Dynamic evaluation of renal resistive index in normoalbuminuric patients with newly diagnosed hypertension or type 2 diabetes.

AIM/HYPOTHESIS: Renal resistive index is a useful measure for quantifying alterations in renal blood flow. In the present study we evaluated resistive index at baseline and after vasodilation induced by nitroglycerine in normoalbuminuric patients with type 2 diabetes or essential hypertension, relating the values to indices of systemic vascular dysfunction. METHODS: Newly diagnosed treatment-naïve type 2 diabetic (n = 32) and hypertensive patients (n = 49) were compared with 27 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. Renal resistive index was obtained by duplex ultrasound at baseline and after 25 µg sublingual nitroglycerine. Endothelium-dependent (flow-mediated dilation) and -independent (response to nitroglycerine) vasodilation in the brachial artery was assessed by computerised edge detection system. Carotid-femoral pulse-wave velocity and augmentation index were assessed by applanation tonometry. Nitrotyrosine levels, an index of oxidative stress, were also measured. RESULTS: Resistive index was higher in diabetic than in hypertensive patients and controls (p < 0.001), while changes in resistive index induced by nitroglycerine were lower in hypertensive patients compared with controls (p < 0.01), and were further reduced in type 2 diabetic patients. Hypertensive and diabetic patients showed significantly increased arterial stiffness, nitrotyrosine levels and reduced endothelial function than controls (p < 0.05). Changes in resistive index induced by nitroglycerine were independently related to serum glucose, reactive hyperaemia and aortic pulse-wave velocity in the overall population. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: These results support the dynamic evaluation of renal resistive index as an early detector of renal vascular alterations in the presence of type 2 diabetes and hypertension, even before the onset of microalbuminuria.

Effect of verapamil, trandolapril and their combination on vascular function and structure in essential hypertensive patients.

AIM: The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effect of treatment with verapamil, trandolapril and their combination on peripheral microcirculation vasoreactivity. METHODS: Twenty hypertensive patients were randomized to receive oral trandolapril (4 mg oid; TRA) or verapamil (240 mg oid; VER) for 6 months and then the combination of the two drugs for additional 6 months. At baseline, 6 months and 12 months, peripheral microcirculation vasoreactivity was evaluated by forearm blood flow technique (venous plethysmography), as vasodilation to an endothelium-dependent (acetylcholine) and an endothelium-independent stimulus (sodium nitroprusside, SNP); minimal forearm vascular resistances (MFVR) were also evaluated. RESULTS: Blood pressure decreased similarly and progressively in both groups throughout the study period. In VER, 6-month verapamil treatment significantly increased vasodilation to acetylcholine, but not to SNP. The superimposition of trandolapril increased the response to SNP, and less to acetylcholine. In TRA group, 6-month treatment with trandolapril improved the response to SNP, but not to acetylcholine. In this group, the superimposition of verapamil caused a significant improvement in the response to acetylcholine, but not to SNP. At the end of the study, MFVR were significantly reduced in both groups, but to a greater extent in TRA. CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrates that chronic treatment with verapamil ameliorates endothelial function in the forearm microcirculation of essential hypertensive patients, while trandolapril protects microcirculation from structural alterations. The combination of the two drugs is potentially a powerful tool to counteract hypertension-related microvascular dysfunction and damage.

Effect of nebivolol on QT dispersion in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy.

Hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) have increased QT dispersion, which is considered an early indicator of end-organ damage and a non-invasive marker of risk for clinically important ventricular arrhythmias and cardiac mortality. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of nebivolol antihypertensive therapy on QT dispersion in hypertensive subjects. Twenty-five subjects (15 men and 10 women, mean age 53.6 +/- 4.5 years) with essential arterial hypertension and mild-to-moderate LVH (blood pressure: 147.2 +/- 6.2/90.6 +/- 3.8 mmHg; left ventricular mass indexed: 149.1 +/- 10.7 g/m(2)) were compared with 25 age-matched healthy control subjects. All the participants underwent a complete clinical examination, including electrocardiogram for QT interval measurements. The QT dispersion was defined as the difference between the longest and the shortest QT interval occurring in the 12-lead electrocardiogram. The QT dispersion was corrected (QTc) with Bazett's formula. Hypertensive subjects were treated with 5 mg daily of nebivolol. The ECG and echocardiogram were repeated after four weeks of treatment. At baseline, hypertensive patients showed QT dispersion (56.9 +/- 6.4 vs. 31.7 +/- 8.4 ms, P < 0.001) and QTc dispersion (58.3 +/- 6.2 vs. 33.2 +/- 7.8 ms, P < 0.001) significantly higher than control subjects. Four-week nebivolol treatment reduced blood pressure from 147.2 +/- 6.2/90.6 +/- 3.6 mmHg to 136.3 +/- 3.1/83.3 +/- 2.5 mmHg (P < 0.0001), and resting heart rate from 75.3 +/- 4.7 to 64.2 +/- 3.0 bpm (P < 0.001), without significant change in left ventricular mass (LVMi: 149.1 +/- 10.7 vs. 151.4 +/- 9.8 g/m(2), ns). Nebivolol-based treatment improved QT dispersion (56.9 +/- 6.4 vs. 40.5 +/- 5.8 ms, P < 0.001) and QTc dispersion (58.3 +/- 6.2 vs. 42.2 +/- 5.6 ms, P < 0.001), which remained higher than in control subjects (P < 0.001 in both cases). The reduction of QT dispersion did not correlate with arterial BP reduction. In conclusion, nebivolol reduced increased QT dispersion in hypertensive subjects after four weeks. This effect, occurred without any change in LVM, did not seem to be related to the blood pressure lowering and could contribute to reduce arrhythmias as well as sudden cardiac death in at-risk hypertensive patients.

