Clinical and Metabolic Characterization of Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Within the First Year Postpartum.

Context: Women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) have an increased risk of long-term complications, including impaired glucose metabolism, type 2 diabetes (T2DM), cardiovascular disease, and obesity. In current clinical practice, a 1 size fits all approach to GDM is applied, although heterogeneity among women with GDM has been recognized. Objective: To give the most adequate preventive care and postpartum (PP) guidance, we aimed to make a metabolic characterization and identify subgroups of women with previous GDM within the first year PP. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, we collected data in gestational week 34-38, at 3 months, and 1 year PP on women with GDM who participated in a PP follow-up program in Central Region Denmark from April 2019 to December 2022. Results: In total, 1270 women were included in the program in late pregnancy. Of the 768 women participating in either the oral glucose tolerance test 3 months PP (n = 545) or the 1-year follow-up (n = 493) or both (n = 261), 608 (79.2%) were normoglycemic, 137 (17.8%) had prediabetes, 20 (2.6%) had T2DM, and 3 (.4%) had developed T1DM. More than 40% of the women gained weight in the first year PP compared with their pregestational weight. Conclusion: Our study shows that 20.8% of women with GDM who volunteered to participate in a clinical follow-up program developed prediabetes or diabetes (T1DM and T2DM) within the first year PP. The GDM diagnosis encompasses a heterogenetic group of women and a deeper characterization may provide an opportunity for a more personalized risk assessment to prevent the progression to T2DM.

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy: nationwide data from the Danish quality registry for treatment of severe obesity.

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery as treatment of obesity is increasing worldwide. No guidelines exist on which type of bariatric procedure to choose for the individual patient. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to compare Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) with respect to weight loss, complications, comorbidities, and quality of life. SETTING: A nationwide multi-center register-based cohort study. METHODS: We identified 16,053 patients treated by bariatric surgery from 2008 to 2021 (RYGB, n = 13,075; SG, n = 2978) from the Danish quality registry for treatment of severe obesity (DBSO). We calculated risk ratios (RRs) and prevalence ratios (PRs) comparing surgical complications, weight loss, and medical comorbidities by type of procedure up to 2 years after surgery. RESULTS: Patients treated with RYGB experienced a greater weight loss than patients treated by SG both after 1 year (PR, .53; 95% confidence interval [CI], .48-.58) and 2 years (PR, .46; 95% CI, .39-.54). Compared with RYGB, SG yielded a lower risk of readmission (RR, .71; 95% CI, .60-.85). Likewise, the risk of reoperation between 30 days and 1 year (RR, .40; 95% CI, .30-.53) and 1 and 5 years (RR, .15; 95% CI, .12-.20]) were lower following SG. At 1-year follow-up, 76% of patients treated with RYGB and 63% of patients treated with SG experienced diabetes remission. Ten percent and 61% of patients were lost to follow-up after 1 and 2 years, respectively. CONCLUSION: The DBSO is an important resource in studying treatment of severe obesity. Weight loss is slightly greater after RYGB than after SG, but RYGB is associated with more frequent readmissions and reoperations.

Bone Health in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Treated by Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass and the Role of Diabetes Remission.

BACKGROUND: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) has been associated with negative effects on bone. Whether this association is affected by pre-surgical type 2 diabetes (T2D) and surgically induced diabetes remission is unknown. METHODS: In this cross-sectional, matched cohort study 6 years after RYGB, we investigated bone health in 96 individuals with body mass index (BMI) > 35 kg/m2 and T2D (stratified on current diabetes status) treated by RYGB 6 years earlier compared with 49 non-operated individuals with T2D matched with respect to sex, age, and current BMI. Main outcome measures were areal and volumetric bone mineral density (aBMD and vBMD), bone turnover, and odds ratio of osteoporosis/osteopenia. RESULTS: The RYGB group had lower hip (0.916 vs 1.010 g/cm2, p < 0.001), forearm (0.497 g/cm2 vs 0.554 g/cm2, p < 0.001) aBMD, (269.63 mg/cm3 vs 306.07 mg/cm3, p < 0.001) tibial, and radial (238.57 mg/cm3 vs 278.14 mg/cm3, p < 0.0001) vBMD than the control group. Relative to the control group, c-terminal cross-linked telopeptide, procollagen type I amino-terminal propeptide, and osteocalcin were 75%, 41%, and 72% higher in the RYGB group, respectively (all p < 0.001). Odds ratio for osteopenia/osteoporosis in operated individuals was 2.21 (95% CI 1.06; 4.79, p = 0.05). Overall, stratified analysis on current diabetes status did not alter these outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with T2D treated by RYGB, compared to individuals with T2D of similar age and body composition not treated by RYGB, have lower BMD, lower bone strength, and increased levels of several bone turnover markers. Bone health was not associated with current diabetes status in the RYGB group.

