Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg ; 33(7): 1512-1520, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38311100

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Optimal pain control methods after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) achieve reduced opioid consumption, shortened hospital stay, and improved patient satisfaction in addition to adequate analgesia. Interscalene brachial plexus block is the gold standard for TSA, yet it typically does not provide pain relief lasting beyond 24 hours. Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) purportedly provides prolonged analgesia, yet it has been minimally explored for interscalene block, and it is significantly more expensive than standard bupivacaine. METHODS: This is a prospective, 2-arm, double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Subjects presenting for anatomic or reverse TSA were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive interscalene brachial plexus block with either LB plus bupivacaine (LBB group) or bupivacaine plus dexamethasone and epinephrine (BDE group). The primary outcome was 120-hour postoperative opioid consumption. Secondary outcomes were pain scores up to 96 hours postoperatively, pain control satisfaction, complications, level of distress from block numbness, and hospital stay. RESULTS: Ninety patients, 45 per group, were included in the intention-to-treat analysis and randomized. Because of withdrawal of consent and loss to follow-up, 40 in each group completed enrollment through postoperative day 60. Total 120-hour postoperative opioid consumption was similar between groups (P = .127), with no differences within 24- or 48-hour time intervals. Postoperative pain scores at 24-48 hours, 48-72 hours, 72-96 hours, and day 60 were significantly lower for the LBB group. DISCUSSION: LB interscalene brachial plexus block before total shoulder arthroplasty did not reduce 120-hour postoperative opioid consumption but significantly reduced postoperative pain between 24 and 96 hours and at postoperative day 60.


Assuntos
Anestésicos Locais , Artroplastia do Ombro , Bupivacaína , Lipossomos , Dor Pós-Operatória , Humanos , Bupivacaína/administração & dosagem , Método Duplo-Cego , Masculino , Feminino , Artroplastia do Ombro/métodos , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Idoso , Bloqueio do Plexo Braquial/métodos , Medição da Dor , Epinefrina/administração & dosagem , Dexametasona/administração & dosagem , Manejo da Dor/métodos
2.
Clin Spine Surg ; 36(4): E131-E134, 2023 05 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36097343

RESUMO

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the utility of the erector spinae plane regional anesthesia (ESP) block in reducing opioid medication usage and postanesthesia care unit length of stay (PACU-LOS) for patients undergoing either a posterior or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions (PLIF/TLIF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Posterior lumbar spine fusion is a common surgical procedure typically associated with significant postoperative pain. Poorly controlled postoperative pain can lead to a number of poor outcomes. Although opioids are a mainstay for pain control, they are associated with adverse effects and a risk of dependence. Therefore, multimodal pain control has become more prevalent in orthopedics and combines traditional opioid and nonopioid pain mediation with general anesthesia protocols and regional nerve blocks. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted for patients undergoing PLIFs or TLIFs between 2019 and 2021. Patients were placed into 2 groups, those receiving an ESP block and those that did not. T tests assuming unequal variances were used to assess differences in pain scores, opioid consumption, and PACU-LOS between groups. RESULTS: The study group demonstrated a 35% reduction in opioid use ( P =0.016), a 16% reduction in pain with activity ( P =0.042), and a 9.7% reduction in pain at rest ( P =0.219) compared with the control group. There were no significant differences in PACU-LOS between groups ( P =0.314). CONCLUSION: The use of an ESP block for patients undergoing PLIFs and TLIFs appears to be a safe and effective means to manage postoperative pain and reduce opioid consumption.


Assuntos
Bloqueio Nervoso , Fusão Vertebral , Humanos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Fusão Vertebral/efeitos adversos , Bloqueio Nervoso/efeitos adversos , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle
4.
Spine J ; 22(10): 1660-1665, 2022 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35533987

RESUMO

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) is a well-established technique to address numerous pathological conditions of the spine and to restore sagittal spine balance. Improving patient comfort and reducing opioid consumption following lumbar fusions is a significant goal for spine surgeons. Therefore, there is a growing need to explore multimodal options for pain management post-surgery. PURPOSE: Determine the effectiveness of combined transversus abdominis plane (TAP) and rectus sheath (RS) blocks in those undergoing (ALIF) as compared to a historical control. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective comparative cohort performed at a tertiary referral orthopedic specialty hospital. PATIENT SAMPLE: Of the 175 patients (88 patients received a combined regional block) who underwent an ALIF between January 1, 2018 and August 1, 2021. OUTCOME MEASURES: Pain scores both during activity and at rest, opioid consumption during the first 72 hours postoperatively, total postoperative anesthesia care unit length of stay (PACU LOS), 30-day emergency department visits, 30-day readmissions, and unplanned returns to the operating room. METHODS: Charts of patients undergoing an ALIF during the open period for this study were placed into two groups: those that received combined regional anesthesia and those that did not. A t test assuming unequal variances was used to determine if there were differences in outcome variables between the two groups. RESULTS: The study group, those receiving the combine block, demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in opioid pain medicine (24.8%), reported pain (10-13%), and PACU LOS (18.7%). There were no differences in complication rates between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The combined use of TAP and RS blocks appears to be a well-tolerated and effective means of pain management in this patient cohort.


Assuntos
Bloqueio Nervoso , Músculos Abdominais , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Bloqueio Nervoso/efeitos adversos , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...