Mechanisms responsible for endothelial dysfunction induced by fasting hyperhomocystinemia in normotensive subjects and patients with essential hypertension.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate whether fasting hyperhomocystinemia reduces endothelial function by oxidative stress in normotensive subjects and hypertensive patients. BACKGROUND: Subjects with hyperhomocystinemia have endothelial dysfunction. METHODS: In 23 normotensive subjects and 28 hypertensive patients, classified into normohomocystinemic and hyperhomocystinemic groups according to homocysteine plasma levels (< 8.7 and >14.6 micromol/l, respectively), we studied forearm blood flow changes (strain-gauge plethysmography) induced by intrabrachial administration of acetylcholine (0.15 to 15 microg/100 ml tissue per min) or sodium nitroprusside (1 to 4 microg/100 ml per min), an endothelium-dependent and -independent vasodilator, respectively. Acetylcholine was repeated with N(G)-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA; 100 microg/100 ml per min), vitamin C (8 mg/100 ml per min) and L-NMMA plus vitamin C. RESULTS: Normotensive hyperhomocystinemic patients showed a blunted response to acetylcholine and a lower inhibiting effect of L-NMMA on acetylcholine, as compared with normohomocystinemic patients. Although vitamin C was ineffective in normohomocystinemic subjects, it increased the response to acetylcholine and restored the inhibiting effect of L-NMMA on acetylcholine in hyperhomocystinemic patients. Hypertensive hyperhomocystinemic patients showed a reduced response to acetylcholine, as compared with normohomocystinemic subjects. In both subgroups, L-NMMA failed to blunt the response to acetylcholine. The potentiating effect of vitamin C on acetylcholine was greater in hyperhomocystinemic patients than in normohomocystinemic subjects, although it restored the inhibitory effect of L-NMMA on acetylcholine-induced vasodilation to the same extent in both groups. Hyperhomocystinemia did not change the response to sodium nitroprusside. CONCLUSIONS: In normotensive subjects and hypertensive patients, hyperhomocystinemia impairs endothelium-dependent vasodilation. It could be related to oxidant activity.

Effect of calcium antagonist or beta blockade treatment on nitric oxide-dependent vasodilation and oxidative stress in essential hypertensive patients.

OBJECTIVES: Essential hypertension is associated with impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation caused by oxygen free radical-induced nitric oxide (NO) breakdown. Since calcium antagonists can improve endothelial function in hypertensive patients, we tested whether this beneficial effect could be related to restoration of NO availability by antioxidant activity. METHODS: In 10 healthy subjects and 20 essential hypertensive patients, we studied forearm blood flow (strain-gauge plethysmography) modifications induced by intrabrachial acetylcholine (from 0.15-15 microg/100 ml per min), bradykinin (0.005-0.05 microg/100 ml per min), two endothelium-dependent vasodilators, and sodium nitroprusside (1-4 microg/100 ml forearm tissue per min), an endothelium independent vasodilator, in the absence and presence of NG-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA) (100 microg/100 ml forearm tissue per min), an NO synthase inhibitor. RESULTS: In controls, vasodilation to acetylcholine and bradykinin was inhibited by L-NMMA. In hypertensive patients, vasodilation to acetylcholine and bradykinin, but not to sodium nitroprusside, was blunted and resistant to L-NMMA. Hypertensive patients were randomized to a 12-week treatment with lacidipine (4-6 mg/daily) or atenolol (50-100 mg/daily) (n = 10 each group). Lacidipine but not atenolol increased the vasodilation to acetylcholine and bradykinin and restored the inhibiting effect of L-NMMA on endothelium-dependent vasodilation, without affecting the response to sodium nitroprusside. Moreover, lacidipine reduced circulating markers of oxidative stress including plasma and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) hydroperoxides, the susceptibility of LDL to Cu2+-induced oxidation and the reactive oxygen species generated from human umbilical vein endothelial cells after incubation with LDL derived from plasma of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Lacidipine increases endothelium-dependent vasodilation by restoring NO availability, and this effect possibly is related to antioxidant activity.

