The pharmacokinetics and neuromuscular effects of rocuronium bromide in patients with liver disease.

To determine the effect of liver disease on the pharmacokinetics of rocuronium, the authors administered 0.6 mg/kg (twice the ED95) to 10 patients with liver disease and compared these results to values in 10 healthy surgical patients. Anesthesia was induced with thiopental and maintained with isoflurane (0.9%-1.1% end-tidal concentration) and nitrous oxide (60%). Venous blood samples were obtained for 6 h after rocuronium injection and plasma concentrations were measured using gas chromatography. Pharmacokinetic differences between groups were determined using a population-based pharmacokinetic analysis (NONMEM). Hepatic impairment did not alter the plasma clearance of rocuronium (217 +/- 21.8 mL/min, mean +/- SE, for both groups), but did increase the volume of the central compartment (5.96 +/- 1.01 L for controls, 7.87 +/- 1.33 L for patients with liver disease) and volume of distribution at steady state (16.4 L for controls, 23.4 L for patients with liver disease). In turn, elimination half-life was longer in patients with liver disease (111 min) compared to controls (75.4 min). The authors conclude that liver disease alters the pharmacokinetics of rocuronium by increasing its volume of distribution. The longer elimination half-life might result in a longer duration of action of rocuronium in patients with liver disease, particularly after prolonged administration.

Comparison of rocuronium, succinylcholine, and vecuronium for rapid-sequence induction of anesthesia in adult patients.

BACKGROUND: Succinylcholine has been the agent of choice when clinical conditions require emergency airway protection during a rapid-sequence induction of anesthesia. Rocuronium, a new nondepolarizing muscle relaxant with a brief onset of action, but devoid of the adverse reactions associated with succinylcholine, may be an alternative to succinylcholine. To test this hypothesis, the authors compared rocuronium with succinylcholine and vecuronium for rapid-sequence induction of anesthesia. METHODS: Fifty patients, ASA 1-3, were randomly designated to receive one of three intravenous doses of rocuronium (0.6, 0.9, and 1.2 mg/kg), vecuronium (0.1 mg/kg), or succinylcholine (1.0 mg/kg). Patients were premedicated with midazolam and fentanyl, and received 2-7 mg/kg thiopental for induction of anesthesia. Sixty seconds after receiving a muscle relaxant, intubation of the trachea was attempted by a clinician who was blinded to the muscle relaxant administered. Neuromuscular monitoring was established before administration of the muscle relaxant. The time from injection of muscle relaxant until complete ablation of T1 (onset) and recovery of T1 to 25% (duration) were recorded. Tracheal intubating conditions were evaluated, and the presence or absence of fasciculations was noted. RESULTS: Onset times for patients receiving 0.9 mg/kg (75 +/- 28 s) and 1.2 mg/kg rocuronium (55 +/- 14 s), and succinylcholine (50 +/- 17 s) were similar. Onset times for the groups given 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium (89 +/- 33 s) and vecuronium (144 +/- 39 s) were significantly longer. Clinical duration of action was longest with 1.2 mg/kg rocuronium, similar with 0.6 and 0.9 mg/kg rocuronium, and vecuronium, and least with succinylcholine. CONCLUSIONS: There is a dose-dependent decrease in onset time with rocuronium. The onset times for the two larger doses of rocuronium were similar to that for succinylcholine, but clinical duration of action with rocuronium was significantly longer. The brief onset time achieved with rocuronium indicates that administration of 0.9-1.2 mg/kg is an acceptable alternative to succinylcholine for rapid-sequence induction of anesthesia.

The neuromuscular effects of desflurane, alone and combined with pancuronium or succinylcholine in humans.

The neuromuscular effects of desflurane administered alone were studied in ten healthy human volunteers aged 20-27 yr. Also, the dose-response relationships of pancuronium and succinylcholine in surgical patients during anesthesia with desflurane (n = 13) were compared to those during isoflurane anesthesia (n = 14). In the volunteers, we measured the mechanical response of the adductor pollicis muscle to stimulation of the ulnar nerve in a train-of-four (TOF) sequence at 2 Hz and at tetanic frequencies of 50, 100, and 200 Hz, each administered for 5 s. Amplitudes of the first response (T1) in each TOF sequence and the ratios of the fourth TOF response (T4) to the first were similar at 3, 6, and 9% desflurane and decreased significantly only at 12% (P less than 0.05). Desflurane concentrations of 3-12% caused tetanic fade (greater than 10% decrement in amplitude) at 50, 100, and 200 Hz. The addition of N2O and the duration of anesthetic exposure did not alter desflurane's neuromuscular effects. The only neuromuscular variable influenced by CO2 was T1 amplitude, which decreased as arterial CO2 tension (PaCO2) increased. The doses of pancuronium that depressed T1 amplitude by 50% (ED50) were similar during anesthesia with 1.25 MAC desflurane, 10.5 +/- 2.8 micrograms/kg (mean +/- SD) and 1.25 MAC isoflurane, 12.3 +/- 5.0 micrograms/kg. The ED50 doses of succinylcholine were similar during anesthesia with desflurane 132 +/- 76 micrograms/kg and isoflurane 123 +/- 36 micrograms/kg. We conclude that desflurane significantly depresses neuromuscular function and augments the action of pancuronium and succinylcholine to a degree similar to that of isoflurane.

Can early administration of neostigmine, in single or repeated doses, alter the course of neuromuscular recovery from a vecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade?

The authors sought to determine whether neostigmine, given at a time when no response to peripheral nerve stimulation could be elicited, hastened recovery from a vecuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade (NMB). The effect of neostigmine (70 micrograms/kg) in antagonizing a profound (no-twitch) vecuronium-induced (0.1 mg/kg) NMB in 40 healthy patients was studied. Patients were randomly assigned to one of four groups specifying the sequence of neostigmine administration. Fifteen minutes after the administration of vecuronium, when there was no detectable twitch response, each patient received either neostigmine (70 micrograms/kg) with glycopyrrolate (15 micrograms/kg) or an equivalent volume of normal saline (placebo). When T1 (the first response in the train-of-four [TOF] sequence) recovered to 10% of control, patients again received either neostigmine with glycopyrrolate in the same doses as before or the placebo. The following variables were measured: times from vecuronium injection until T1 recovered to 10% (t [10]) and 90% (t [90]) of control, and time until the TOF ratio was equal to 75% (t [TOF75]). Mean values of t (90) and t (TOF75) were shorter (54.7-75.2 min and 60.4-79.5 min, respectively) for the three groups who received neostigmine as compared with patients who received two doses of placebo (104.3 and 122.6 min, respectively). There were no differences in the t (90) and t (TOF75) values among the three groups who received neostigmine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)