Malpractice claims in interventional radiology: frequency, characteristics and protective measures.

PURPOSE: The use of interventional radiology procedures has considerably increased in recent years, as has the number of related medicolegal litigations. This study aimed to highlight the problems underlying malpractice claims in interventional radiology and to assess the importance of the informed consent process. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors examined all insurance claims relating to presumed errors in interventional radiology filed by radiologists over a period of 14 years after isolating them from the insurance database of all radiologists registered with the Italian Society of Medical Radiology (SIRM) between 1 January1993 and 31 December 2006. RESULTS: In the period considered, 98 malpractice claims were filed against radiologists who had performed interventional radiology procedures. In 21 cases (21.4%), the event had caused the patient's death. In >80% of cases, the event occurred in a public facility. The risk of a malpractice claim for a radiologist practising interventional procedures is 47 per 1,000, which corresponds to one malpractice claim for each 231 years of activity. DISCUSSION: Interventional radiology, a discipline with a biological risk profile similar to that of surgery, exposes practitioners to a high risk of medicolegal litigation both because of problems intrinsic to the techniques used and because of the need to operate on severely ill patients with compromised clinical status. CONCLUSIONS: Litigation prevention largely depends on both reducing the rate of medical error and providing the patient with correct and coherent information. Adopting good radiological practices, scrupulous review of procedures and efficiency of the instruments used and audit of organisational and management processes are all factors that can help reduce the likelihood of error. Improving communication techniques while safeguarding the patient's right to autonomy also implies adopting clear and rigorous processes for obtaining the patient's informed consent to the medical procedure.

Violence against radiologists. I: Prevalence and preventive measures.

PURPOSE: Violence in the workplace is a specific risk for healthcare workers. Radiologists, especially when involved in emergency services, share that risk. Very few studies in the literature have researched this topic. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of violent behaviour in a large sample of Italian radiologists and analyse the phenomenon and its consequences with a view to proposing preventive measures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 992 radiologists (61.5% men) taking part in a national radiology congress agreed to respond to a questionnaire on violence that contained the Violent Incident Form by Arnetz for the description of violent incidents in healthcare practice. RESULTS: Some 6.8% of radiologists in public hospitals experienced physical abuse in the previous 12 months, for the most part from patients or their companions. The prevalence of physical abuse is greatest among younger healthcare individuals with less clinical experience, with no differences between sexes. Among younger radiologists, one in five suffered at least one act of physical abuse in a working year. Nonphysical violence is more widespread and throughout radiologists' working lives affects 65.2% of them. In this case, almost half of the violent incidents originate from colleagues. A total of 5.5% of respondents stated that they were victims of abuse at the time of the survey. In most cases, the violent incidents remain unreported. The immediate consequences of violence in the workplace are emotions such as anger, disappointment, humiliation, anxiety, fear, distress, a feeling of helplessness and isolation, occasionally a feeling of guilt or of having done wrong and a desire to take revenge, change behaviour or change workplace. CONCLUSIONS: The extent of the problem calls for the adoption of a series of measures aimed at eliminating the causes of the various forms of workplace violence.

[Influence of environmental discomfort on musculoskeletal disorders]. / Influenza dei fattori ambientali sui disturbi muscoloscheletrici.

Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) are common among hospital workers. This cross-sectional study on 1744 hospital workers showed strong interaction between temperature complaints (OR 2.73), other environmental complaints (OR 3.12) and upper limbs disorders. A significant interaction between temperature and strain for upper limbs disorders (F = 9.52, p = 0.023) was also found. Environmental and psychosocial factors can interact increasing significantly the risk of MSDs.

The impaired radiologist.

The concept of the "impaired physician" is an oxymoron. Physicians are by definition bearers of health, which can lead to overlooking the possibility of them contracting an illness that reduces their diagnostic and therapeutic abilities, with a consequent danger to their patients' health. The clinical reasons for which a radiologist may constitute a danger to patients can be divided into two categories: infectious blood-borne diseases, which can be transmitted to the patient during interventional radiology procedures; and neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders, including alcohol and drug abuse, which temporarily or permanently impair the faculty of judgement. All radiologists have a duty to periodically verify their own state of health and seek help as soon as possible when they fear it may be a danger. This individual responsibility towards one's own patients is flanked by the health and safety requirements provided by European regulations for radiologists who are employers, directors or department heads. The occupational health physician plays a key role in identifying and managing the impaired radiologist.

Ethical problems in radiology: medical error and disclosure.

In radiological practice, as in any medical activity, errors are inevitable despite being foreseeable and preventable. The approach to managing medical error and relations with patients prompt the need for resolving the ethical dilemma arising from conflicting legitimate interests. The solution to this dilemma is particularly complex in an environment in which the tendency to sue physicians for civil liability or incriminate them for criminal liability appears to be particularly high. The disclosure of error is undeniably useful in raising patient awareness, reducing their suffering, improving the quality of care and limiting the consequences of the damage. There does not appear to be any evidence to suggest disclosure modifies the probability of litigation against the physician.

Work stress in radiologists. A pilot study.