Age-related reduction of NO availability and oxidative stress in humans.

Age-related endothelial dysfunction could be caused by an alteration in the L-arginine-NO system and the production of oxidative stress in both normotensive and hypertensive individuals. In 47 normotensive subjects and 49 patients with essential hypertension, we evaluated forearm blood flow (by strain-gauge plethysmography) modifications induced by intrabrachial sodium nitroprusside (1, 2, and 4 microg/100 mL per minute) and acetylcholine (0.15, 0.45, 1.5, 4.5, and 15 microg/100 mL per minute), an endothelium-independent vasodilator and an endothelium-dependent vasodilator, respectively. Acetylcholine was repeated in the presence of the NO synthase inhibitor N(G)-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA, 100 microg/100 mL per minute), the antioxidant vitamin C (8 mg/100 mL per minute), or both. Vasodilation to acetylcholine, but not to sodium nitroprusside, was lower (P<0.01) in hypertensive patients compared with control subjects. Moreover, in both groups, endothelium-dependent vasodilation declined with aging. In normotensive subjects, the inhibiting effect of L-NMMA on response to acetylcholine decreased in parallel with advancing age, whereas vitamin C increased vasodilation to acetylcholine in only the oldest group (age >60 years). In young hypertensive patients (age <30 years), vasodilation to acetylcholine was sensitive to L-NMMA, whereas in hypertensive patients age >30 years, vitamin C enhanced endothelium-dependent vasodilation and restored the inhibiting effect of L-NMMA on response to acetylcholine. In normotensive individuals, an earlier primary dysfunction of the NO system and a later production of oxidative stress cause age-related reduction in endothelium-dependent vasodilation. These alterations are similar but anticipated in hypertensive patients compared with normotensive subjects.

Role of endothelin in the control of peripheral vascular tone in human hypertension.

Endothelins are potent 21 amino acid vasoconstrictor isopeptides produced in different vascular tissues, including vascular endothelium. Endothelin-1 is the main endothelin generated by the endothelium and probably the most important in the cardiovascular system. Endothelin-1 acts through specific receptors termed ET(A), represented only on smooth muscle cells and having the function of growth promotion and mediating contractions, and ET(B), located both on smooth muscle cells, where they evoke contractions, and on endothelial cells, inducing relaxation by production of the endothelium-derived relaxing factor nitric oxide. In physiological conditions endothelin-1 administration causes vasodilation and vasoconstriction at low and high concentrations, respectively. However, administration of mixed ET(A)/(B) receptor antagonists causes slight or absent vasodilation, indicating that the direct vasoconstrictor effect of the peptide is probably masked by ET(B)-induced NO-dependent vasodilation. In essential hypertensive patients, the activity of exogenous endothelin-1 is either increased, similar or decreased as compared to normotensive subjects, depending on which vascular district or scheme of administration is considered. But although available evidence does not indicate increased endothelin-1 plasma levels in patients with essential hypertension, simultaneous antagonism of ET(A)/(B) receptors causes a greater degree of vasodilation in hypertensives than in normotensive subjects. Moreover administration of a selective ET(B) receptor antagonist causes vasoconstriction in normotensive subjects and vasodilation in essential hypertensive patients. Finally, the vasodilating effect of a mixed ET(A)/(B) receptor antagonist is inversely related to NO availability. Taken together these findings suggest that essential hypertension is characterized by increased endothelin-1 vasoconstrictor tone. This alteration seems to be dependent on decreased endothelial ET(B)-mediated NO production attributable to impaired NO availability. In such conditions endothelial ET(B)-induced vasodilation no longer compensates for the direct classical endothelin vasoconstrictor effect mediated by smooth muscle cell ET(A) and ET(B) receptors. Therefore endothelin-1 could potentially be involved in the pathogenesis of essential hypertension or of its complications, and blockade of this system is a fascinating new target for therapeutic intervention in this disease.

