Application of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Patients Undergoing Kidney Transplant: the Belfast Protocol.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the Belfast Protocol for enhanced recovery after surgery on hospital length of stay (LOS) after kidney transplant. METHODS: A prospectively collected database was analyzed for all consecutive renal transplant recipients in 2010 and compared with consecutive renal transplant recipients in 2018 before and immediately after the full implementation of the Belfast Protocol. RESULTS: There were 73 renal transplants in 2010 and 115 in 2018. Between 2010 and 2018 there was a significant decrease in LOS from 12 to 7 days (P < .0001). Compared with 2010, in 2018 there was a significant increase in donor age (47 vs 54 years, P < .0001) and kidney transplant from donation after circulatory death donors (0% vs 9%, P < .0001). Although there was no change in the proportion of living donors (59% vs 50%, P = .32), in 2018 there were more blood group incompatible living donors (0% vs 7%, P = .21). Compared with 2010, in 2018 there was a significant increase in recipient age (43 vs 54 years, P = .0002), diabetic nephropathy (5% vs 16%, P = .03), and recipient body mass index >35 kg/m2 (0% vs 9%, P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the Belfast Protocol has decreased LOS in renal transplant recipients despite increasingly complex donor and recipient profiles.

The arteriovenous access stage (AVAS) classification.

BACKGROUND: Key anatomical factors mean that individuals needing arteriovenous access are unique and have different possibilities for fistula creation. The aim of this article is to describe a new classification system for all patients needing haemodialysis vascular access in the upper extremity with the purpose to simplify sharing the information about suitability for surgical access creation depending on vascular anatomy. METHODS: According to the patient's vascular anatomy in right and left superior extremities, patients were separated into three arteriovenous access stages (AVAS). The AVAS was validated by three blinded observers using a sample of 70 upper limb arteriovenous maps that were performed using ultrasound on patients referred for vascular access assessment. A sample size calculation was performed and calculated that for three observers, a minimum of 67 maps were required to confirm significant agreement at a Kappa value of 0.9 (95% confidence interval 0.75-0.99). RESULTS: The Kappa value for inter-rater reliability using Fleiss' Kappa coefficient was 0.94 and all patients fitted into the AVAS classification system. CONCLUSION: The AVAS classification system is a simplified way to share information about vascular access options based on a patient's vascular anatomy with high inter-rater reliability.

Splenic injury after colonoscopy requiring splenectomy.

We present a case of a middle-aged woman, who presented with abdominal pain less than 24 h following an uneventful colonoscopy for rectal bleeding. Initial diagnosis was thought to be colonic perforation. An urgent CT scan performed owing to dropping haemoglobin and blood pressure revealed a large perisplenic haematoma. An urgent laparotomy was performed in which the patient had a total blood loss of 2500 ml and required splenectomy. The patient recovered well postoperatively.Colonoscopy is a commonly performed procedure in which complications of perforation and bleeding are well recognised. This case represents one of the rare but serious complications that endoscopists and patients should be aware of to aid prevention and early diagnosis.