Prevalence and geographical distribution of insulin pump therapy in the Central Denmark Region and its association with metabolic parameters.

AIMS: Insulin treatment in type 1 diabetes encompasses multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). Both population-based studies and comparative studies regarding CSII use are sparse. The aim of the current study was to describe the prevalence and distribution of CSII use among adults with type 1 diabetes in the Central Denmark Region and to compare metabolic control in CSII-treated patients to those treated with MDI. METHODS: A database was constructed using the Danish Adult Diabetes Registry in 2014/2015 in combination with an audit of the patients' medical records. RESULTS: 3909 adults with type 1 diabetes patients were included. The proportion of patients treated with CSII differed significantly between the 8 regional hospitals from 12.0% to 31.1%. CSII users had a significantly lower HbA1c compared to MDI treated patients (7.6% (60 mmol/mol) versus 8.0% (64 mmol/mol)) in unadjusted analyses. After adjustment for clinically relevant characteristics the difference between CSII and MDI-treated patients was attenuated, but remained statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The distribution of CSII differed markedly between hospitals and CSII users had better glycemic control, even after adjustment for sex, age, BMI, diabetes duration, smoking, use of lipid-lowering and blood pressure-lowering medication.

Parity and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a study of insulin resistance and ß-cell function in women with multiple pregnancies.

OBJECTIVE: Increasing parity may be a risk factor for the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus and the metabolic alterations during a normal pregnancy induces a prediabetic state; thus, multiple pregnancies may act as a risk factor for development of type 2 diabetes if these physiological alterations in glucose homeostasis are not reversed postpartum. We hypothesize that multiple pregnancies may lead to ß-cell exhaustion and that the insulin resistance that occurs during pregnancy may persist after multiple births. RESEARCH DESIGN AND MEASURES: A total of 28 healthy premenopausal women were recruited: 15 high parity women (≥4 children) and 13 body mass index (BMI)-matched and age-matched low parity women (1 and 2 children). The study consisted of an intravenous glucose tolerance test for assessment of ß-cell function followed by a hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp for assessment of insulin sensitivity. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry was performed to assess body composition. RESULTS: All anthropometric measures, measures of body composition and baseline blood samples were comparable between the 2 groups. Neither first phase insulin release (0-10 min, p=0.92) nor second phase insulin release (10-60 min, p=0.62), both measured as area under the curve, differed between the 2 groups. The M-value, calculated as the mean glucose infusion rate during the last 30 min of the clamp period, was 8.66 (7.70 to 9.63) mg/kg/min in the high parity group compared with 8.41 (7.43 to 9.39) mg/kg/min in the low parity group (p=0.69). CONCLUSIONS: We did not detect any effects of increasing parity on insulin sensitivity or ß-cell function.

Gestational diabetes: A clinical update.

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is increasing in prevalence in tandem with the dramatic increase in the prevalence of overweight and obesity in women of childbearing age. Much controversy surrounds the diagnosis and management of gestational diabetes, emphasizing the importance and relevance of clarity and consensus. If newly proposed criteria are adopted universally a significantly growing number of women will be diagnosed as having GDM, implying new therapeutic challenges to avoid foetal and maternal complications related to the hyperglycemia of gestational diabetes. This review provides an overview of clinical issues related to GDM, including the challenges of screening and diagnosis, the pathophysiology behind GDM, the treatment and prevention of GDM and the long and short term consequences of gestational diabetes for both mother and offspring.

[A 45-fold liraglutide overdose did not cause hypoglycaemia]. / Massiv akut overdosering med liraglutid medførte ikke hypoglykæmi

Glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 analogues such as liraglutide have gained popularity in the treatment of type 2 diabetes over the last years. By mimicking the effects of the native GLP-1, it enhances the glucose-dependent secretion of insulin, suppresses elevated glucagon secretion, increases satiety and slows down gastric emptying. Because of its ways of action it is not likely to cause hypoglycaemia in cases of overdosage. We present a 45-fold overdose of liraglutide (confirmed by P-liraglutide measurements) leading to nausea and vomiting, but no hypoglycaemia and no sign of pancreatitis.