Effect of acute blood pressure reduction on endothelial function in the brachial artery of patients with essential hypertension.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effect of acute blood pressure reduction on endothelium-dependent vasodilation in the peripheral circulation of essential hypertensive patients. DESIGN: A parallel group study; endothelial function measured in 64 essential hypertensive patients before and after (2 h) treatment with nifedipine (20 mg, n = 32) or captopril (50 mg, n = 32), p.o., randomly assigned. METHODS: In hypertensive patients, we evaluated flow-mediated, endothelium-dependent dilation (FMD, high resolution ultrasound) of the brachial artery compared with endothelium-independent response to glyceryl trinitrate (GTN, 25 microg s.l.). Automatic computerized analysis was used to measure brachial artery diameter on end-diastolic frames acquired every second during the study. Sixty-six healthy normotensive subjects were also evaluated to assess the presence of endothelial dysfunction in hypertensive patients. RESULTS: Hypertensive patients showed a significantly (P< 0.01) lower FMD (5.9 +/- 2.5%) as compared to healthy controls (7.7 +/- 3.8%). The response to GTN was similar in normotensive subjects (7.5 +/- 3.1%) and hypertensive patients (7.2 +/- 6.5%). At baseline brachial artery diameter, FMD and response to GTN were similar in the nifedipine- and captopril-treated groups. Nifedipine and captopril similarly reduced blood pressure, but only nifedipine increased heart rate. Acute nifedipine, but not captopril, significantly (P< 0.01) increased brachial artery diameter, while FMD and response to GTN were not modified after nifedipine or captopril. CONCLUSIONS: Endothelial dysfunction in the brachial artery of essential hypertensive patients is not improved by acute blood pressure reduction.

Restoration of nitric oxide availability after calcium antagonist treatment in essential hypertension.

Essential hypertension is associated with impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation caused by oxygen free radical-induced nitric oxide (NO) breakdown. Because calcium antagonists can improve endothelial function in patients with essential hypertension, in this study we tested the hypothesis that this beneficial effect could be related to restoration of NO availability by antioxidant properties. In 15 healthy subjects and 15 hypertensive patients, we studied forearm blood flow (strain-gauge plethysmography) modifications induced by intrabrachial acetylcholine (ACh; 0.15, 0.45, 1.5, 4.5, and 15 microg/100 mL per minute), an endothelium-dependent vasodilator in basal conditions, during infusion of N:(G)-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA, 100 microg/100 mL forearm tissue per minute), an NO-synthase inhibitor, vitamin C (8 mg/100 mL forearm tissue per minute), and finally, simultaneous infusion of L-NMMA and vitamin C. The response to sodium nitroprusside (SNP; 1, 2, and 4 microg/100 mL forearm tissue per minute) was also evaluated. In control subjects, vasodilation to ACh was inhibited by L-NMMA and not changed by vitamin C. In hypertensive patients, vasodilation to ACh was blunted as compared with control subjects and resistant to L-NMMA. Vitamin C, which decreased plasma isoprostanes and increased plasma antioxidant capacity, increased the response to ACh and restored the inhibiting effect of L-NMMA. In hypertensive patients, the study was repeated after 3-month treatment with nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (30 to 60 mg/daily). Nifedipine treatment decreased circulating plasma lipoperoxides and isoprostanes and increased plasma antioxidant capacity. Moreover, nifedipine increased the vasodilation to ACh but not to SNP and restored the inhibiting effect of L-NMMA on ACh-induced vasodilation, whereas vitamin C no longer exerted its facilitating activity. These results indicate that nifedipine increases endothelium-dependent vasodilation by restoring NO availability, an effect probably determined by antioxidant activity.