PURPOSE: We studied occupational stress and its psychosocial effects in a sample of Italian radiologists and radiotherapists: MATERIALS AND METHODS: Radiologists and radiotherapists attending two medical conferences were invited to complete a questionnaire comprising four sections investigating the risk of occupational stress (organisational discomfort, Karasek's Job Content Questionnaire, Siegrist's Effort-Reward Imbalance, Warr's Job Satisfaction) and four sections investigating the health effects of such stress (Goldberg's Anxiety and Depression Scales, General Health Questionnaire, Lifestyles Questionnaire). RESULTS: Radiologists and radiotherapists generally expressed high levels of control, reward and satisfaction. However, 38.5% complained of severe organisational discomfort, 24% reported job strain, 28% reported effort/reward imbalance and 25% were dissatisfied. Female radiologists and radiotherapists showed higher levels of organisational discomfort than their male colleagues. Younger and less experienced radiologists and radiotherapists had higher strain scores than their older and more experienced colleagues. A significant correlation was observed between stress predictors and the effects of stress on health, including depression and anxiety, psychological distress and unhealthy lifestyles. CONCLUSIONS: Radiologists and radiotherapists are exposed to major occupational stress factors, and a significant percentage of them suffer from workplace stress. A special effort is required to prevent this condition.

Malpractice stress syndrome in radiologists and radiotherapists: perceived causes and consequences.

PURPOSE: Radiology is among the specialties with an increasing risk of litigation. Regardless of the outcome of legal proceedings, physicians who are sued usually perceive the claim as an assault on their integrity and may suffer psychological or physical effects known as "malpractice stress syndrome". MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred and six radiologists and 108 radiotherapists responded to a questionnaire containing specific items concerning their perception of malpractice stress and their opinions about the causes of clinical errors, as well as an assessment of work satisfaction and general health. RESULTS: One third of physicians had been sued for malpractice. Age was significantly related to the occurrence of malpractice litigation. Radiological errors were purportedly related to occupational discomfort, and the latter variable was significantly associated with work dissatisfaction and a low level of psychological and physical well-being. CONCLUSIONS: Radiologists are well acquainted with medical malpractice and its causes; however, they have limited familiarity with clinical risk management practices and often ignore procedures of informed consent. A targeted educational effort is required to overcome these shortcomings.

[The physician with a reduced work ability]. / Il medico con limitazione della capacità lavorativa.

The occupational health physician charged of medical surveillance of hospital workers is often mandated to manage impaired physicians. Some "red flags" may be observed during medical surveillance of workers, and this should elicit the suspect that the colleague is impaired by chemical, psychiatric, or neurological disease. Three emblematic cases are discussed. While English-speaking countries have faced the problem since the 70's, Italy currently lacks policy to deal with impaired physicians.

[Stalking in work environment]. / Stalking in ambito lavorativo.

Stalking is a form of interpersonal victimization that can have irrevocable effects on the lives of victims but is frequently misunderstood and minimized. This article presents a case study of a woman who was stalked in the workplace by a 39-year-old male colleague, and offers recommendations for occupational health clinicians charged of medical surveillance of workers (so-called "Competent Physicians") who have to cope with stalking at the workplace. The prevalence of stalking provides many opportunities for Competent Physicians to intervene, but first they must recognize and understand the problem. The study underlines the inadequacy of the current legal and medical responses to the needs of these victims.

[Workers risky for others on the Web]. / Lavoratori rischiosi per gli altri sul Web.

Hazardous workers (HWs) are they who, depending upon their pathologic conditions, ageing or addictive behaviour, may pose at risk the safety and health of their colleagues, customers, and other people. Physicians charged of the medical surveillance of workers (Competent Physicians, CPs) are called to assess fitting for work of HWs. The aim of this paper was to analyze the frequency of debate about HWs in the online forums of the Italian CPs' website. Results show that there is growing attention on the HWs issue. Different stakeholders are involved, and some ethic dilemma are posed. A systematic approach to the problem, and the formulation of guidelines for CPs, is highly desirable.

[Identification and control of workers that pose a risk to others in the health field]. / Identificazione e controllo dei lavoratori rischiosi per gli altri nelle attività sanitarie.

BACKGROUND: Working in health care increases the probability that an impaired worker be hazardous for third persons. METHODS: A literature review concerning identification, intervention, and treatment of hazardous health care workers is here reported. RESULTS: Published reports of health care worker-to-patient transmission of bloodborne infections, and papers concerning the so-called "impaired physician", have been reviewed. DISCUSSION: According to European directives on workers' health and safety, the occupational health physician charged of medical surveillance of hospital workers is often mandated to manage impaired professionals. CONCLUSIONS: Strategies for early identification, treatment and rehabilitation of impaired physicians are reviewed and suggestions for preventive action are given.

Tratamento de uretrite gonocócica por norfloxacin / Treatment of gonoccocal urethritis by norfloxacin

Norfloxacin, quinolônico utilizado por via oral, relacionado ao ácido nalidíxico, tem atividade "in vitro" contra N. gonorrhoaea. Trinta homens com uretrite gonocócica resistente à penicilina, foram dividios em dois grupos e tratados com 1200mg de Norfloxacin (divididos em duas aplicaçöes, a primeira de 800mg, seguida 4 horas após de 400mg) e outro grupo recebendo 800mg do produto em dose única. Todos os pacientes tratados com 1200mg do produto foram curados. Na dose única de 800mg, houve 1 caso näo curado de uretrite. A eficácia do produto nos dois grupos, portanto foi excelente. Deste modo, acreditamos que o Norfloxacin pode ser utilizado para o tratamento de uretrite gonocócica, e provavelmente seu uso deva ser cada vez mais indicado nos casos com elevada prevalência de N. gonorrhoaea resistente à penicilina