacizumab as part of a biomarker protocol. Patients were evaluated for response by the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) and/ or Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) CA125 criteria. Serum samples were collected at baseline and prior to each treatment. FGF2, PDGF-BB, PDGF-AA were quantified simultaneously using the Luminex system, and VEGF-A was measured by ELISA. Eighty-eight baseline samples were avaliable for FGF2, PDGF-BB, PDGF-AA analysis, and 93 baseline samples for VEGF. RESULTS: High baseline serum VEGF was related to poor overall survival. Furthermore, high serum PDGF-BB and FGF2 was of prognostic significance. None of the markers showed predictive value, neither at baseline level nor during the treatment.