Early impairment of coronary flow reserve and increase in minimum coronary resistance in borderline hypertensive patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate relations between coronary flow velocity and myocardial oxygen demand at rest, as well as coronary vasodilator capacity and flow reserve, in asymptomatic subjects with borderline hypertension as compared to normotensive controls and patients with sustained high blood pressure (HBP) and without left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty-two asymptomatic males were studied: 13 healthy normotensive volunteers; 12 subjects with borderline HBP and 17 asymptomatic subjects with sustained systemic hypertension. Coronary flow velocity in left anterior descending artery and coronary flow reserve were assessed by transesophageal echo-doppler at baseline and during intravenous adenosine infusion. Left ventricular mass, peak systolic wall stress (PSWS; Pa), and midwall fractional shortening (MFS; %) were obtained from M-mode images of the left ventricle in transthoracic long-axis view and in transesophageal transgastric view. RESULTS: Coronary flow velocity at baseline was not significantly different in the three groups, despite significantly higher rate-pressure product (RPP) in the hypertensive groups as compared with controls. Only in control subjects, was resting coronary flow velocity significantly correlated with RPP (y = 4279 + 200x, r = + 0.58, P < 0.05) and PSWS (y = 17.2 + 5.1 x, r = + 0.62, P < 0.05). Coronary reserve was 3.5 +/- 0.65 in controls and significantly lower (P < 0.05) in borderline hypertensive (2.87 +/- 0.46) and in sustained hypertensive subjects (2.66 +/- 0.56). Minimum coronary resistance was significantly increased in both hypertensive groups (1.30 +/- 0.29 and 1.39 +/- 0.48 mmHg/s per cm) as compared to normotensive controls (0.93 +/- 0.20 mmHg/s per cm, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In asymptomatic subjects with borderline hypertension and without LVH, a significant reduction in coronary flow reserve is already detectable and appears almost entirely related to an impaired coronary vasodilator capacity rather than to an increased myocardial oxygen demand.

Effect of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker candesartan on endothelial function in patients with essential hypertension.

Patients with essential hypertension are characterized by impaired basal and agonist-evoked nitric oxide release and increased endogenous endothelin (ET)-1-induced vasoconstriction. To assess whether candesartan, an angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker, can improve endothelial function, we studied the changes in forearm blood flow (FBF) induced in 15 hypertensive patients and in 15 control subjects by the intrabrachial infusion of N(G)-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA), norepinephrine, the ET A/B receptor antagonist TAK 044, sodium nitroprusside, and acetylcholine. In hypertensive patients, the FBF study was repeated 2 and 12 months after the start of treatment with candesartan cilexetil (8 to 16 mg daily). Compared with controls (maximal FBF decrease, -46+/-11%), hypertensive patients showed a reduced (P<0.001) vasoconstrictor response to L-NMMA (maximal FBF decrease, -28+/-7%); the response to norepinephrine was only slightly impaired, and the response to sodium nitroprusside was similar to that of controls. Finally, TAK-044 caused greater vasodilation in hypertensive patients (maximal FBF increase, 77+/-9%) than in controls (maximal FBF increase, 17+/-10%). In hypertensive patients, candesartan cilexetil significantly enhanced vasoconstriction to L-NMMA after 2 and 12 months (maximal FBF decrease, 37+/-2% [P<0.05] and 42+/-2% [P<0.001], respectively). The responses to norepinephrine, acetylcholine, and sodium nitroprusside were not modified after 2 months. After 12 months, the responses to acetylcholine and sodium nitroprusside were significantly (P<0.05) enhanced at the highest rates. Vasodilation to TAK-044 was abolished after treatment with candesartan cilexetil; this effect is associated with a reduced plasma ET-1 concentration. This study demonstrated that the angiotensin II receptor blocker candesartan improves tonic nitric oxide release and reduces vasoconstriction to endogenous ET-1 in the forearm of hypertensive patients.

Utility of plasma dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate determination in adrenal incidentalomas.

To evaluate whether low DHEA-S levels are predictors of cortical origin, benignity and hormonal activity in incidentally detected adrenal masses, thirty-five patients with adrenal incidentalomas were studied. All patients were operated on and the diagnosis was histologically confirmed. Basal endocrine workup included plasma determination of cortisol before and after dexamethasone (1 mg overnight), plasma ACTH (08:00 h), 17-OH-progesterone, testosterone and potassium, standing plasma renin activity and aldosterone, supine and standing plasma noradrenaline and adrenaline. If necessary, we performed dexamethasone suppression tests at low (2 mg) and high (8 mg) doses, or the loperamide test (16 mg os) for evaluation of glucocorticoid activity and the glucagon test (1 mg i.v.) for exploring adrenal medulla function. Plasma DHEA-S was measured in all patients and the results were compared to those obtained in controls matched for age, sex and menopausal status. Suppression of DHEA-S was found in 11 out of 35 patients (31.5%). However, this hormonal finding occurred in 50% of the extracortical adrenal lesions, while in proven cortical adenomas (no. = 19) it was detected in only 5 patients (26.3%). Sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy and positive predictive value of low DHEA-S in indicating a cortical origin of the mass were 0.27, 0.0, 0.25, and 0.80. In malignancies (no. = 6) low DHEA-S levels were found in 1 out of 2 metastases and never in cortical carcinomas. Sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy and positive predictive value of low DHEA-S in indicating a benign form were 0.34, 0.83, 0.42, and 0.91. Six out of 19 patients with cortical adenomas showed signs of hypothalamic-pituitary adrenal (HPA)-axis dysfunction. Low DHEA-S levels were found in 50% of adenomas with HPA-axis abnormality and in 15.3% of adenomas without hormonal activity. Sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, and positive predictive value of low DHEA-S levels in indicating hormonal activity of the mass were 0.50, 0.84, 0.73, and 0.60. Our data indicate that the association between low DHEA-S levels and adrenal incidentalomas is frequent. Low DHEA-S appears to be a poor predictor of hormonal activity with low sensitivity and specificity in respect of cortical origin and benignity of the mass. In conclusion, our results show that DHEA-S measurement does not offer relevant clinical information in the management of adrenal incidentalomas.

