Left atrial volumes assessed by three- and two-dimensional echocardiography compared to MRI estimates.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to establish the accuracy and reproducibility of left atrial volume measurements by three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography compared to 2D biplane and monoplane measurements. BACKGROUND: No echocardiographic technique is generally accepted as optimal for estimation of left atrial size. METHODS: Left atrial volumes of 18 unselected cardiac patients were obtained with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (volumes 145 +/- 58 ml). These volumes were compared with those obtained with different echocardiographic methods: a multiplane 3D method based on 90 images acquired by apical probe rotation, a simplified 3D method using only the three standard apical views, and 2D biplane and monoplane methods based on area-length, disc summation and spherical formulas. RESULTS: The echocardiographic methods significantly underestimated maximum left atrial volumes as obtained by MRI by 14-37% (p < 0.001). Accuracy, expressed as 1 SD of individual estimates around this systematic underestimation, was 25 to 27% for all methods, except for the 2D 2-chamber monoplane method (37%). Interobserver coefficient of variation was between 14 and 20% for all methods (n.s.). CONCLUSION: All echocardiographic methods significantly underestimated left atrial volumes as obtained by MRI. A minor non-significant improvement in individual echocardiographic estimates by the 3D methods was obtained at the cost of more time consumption. In unselected patients ultrasound image quality precludes significant improvement of left atrial volume measurements by the applied 3D methods.

A simplified, practical echocardiographic approach for 3-dimensional surfacing and quantitation of the left ventricle: clinical application in patients with abnormally shaped hearts.

The goal of this study was to validate the quantitative accuracy of a system for 3-dimensional (3D) echocardiographic reconstruction of the left ventricle to assess its volume and function in human beings by using 3 apical views as a simplified technique to promote practical clinical application. End-diastolic and end-systolic volumes (EDV, ESV) and ejection fraction (EF) were obtained by 3D echocardiography in 50 patients with dilated or geometrically distorted left ventricles and compared with values from magnetic resonance imaging (20 consecutive patients), angiography (22 consecutive patients), and radionuclide imaging (8 consecutive patients). Three-dimensional results were also compared with 2-dimensional (2D) echocardiographic estimates. Three-dimensional left ventricular reconstruction provided values that correlated and agreed well with pooled data from the other techniques for EDV (y = 0.93x + 9.1, r = 0.95, standard error of the estimate [SEE] = 15.2 mL, mean difference = -0.5 +/- 15.4 mL), ESV (y = 0.94x + 4.3, r = 0. 96, SEE = 11.4 mL, mean difference = 0.4 +/- 11.5 mL), and EF (y = 0. 90x + 4.1, r = 0.92, SEE = 6.2%, mean difference = -0.9 +/- 6.4%) (all mean differences not significant versus 0), with greater errors by 2D echocardiography. Intraobserver and interobserver variabilities of 3D echocardiography were less than 6% for EDV, ESV, and EF. The overall time for image acquisition and 3D reconstruction was 5 to 8 minutes. Although this 3D method uses only a small number of apical views, it accurately calculates EDV, ESV, and EF in patients with dilated and asymmetric left ventricles and is more accurate than 2D echocardiography. The flexible surface fit used to combine the 3 views provides a convenient visual output as well as quantitation. This simple and rapid 3D method has the potential to facilitate routine clinical applications that assess left ventricular function and changes that occur with remodeling.

Three-dimensional echocardiographic reconstruction: description and applications of a simplified technique for quantitative assessment of left ventricular size and function.

A simplified system for three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of the left ventricle and quantitation of its size and function is described. This system requires the acquisition of a minimum number of two-dimensional (2D) echocardiographic apical views, which are obtained by rotation of the probe about the initial imaging point. Traced endocardial borders are spatially reconstructed according to the common apex and longitudinal axis of the views and to the measured or assumed angular relation between scanned planes. This technique has been applied in vitro to regular and irregular ventricular phantoms, yielding excellent accuracy for volume calculation. Also, it has been applied clinically for left ventricular volume, stroke volume, and ejection fraction calculation in both normal subjects and patients with various cardiac diseases, providing good results compared with other independent imaging techniques and showing increased accuracy with respect to 2D echocardiographic methods. Because this is obtained without substantial increase in time, effort, or cost, this simplified technique for 3D reconstruction should therefore be of value in daily clinical echocardiographic practice.

