Vascular access hemorrhages contribute to deaths among hemodialysis patients.

In 2007 the Maryland Medical Examiner noted a potential cluster of fatal vascular access hemorrhages among hemodialysis patients, many of whom died outside of a health-care setting. To examine the epidemiology of fatal vascular access hemorrhages, we conducted a retrospective case review in District of Columbia, Maryland, and Virginia from January 2000 to July 2007 and a case-control study. Records from the Medical Examiner and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services were reviewed, from which 88 patients were identified as fatal vascular access hemorrhage cases. To assess risk factors, a subset of 20 cases from Maryland was compared to 38 controls randomly selected among hemodialysis patients who died from non-vascular access hemorrhage causes at the same Maryland facilities. Of the 88 confirmed cases, 55% hemorrhaged from arteriovenous grafts, 24% from arteriovenous fistulas, and 21% from central venous catheters. Of 82 case-patients with known location of hemorrhage, 78% occurred at home or in a nursing home. In the case-control analysis, statistically significant risk factors included the presence of an arteriovenous graft, access-related complications within 6 months of death, and hypertension; presence of a central venous catheter was significantly protective. Psychosocial factors and anticoagulant medications were not significant risk factors. Effective strategies to control vascular access hemorrhage in the home and further delineation of warning signs are needed.

Outbreak of lower respiratory tract illness associated with human enterovirus 68 among American Indian children.

Human enterovirus 68 (EV68) infections are rarely reported. We describe a respiratory outbreak associated with EV68 among 18 children admitted to a remote Indian Health Service facility during August 11, 2010 through September 14, 2010. Clinical illness was characterized by pneumonia and wheezing. EV68 should be considered as an etiology in outbreaks of lower respiratory tract illness.

Association between swimming pool operator certification and reduced pool chemistry violations--Nebraska, 2005-2006.

Previous studies have recommended mandatory education for all public pool operators, but substantiating data are limited. This study evaluates associations between pool operator certification and chemistry violations by using 2005-2006 Nebraska routine pool inspection reports. Training and certification for nonmunicipal pool operators are only required in two Nebraska counties. Free chlorine violations for nonmunicipal pool inspections were compared in counties with and without certified operator requirements. To control for water supply pH, inspections from nonmunicipal pools with shared-source water in two counties (one requiring certification) were compared for concurrent pH and free chlorine violations. Compared with locations that require certified operators, free chlorine violations and concurrent pH and free chlorine violations were twice as likely in locations without certification. As a result, pools without required operator certification might pose greater health risks. These results demonstrate the benefit of requiring pool operator certification to help prevent recreational water illnesses.

Lyme disease knowledge, beliefs, and practices of New Hampshire primary care physicians.

BACKGROUND: Lyme disease is the most commonly reported vectorborne illness in the United States and is endemic in many counties in the Northeast, including counties in New Hampshire. Previous studies conducted elsewhere on Lyme disease have indicated substantial differences between physician practices and published consensus guidelines for diagnosis and treatment. METHODS: During 1999, we mailed a 21-item questionnaire to 600 randomly selected family practice physicians, internists, and pediatricians in New Hampshire. RESULTS: Respondents answered a median of 10 (76.9%) of 13 knowledge items correctly. Most physicians (73.6%) underestimated the incidence of erythema migrans among Lyme disease patients, and 41.2% would either test or offer treatment to an asymptomatic patient with deer-tick bite. When surveyed, most respondents (72.4%) planned to recommend Lyme disease vaccine to high-risk persons. Approximately one half (44.8%) reported giving empiric antibiotic treatment of Lyme disease solely because of patient concern. CONCLUSIONS: New Hampshire primary care physicians indicated good knowledge about Lyme disease. Lack of awareness about Lyme disease diagnostic criteria, however, could contribute to misdiagnosis through overreliance on laboratory testing. Lyme disease vaccine appeared to be well accepted by physicians, although the vaccine has since been withdrawn from the US market. Both inappropriate management of tick bite and empiric treatment of unsubstantiated Lyme disease diagnoses were common.