Vitamin C improves endothelium-dependent vasodilation by restoring nitric oxide activity in essential hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Essential hypertension is associated with impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation. Inactivation of endothelium-derived nitric oxide by oxygen free radicals participates in endothelial dysfunction in experimental hypertension. To test this hypothesis in humans, we evaluated the effect of antioxidant vitamin C on endothelium-dependent responses in essential hypertensive patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 14 healthy subjects (47.1+/-4.8 years; blood pressure, 120.6+/-4.5/80.9+/-3.5 mm Hg) and 14 essential hypertensive patients (47.3+/-5.1 years; blood pressure, 153.9+/-7.1/102.3+/-4.1 mm Hg), we studied forearm blood flow (strain-gauge plethysmography) modifications induced by intrabrachial acetylcholine (0.15, 0.45, 1.5, 4.5, and 15 microg x 100 mL(-1) x min(-1)) or sodium nitroprusside (1, 2, and 4 microg/100 mL forearm tissue per minute), an endothelium-dependent and -independent vasodilator, respectively, in basal conditions and during infusion of intrabrachial vitamin C (2.4 mg/100 mL forearm tissue per minute). In hypertensive patients but not in control subjects, vitamin C increased (P<0.01) the impaired vasodilation to acetylcholine, whereas the response to sodium nitroprusside was unaffected. Moreover, in another 14 hypertensive patients (47.1+/-5.2 years; blood pressure, 155.2+/-6.9/103.7+/-4.5 mm Hg), the facilitating effect of vitamin C on vasodilation to acetylcholine was reversed by N(G)-monomethyl-L-arginine (100 microg/100 mL forearm tissue per minute), a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, suggesting that in essential hypertension superoxide anions impair endothelium-dependent vasodilation by nitric oxide breakdown. Finally, because in adjunctive 7 hypertensive patients (47.8+/-6.1 years; blood pressure, 155.3+/-6.8/103.5+/-4.3 mm Hg), indomethacin (50 microg/100 mL forearm tissue per minute), a cyclooxygenase inhibitor, prevented the potentiating effect of vitamin C on vasodilation to acetylcholine, it is possible that in essential hypertension a main source of superoxide anions could be the cyclooxygenase pathway. CONCLUSIONS: In essential hypertensive patients, impaired endothelial vasodilation can be improved by the antioxidant vitamin C, an effect that can be reversed by the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor N(G)-monomethyl-L-arginine. These findings support the hypothesis that nitric oxide inactivation by oxygen free radicals contributes to endothelial dysfunction in essential hypertension.

Lacidipine restores endothelium-dependent vasodilation in essential hypertensive patients.

Essential hypertension is characterized by impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation. The present study was designed to test whether antihypertensive treatment with the calcium antagonist lacidipine can improve endothelium-dependent vasodilation in essential hypertensive patients. In 12 normotensive subjects (mean age, 47.8+/-8.6 years; blood pressure, 118.6+/-4.2/76.7+/-3.9 mm Hg) and 19 hypertensive patients (mean age, 49.4+/-10.2 years; blood pressure; 153.5+/-13.3/101.3+/-6.4 mm Hg), we studied forearm blood flow modifications (strain-gauge plethysmography) induced by intrabrachial infusion of acetylcholine (0.15, 0.45, 1.5, 4.5, and 15 microg/100 mL per minute) and bradykinin (5, 15, and 50 ng/100 mL per minute), two endothelium-dependent vasodilators that act through different receptors and signal transduction pathways, and sodium nitroprusside (1, 2, and 4 microg/100 mL per minute), an endothelium-independent vasodilator. In essential hypertensive patients, vascular reactivity was repeated during prolonged (8 weeks of oral treatment at 6 mg/d) lacidipine administration and 2 weeks after withdrawal of chronic (32-week) treatment. Hypertensive patients showed significantly (P<.01) blunted vasodilation in response to acetylcholine (vascular resistance, 31.5+/-4.9 to 7.6+/-2.4 SU) and bradykinin (vascular resistance, 32.3+/-5.8 to 8.5+/-3.0 SU) compared with control subjects (vascular resistance: acetylcholine, 24.3+/-3.9 to 3.7+/-1.2 SU; bradykinin, 24.7+/-0.4 to 4.1+/-1.3 SU), whereas the response to sodium nitroprusside was similar. After either 8 or 32 weeks of lacidipine treatment, the vasodilation in response to acetylcholine (30.6+/-7.7 to 5.7+/-1.5 and 34.3+/-6.6 to 5.9+/-1.9 SU, respectively) and bradykinin (31.3+/-7.2 to 6.4+/-1.6 and 33.7+/-5.4 to 6.1+/-1.5 SU, respectively), but not to sodium nitroprusside, proved to be significantly (P<.05) increased compared with baseline. In essential hypertensive patients, oral treatment with lacidipine increased forearm vasodilation in response to acetylcholine and bradykinin, suggesting that this drug can improve endothelial function in patients with essential hypertension.

