Rationale for the Role of Heparin and Related GAG Antithrombotics in COVID-19 Infection.

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has focused attention on prevention, restriction and treatment methods that are acceptable worldwide. This means that they should be simple and inexpensive. This review examines the possible role of glycosaminoglycan (GAG) antithrombotics in the treatment of COVID-19. The pathophysiology of this disease reveals a complex interplay between the hemostatic and immune systems that can be readily disrupted by SARS-CoV-2. Some of the GAG antithrombotics also possess immune-modulatory actions and since they are relatively inexpensive they could play an important role in the management of COVID-19 and its complications.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). A report of 1,478 clinical outcomes of patients treated with danaparoid (Orgaran) from 1982 to mid-2004.

Clinical outcomes of 1,478 danaparoid treatment case reports for HIT (involving 1,418 patients) treated between 1982 and mid-2004 are analysed. Treatment in 1,291 episodes was for current HIT. Thromboembolism due to HIT was present in 39.4%. The patients include 33 children and 32 pregnancies. Two hundred twenty-six patients required extra-corporeal circuit use for renal failure, 241 patients had a concomitant thrombophilic disorder, and 351 major operations were performed. Clinical outcomes were assessed during danaparoid treatment (range one day to 3.5 years) plus three months of follow-up. Of the danaparoid-treated patients 83.8% survived; 63.7% had no or minor adverse events and 20.1% suffered serious non-fatal adverse events. New thromboses occurred during 9.7% of treatment episodes, and 16.4% of treatment episodes had an inadequate treatment response (i. e. developed one or more of the following: new/extended thrombosis, persistent/new platelet count reduction, unplanned amputation during treatment and follow-up). Major bleeding was reported in 8.1% of treatment episodes. Clinical cross-reactivity of danaparoid (new/persistent platelet count reduction and/or new/extended thrombosis) was confirmed serologically in 23 of 36 patients with positive pretreatment serological danaparoid cross-reactivity and in 22 of 32 additional patients tested at the time of the new event, i.e. a total of 45 patients (3.2%). Clinical outcomes of these case reports of patients given danaparoid because of suspected or confirmed HIT appear to be comparable with those reported by others who used direct thrombin inhibitors, especially when a sufficient danaparoid dosing intensity was used in patients with isolated HIT. Post-operative bleeding limits danaparoid use for cardiopulmonary by-pass surgery. Routine clinical and platelet count monitoring are required to minimise adverse reactions due to cross-reactivity.

Safety and efficacy of danaparoid (Orgaran) use in children.

Immune-mediated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an uncommon but serious complication of therapy with heparins. It affects all ages and requires replacement of the causative anticoagulant. However, information on alternative antithrombotic use in children with HIT is limited. This paper reviews 27 published and 7 unpublished case reports of children aged 2 weeks to 17 years treated with danaparoid. Thirty-three suffered from HIT or suspected HIT, and 1 child without HIT had a high bleeding risk. All children had severe underlying problems increasing their thrombotic and/or bleeding risk. HIT diagnosis was confirmed serologically or clinically in 26 cases (78.8%). Danaparoid regimens were similar to those used in adults, but in general, younger children needed higher daily doses of danaparoid to achieve the same target plasma anti-Xa levels than teenagers or adults. Of those with a known outcome 28/33 children (84.8%) survived, 7 having suffered from a serious adverse event. Five deaths occurred including 1 thrombotic and 2 major bleeds. Three of the in total 4 major bleeding events occurred in children undergoing surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. We conclude that despite the reported adverse events danaparoid can be used as an alternative antithrombotic for children who are intolerant of the heparins, except in cases requiring cardiopulmonary bypass surgery.

Results of a systematic evaluation of treatment outcomes for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients receiving danaparoid, ancrod, and/or coumarin explain the rapid shift in clinical practice during the 1990s.

INTRODUCTION: Randomized controlled trials evaluating treatment of acute, transient, but uncommon diseases are difficult to perform. The prothrombotic adverse drug reaction, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), is such an example. During the mid-1980s, the defibrinogenating snake venom, ancrod (+/-warfarin, Canada), or coumarin (warfarin, Canada; phenprocoumon, Germany) alone, were often used to treat HIT. During the 1990s, danaparoid+/-coumarin began to replace ancrod (+/-coumarin), or coumarin alone, for treating HIT, despite danaparoid not being approved for treatment of HIT. METHODS: We performed a retrospective evaluation of treatment outcomes from 1986 to 1999, comparing danaparoid+/-coumarin (n=62) versus ancrod+/-coumarin or coumarin alone (controls, n=56). RESULTS: The predefined composite endpoint of adjudicated new, progressive, or recurrent thrombosis (including thrombotic death), or limb amputation, at day 7 (maximum, one event per patient) was significantly lower in danaparoid-treated patients, compared with controls: 8/62=12.9% (95% CI, 4.3-21.5) vs. 22/56=39.3% (95% CI, 26.1-52.5); p=0.0014. We also found a lower frequency of the composite endpoint at end of study (day 35) in danaparoid-treated patients: 12/62=19.4% vs. 24/56=42.9% (p=0.0088). Major bleeding (by day 7) occurred in 7/62 (11.3%) and 16/56 (28.6%) of danaparoid-treated and control patients, respectively (p=0.0211). CONCLUSIONS: The replacement of ancrod+/-coumarin, or coumarin alone, by danaparoid (+/-coumarin) in the mid-1990s for the treatment of HIT was justified by improved efficacy and safety.

Treatment of 51 pregnancies with danaparoid because of heparin intolerance.

Pregnant patients with acute venous thrombosis or a history of thrombosis may need alternative anticoagulation, when heparin intolerance occurs. Only limited data on the use of the heparinoid danaparoid are available in literature. We reviewed the use of danaparoid in 51 pregnancies of 49 patients identified in literature between 1981 and 2004. All patients had developed heparin intolerance (32 due to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, 19 mainly due to heparin-induced skin rashes) and had a current and/or past history of thromboembolic complications. The initial danaparoid dose regimens ranged from 1000 to 7500 U/day administered s.c. or i.v.. The median duration of danaparoid use was 10 weeks. Danaparoid was used until delivery of a healthy infant in 37 pregnancies. In the remaining 14 pregnancies it was stopped earlier, because anticoagulant treatment was no longer required (3/14) or an adverse event led to a treatment discontinuation (11/14). Four maternal bleeding events were recorded during pregnancy, delivery or postpartum, two of them were fatal due to placental problems. Three fetal deaths were recorded, all associated with maternal complications antedating danaparoid use. Danaparoid cross-reactivity was suspected in 4 HIT patients and 5 non-HIT patients with skin reactions and was confirmed serologically in one of the two HIT patients tested. In none of five fetal cord blood- and three maternal breast milksamples anti-Xa activity transfer was observed. In conclusion danaparoid can be used as an alternative antithrombotic agent in pregnant women with high thrombotic risk and intolerance to heparins.