Efficacy of Super-Bioavailable Itraconazole and Conventional Itraconazole at Different Dosing Regimens in Glabrous Tinea Infection - A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Introduction: Itraconazole follows non-linear pharmacokinetics and hence is recommended once daily, but in real-world practice, is commonly prescribed as twice daily. Hence, this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of super-bioavailable-itraconazole-130 mg (SB-130) and conventional-itraconazole-200 mg (CITZ-200) once daily compared with conventional-itraconazole-100 mg (CITZ-100) twice daily in glabrous tinea. Methods: A total of 261 eligible patients were enrolled in this prospective, randomized, clinical study from December-2021 to August-2022 at seven centers in India. Efficacy and safety assessments were done at week-3 and 6, with follow-up at week-10 for relapse. The primary objective was to assess the proportion of patients who achieved complete cure at week-6 following treatment in all itraconazole groups. The secondary outcomes were safety and clinical and mycological cure rates. Results: Of 261 patients, 240 were included in the analysis. At week-6, 140 patients were completely cured; thus, overall cure rate was 58.33%. Fifty-five patients (69%) in SB-130 while 47/77 (61%) and 38/83 (46%) patients were completely cured in CITZ-200 and CITZ-100 groups respectively (p<0.05; SB-130: CITZ-100, p=0.32; SB-130: CITZ-200, p=0.058; CITZ-200: CITZ-100). There was no statistical difference in the mycological cure rate and area clearance rate between any of the groups (p=0.14); however, a statistically significant difference was noted for OD dosing over BD dosing in achieving clinical cure rates (p<0.05). A total of 13/140 patients (9%) relapsed following complete cure, with no statistically significant difference between any of the groups (p=0.50). All treatments were safe and well-tolerated, with no discontinuation. Conclusion: In this clinical study, moderate efficacy with all doses of ITZ was reported but was better with OD dosing. Although there was no statistical difference between SB-130 and CITZ-200, SB-130 may be preferred over CITZ-200 owing to the advantage of SB over the conventional ITZ.

Comparative Efficacy of Super Bioavailable Itraconazole Capsules 50 mg vs 65 mg Twice Daily in the Management of Glabrous Tinea.

Introduction: Owing to pharmacokinetic challenges of itraconazole, super-bioavailable itraconazole (SB) was developed and recently approved in strengths of 50mg and 65mg. But comparative study was lacking between these two strengths in glabrous tinea (dermatophytosis) management. Hence, this study was planned to compare the efficacy of both these strengths in dermatophytosis. Methods: One hundred eligible patients were enrolled in this prospective, randomized, clinical study during May-2022 to September-2022 at tertiary hospital in Ahmedabad in adults. Efficacy and safety assessments were done at week-3 and 6 with follow up at week-10 for relapse. Primary objective was to assess the proportion of patients achieving complete cure at week-6 following treatment in both the groups. Secondary outcomes compared safety, clinical and mycological cure rates. Results: Of the 100 patients enrolled, 98 patients (50 in SB-50mg and 48 in SB-65mg group) included in the final analysis. At week 6, 20 patients (40%) and 30 patients (62.5%) achieved complete cure (p < 0.05) in SB-50mg and SB-65mg groups, respectively. In completely cured patients, relapse was reported in 3 (15%) and 5 (17%) patients of SB-50mg and SB-65mg groups, respectively (p = 1). A significant difference was noted in clearance of symptoms and lesions in SB-65mg group (p < 0.05). Moreover, similar results were also obtained in sub-group analysis of recalcitrant dermatophytosis. Both the treatments were found to be safe and well tolerated with no discontinuation. Conclusion: Study result concluded the superiority of SB-65mg over SB-50mg in terms of cure rate and resolution of symptoms in dermatophytosis management.

The Optimal Dosing Regimen of Super Bioavailable Itraconazole in Obesity: An Experimental Rat Model Study.