Cyclooxygenase inhibition restores nitric oxide activity in essential hypertension.

To evaluate whether cyclooxygenase constrictor substances can impair nitric oxide-mediated vasodilation in essential hypertension, in seven normotensive subjects (43.3 +/- 4.1 years; BP, 117 +/- 6/81 +/- 2 mm Hg) and seven essential hypertensive patients (47.1 +/- 5.2 years; BP, 151 +/- 8/98 +/- 4 mm Hg) we studied forearm blood flow (strain-gauge plethysmography) modifications induced by intrabrachial acetylcholine (0.15, 0.45, 1.5, 4.5, 15 micrograms.100 mL-1.min-1) in basal conditions, during infusion of NG-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA; 100 micrograms.100 mL-1.min-1), a nitirc oxide synthase inhibitor, or indomethacin (50 micrograms.100 mL-1.min-1), a cyclooxygenase inhibitor, or simultaneous indomethacin and L-NMMA. In normotensives, vasodilation to acetylcholine was blunted by L-NMMA (maximum flow increase: 671 +/- 64% and 386 +/- 42%, respectively; P < .01), and this effect was unchanged by indomethacin. In contrast, in hypertensive patients, vasodilation to acetylcholine (maximum flow increase: 458 +/- 33%) was unchanged by L-NMMA. Indomethacin significantly (P < .01) increased the response to acetylcholine (maximum flow increase: 635 +/- 53%) and restored the inhibitory effect of L-NMMA (maximum flow increase: 445 +/- 36%; P < .01 versus indomethacin alone). In an adjunctive seven normotensives (51.4 +/- 4.2 years; BP, 114 +/- 5/79 +/- 3 mm Hg) and seven essential hypertensives (53.2 +/- 7.6 years; BP, 153 +/- 9/100 +/- 3 mm Hg) we repeated the same protocol by replacing L-NMMA with L-arginine (200 micrograms.100 mL-1.min-1), the substrate for NO synthase. In normotensives, vasodilation to acetylcholine was increased by L-arginine (maximum flow increase: 539 +/- 48% and 806 +/- 61%, respectively) and this effect was unchanged by indomethacin. In hypertensive patients, vasodilation to acetylcholine (maximum flow increase: 339 +/- 32%) was unchanged by L-arginine but was significantly (P < .01) increased by indomethacin (maximum flow increase: 592 +/- 38%). Moreover, indomethacin restored the facilitatory effect of L-arginine (maximum flow increase: 804 +/- 56%; P < .01 versus indomethacin alone). Therefore, cyclooxygenase inhibition restores nitric oxide-mediated vasodilation in essential hypertension, suggesting that cyclooxygenase-dependent substances can impair nitric oxide production.

Hemodynamic and humoral effects of low-dose aspirin in treated and untreated essential hypertensive patients.