Evaluation of reference systems for quantitative wall motion analysis from three-dimensional endocardial surface reconstruction: an echocardiographic study in subjects with and without myocardial infarction.

Six relevant computer-implemented reference systems for three-dimensional quantitative assessment of left ventricular wall motion abnormalities were compared with visual wall motion analysis of two-dimensional images. Endocardial borders were traced in three apical echocardiographic views at end-diastole and end-systole in 10 patients with myocardial infarction and 5 healthy subjects, and three-dimensional reconstruction of endocardial surfaces was performed. End-diastolic and end-systolic surfaces were aligned in a common axis system depending on the reference system, and systolic wall motion was assessed at 1,024 points on the endocardial surface. The localization of abnormal wall motion was displayed in bull's-eye maps, and the area was determined as a percentage of total endocardial area. For each reference system, the segmental concordance between three-dimensional computerized and visual assessment was determined. The best agreement between computerized and visual analysis was obtained with a reference system based on wall motion towards the major ventricular axis, whereas the poorest result was obtained using the center of left ventricular cavity as reference. Correlation between the estimated area of wall motion abnormality and visually determined wall motion score index was best using the aligned center of mitral valve plane as reference (r = .92).

A new method for echocardiographic computerized three-dimensional reconstruction of left ventricular endocardial surface: in vitro accuracy and clinical repeatability of volumes.

This study evaluates the in vitro accuracy and clinical repeatability of volumes derived by a new algorithm for three-dimensional reconstruction of cavity surfaces based on echocardiographic apical images obtained by probe rotation. The accuracy of the method was tested in latex phantoms (true volumes, 32 to 349 cm3) with (n = 9) or without (n = 9) rotational symmetry around the midcavitary long axis. Repeatability of left ventricular volumes was assessed in subjects without (n = 5) or with (n = 10) myocardial disease. Estimated phantom volumes obtained from four (three) imaging planes were close to true volumes with a mean difference +/- SD of 0 +/- 2 (2 +/- 3) cm3 in symmetric and 1 +/- 3 (4 +/- 4) cm3 in asymmetric objects. Biplane and single-plane volume estimates were less accurate. Interobserver and intraobserver repeatability of three-dimensional left ventricular volumes was good for analysis (coefficients of variation: 3.5% to 6.2%) and was lower for recording (coefficients of variation: 7.4% to 10.9%). Hence the present algorithm reproduces volumes of symmetric and deformed in vitro objects accurately over a wide range of size and shape, and it produces repeatable left ventricular volumes in the clinical situation.

Three-dimensional echocardiography for quantitative left ventricular wall motion analysis: a method for reconstruction of endocardial surface and evaluation of regional dysfunction.

A method for quantitative LV wall motion analysis based on 3-D reconstruction of the LV endocardial surface is presented. The reconstruction is based on a minimum of three transthoracic apical 2-D cineloops of the LV, digitally transferred from the ultrasound scanner to a computer. Images are obtained by rotating the transducer around the LV long axis. Endocardial borders are traced with an automatic edge detection algorithm with manual correction. These borders are used with a specially designed computer algorithm for reconstruction of LV cavity 3-D shape, and LV volumes, ejection fraction, and endocardial surface area can be determined. The end-diastolic and end-systolic endocardial surfaces are compared for analysis of regional wall motion. A threshold value is selected to discriminate between normal and abnormal wall motion. Regional wall motion abnormalities are displayed in a bull's eye plot, and the corresponding endocardial surface area is expressed in percent of the total endocardial area. Phase analysis is performed from reconstruction of the endocardial surface throughout the cardiac cycle, and displays regions with abnormal wall motion as being out of phase with LV volume variation. Thus, LV 3-D reconstruction performed by this method can be used for quantitative analysis of wall motion in several clinical situations, and due to the simplicity of processing the data, can be useful outside the research laboratory.