Background Obesity may alter tissue distribution and clearance of several drugs, especially lipophilic ones. Itraconazole, a lipophilic drug, has been recently introduced in a super-bioavailable formulation (SB-ITZ) for the treatment of dermatophytosis. Evidence regarding optimal dosing of SB-ITZ in obesity is lacking. A current experimental study was planned to analyze tissue concentrations of SB-ITZ at different doses in obese and non-obese rats.  Materials and methods Thirty-six Wistar albino rats of either sex were divided into obese and non-obese rats equally. Further, rats in both categories were divided into three dosing groups. Group 1 received SB-ITZ 13 mg once daily in the morning, group 2 received SB-ITZ 13 mg in the morning and 6.5 mg in the evening, while Group 3 rats received SB-ITZ 13 mg twice daily, orally. Concentrations of SB-ITZ in the skin, serum, and fatty tissue were assessed in each group on days 7, 14, 21, and 28. Comparison of SB-ITZ concentrations in various tissues in obese and non-obese rats and inter-group comparison of tissue concentrations across the three dosing regimens was done at day 28 and expressed as Mean ± SD.36 Wistar rats were divided into obese and non-obese rats equally. Results At day 28, skin concentrations of SB-ITZ were 5.36±1.1, 8.9±1.7 and 10.13±1.7 µg/g in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively, in non-obese rats, which was statistically significant (p<0.05) than skin concentration of obese rats (2.72±0.6, 4.2±0.7 and 4.66±0.5 µg/g) for the corresponding dosing groups respectively. Skin concentration of SB-ITZ was statistically significant for Groups 2 and 3 as compared to Group 1. Still, no statistically significant difference was noted between Groups 2 and 3 in non-obese and obese rats. Fatty tissue concentration of SB-ITZ was comparable in all 3 dosing regimens in non-obese and obese rats. But on the intergroup comparison, a statistically significant difference was observed for Groups 2 and 3 against Group 1 (p<0.05). Increasing the dose of SB-ITZ increased serum concentration. In non-obese rats, a statistically significant difference was noted between Group 2 (74.33±6.6 ng/ml) and Group 1 (52.5±9.9 ng/ml); p<0.01 and also in Group 3 (81.33±6.8 ng/ml) against Group 1; p<0.01. Group 3 achieved significantly higher concentration than the other two groups in obese rats (Group 3; 72±5.3, Group 2; 60.5±4.3, and Group 1; 45±7 ng/ml; p<0.01). Conclusion Overall, skin, fatty tissue, and serum concentrations of SB-ITZ were higher in non-obese rats compared to obese rats in all three dosing groups. Moreover, skin and fatty tissue concentrations were proportionately higher than serum in all the groups in non-obese and obese rats. Though the skin concentration of non-obese rats was significantly higher than obese rats, skin concentration in obese rats was within the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) range, demonstrating the efficacy of all dosing regimens.

Pharmacokinetic and clinical comparison of super-bioavailable itraconazole and conventional itraconazole at different dosing in dermatophytosis.

Background: Due to changing face of dermatophytosis in India, many dermatologists practice different dosing patterns of itraconazole (ITZ). Recently, a new form of ITZ, super-bioavailable ITZ (SBITZ), has been commercialized to overcome the pharmacokinetic challenges of conventional ITZ (CITZ). Serum and sebum concentration of ITZ plays an important role in the management of dermatophytosis. Hence, the current study compares the rate and extent of serum and sebum concentration of SBITZ and CITZ at different dosing to determine their efficacy and safety in patients with dermatophytosis. Methods: This was an open-label, randomized, four-arm study including 40 adult patients diagnosed with glabrous tinea who were randomized equally into four groups to receive either CITZ-100-BD or CITZ-200-OD (2×100 mg capsules) or SBITZ-130-OD or SBITZ-100-OD (2×SBITZ-50 mg capsules) for 4 weeks. Serum and sebum samples were analysed at different time intervals along with clinical efficacy and safety. Results: For serum concentration, on day 28, the arithmetic mean and standard deviation (SD) for CITZ-100-BD, CITZ-200-OD, SB-130-OD and SB100-OD were 1262±233.5 ng/mL, 1704±261.6 ng/mL, 1770±268.9 ng/mL and 1520±231.7 ng/mL, respectively, which was statistically significant for OD dosing of ITZ/SBITZ over CITZ-100-BD. Similarly, for sebum concentration, the arithmetic mean and SD for CITZ-100-BD, CITZ-200-OD, SB-130-OD and SB-100-OD were 1042±163.45 ng/mg, 1423±192.46 ng/mg, 1534±227.55 ng/mg and 1107±182.35 ng/mg, respectively, which was statistically significant for SB-130-OD and CITZ-200-OD over CITZ-100-BD and SBITZ-100-OD dosing. No significant difference was noted between SBITZ-130 and CITZ-200 (p=0.25). Only two patients achieved complete cure in the SBITZ-130 group, whereas no patients achieved the same in other groups (p=0.47). All the dosages were very well tolerated with only 12 adverse events reported by ten patients in all groups. Conclusion: All formulations achieved desired serum and sebum concentrations required for efficacy in dermatophytosis, but SB 130 mg OD and CITZ 200 mg OD were statistically significant than other ITZ doses in achieving sebum concentration. Additionally, SBITZ 130 mg OD was bioequivalent to CITZ 200 mg OD and achieved similar results to those of CITZ 200 mg OD but at 35% lower drug concentrations.

Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Apremilast in the Management of Lichen Planus.

Introduction: Lichen planus is a chronic disease with often disappointing and less than optimal treatment options. Apremilast modulates inflammatory signalling pathways which play a central role in the pathogenesis of lichen planus, thus making it useful in the management of such patients. Materials and Methods: The present study was an investigator-initiated, single-centre, non-randomized, open-label, pilot study of the efficacy and safety of Apremilast in the treatment of lichen planus. All the patients were prescribed Apremilast 30mg, twice daily, for 12 weeks. Patients were evaluated for improvement in their lesions, based on the physician's global assessment (PGA), subject global assessment (SGA), and target area lesion symptom score (TALSS). Results: A total of 34 patients were included in the study; 26 patients completed the study duration and were considered for the final analysis. After 12 weeks, 34.61% (n = 9/26) patients showed 2 or more grade improvement in their disease as per PGA. About 42.30% (n = 11/26) patients achieved more than 50% improvement in their lesions based on the subject global assessment of their disease. There was a significant improvement in TALSS during the study period (p < 0.0001). Only 23.07% (n = 6/26) patients developed one or more adverse events because of Apremilast with headache being the commonest side effect. Conclusion: The results obtained in our study justify that Apremilast is efficacious and safe in the management of patients with lichen planus. Based on these results, Apremilast can be considered as a promising alternative treatment option in patients with lichen planus.

An Open-Label, Randomized, Prospective, Comparative, Three-Arm Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Apremilast with Three Different Titration Methods in Patients with Chronic Plaque Psoriasis in India.

Purpose: To minimize adverse effects (AEs), apremilast is recommended to titrate at the initiation of therapy. But still, many patients experience AEs, resulting in discontinuation of therapy. As a result, many dermatologists have adapted to further titrate apremilast in different ways. The present study was planned to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of apremilast in different dose titration methods as initiation therapy in the treatment of plaque psoriasis. Patients and Methods: In this open-label, randomized, prospective, comparative, three-arm, single center study, 128 plaque psoriasis patients were included. Patients were randomized into three groups. Group I received standard titration for the first 6 days; Group II received all tablets in a starter pack as once a day (OD) total for 13 days; and Group III received two starter packs as 8 tablets each of apremilast 10 mg and 20 mg as OD and 10 tablets of 30 mg as OD, in total for 26 days. All groups received apremilast 30 mg as twice a day after initial titration. The total duration of apremilast therapy in all groups was 16 weeks. Results: In safety assessment, AEs were reported in 50%, 41.3% and 25% in Groups I, II and III, respectively (p <0.05) with nausea being the most common AE. In Group I, 10.53% of patients discontinued apremilast whereas 6.52% and 2.27% discontinued in Groups II and III respectively. Maximum number of AEs were seen in Group I in first week only (74.19%) compared with other groups. At week 16, on the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, PASI 75 was achieved in 31.43%, 42.4% and 33.3% of patients in Groups I, II and III, respectively with no statistical difference between any groups. Conclusion: It can be concluded that slower titration is a useful strategy for minimizing AEs while at the same time maintaining effectiveness of apremilast.