Aspirin at low doses is used as an inhibitor of platelet aggregation and is frequently administered to essential hypertensive patients with arterial thrombotic complications. However, it is unknown whether aspirin can modify blood pressure values either in treated or untreated hypertensive patients, as described for other non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Thus 30 patients. 10 with mild uncomplicated and untreated essential hypertension, 10 with essential hypertension under chronic treatment with captopril, 50 mg bid, and 10 with essential hypertension under chronic treatment with atenolol, 100 mg oid, received aspirin, 100 mg oid, and the corresponding placebo for one month, according to a double blind randomized cross-over design. At the end of each treatment, blood pressure, heart rate, generated serum thromboxane B2 and urinary excretion of thromboxane B2 and 6 keto prostaglandin F1 alpha and plasma renin activity were measured. Both in treated and untreated essential hypertensive patients, aspirin administration did not affect blood pressure, heart rate and urinary 6 keto prostaglandin F1 alpha, while it significantly reduced serum and urinary excretion of thromboxane B2 and plasma renin activity. In conclusion, while the present data confirm that low doses of aspirin selectively inhibit thromboxane B2 synthesis, they indicate that aspirin at 100 mg oid can be administered to treated and untreated essential hypertensive patients without any harmful effect on blood pressure values.

The combination of chlorthalidone with nifedipine does not exert an additive antihypertensive effect in essential hypertensives: a crossover multicenter study.

To evaluate whether the combination of nifedipine with chlorthalidone exerts an additive antihypertensive effect when compared to single-drug treatment, 66 uncomplicated essential hypertensives, whose diastolic blood pressure was greater than 100 and less than 115 mm Hg at the end of a 1-month washout placebo period, received, according to a randomized, double-blind, crossover design, nifedipine (20 mg b.i.d.), chlorthalidone (25 mg o.d.), the two drugs combined at the same doses, and the corresponding placebo. When compared to the randomized placebo the three active treatments significantly (p less than 0.001) reduced blood pressure without changing heart rate and body weight. However, blood pressure values were similarly reduced under nifedipine and the combination and were significantly lower (p less than 0.05) than those under chlorthalidone. Moreover, the percentage of responders and normalized patients under nifedipine and the two drugs combined were similar and significantly (normalized, p less than 0.0001; responders, p less than 0.02) greater than those under chlorthalidone. Under chlorthalidone and its combination with nifedipine, plasma potassium tended to decrease and blood glucose and serum uric acid were significantly (p less than 0.05) increased. These data show that the combination of nifedipine with chlorthalidone does not exert any additive antihypertensive effect when compared to nifedipine alone and that this combination increases both blood glucose and serum uric acid. Taken together these findings indicate that the combination of a dihydropyridine calcium antagonist with a thiazide diuretic is devoid of any clinical significance in the treatment of uncomplicated essential hypertensives.

Hemodynamic and humoral interactions between perindopril and indomethacin in essential hypertensive subjects.

To evaluate whether perindopril, a carboxyl-containing new angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, exerts its antihypertensive action through the stimulation of prostaglandin synthesis, 10 uncomplicated essential hypertensive patients randomly received indomethacin (50 mg b.i.d.) or the corresponding placebo for 1 week and the reverse treatment after 2 weeks. Perindopril alone tended to reduce serum and urinary thromboxane B2 (TxB2) and to raise urinary 6-ketoPGF1 alpha and PGE2 and inhibited serum ACE activity 24 h post dosing by about 85%. Indomethacin, which significantly inhibited serum TxB2 and urinary TxB2, 6-ketoPGF1 alpha, and PGE2 without interfering with the inhibitory effect of perindopril on ACE, significantly reduced the antihypertensive action of perindopril alone by about 30%, but decreased though not significantly that of perindopril plus placebo. Although the size of the study limits the interpretation, these findings suggest that the stimulation of prostaglandin synthesis plays only a minor role in the antihypertensive action of perindopril.

Nifedipine interactions in hypertensive patients.

Nifedipine interactions in hypertensive patients have been evaluated, taking into account both the possibility that the inhibition of prostaglandin (PG) synthesis induced by non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can reduce the antihypertensive effect of nifedipine and the interactions of nifedipine with other antihypertensive drugs. While the inhibition of systemic and renal PG synthesis induced by indomethacin reduces the hypertensive effect of many drugs, it does not change the antihypertensive effect of nifedipine. The combination of two antihypertensive drugs with different mechanisms of action is often needed in the treatment of hypertensives, since it is well known that monotherapy is able to normalize BP in no more than 50% of mild to moderate hypertensives, and the rationale to combine two antihypertensive agents is based on the knowledge that their combination exerts an additive antihypertensive effect when compared with single-drug treatment. While it is well established that nifedipine can be usefully combined with beta blockers, ACE inhibitors, and clonidine, it is still controversial whether the combination of nifedipine with a thiazide diuretic exerts an additional antihypertensive effect. We have previously shown that the acute hypotensive effect of nifedipine in patients with chronic renal failure is greater during sodium repletion than during sodium depletion, and that chlorthalidone, compared with placebo, does not increase the hypotensive effect of nifedipine in essential hypertensives.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)