Surface hydrophobicity modulates the operation of actomyosin-based dynamic nanodevices.

We studied the impact of surface hydrophobicity on the motility of actin filaments moving on heavy-meromyosin (HMM)-coated surfaces. Apart from nitrocellulose (NC), which is the current standard for motility assays, all materials tested are good candidates for microfabrication: hydrophilic and hydrophobic glass, poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), poly(tert-butyl methacrylate) (PtBuMA), and a copolymer of O-acryloyl acetophenone oxime with a 4-acryloyloxybenzophenone (AAPO). The most hydrophilic (hydrophilic glass, contact angle 35 degrees) and the most hydrophobic (PtBuMA, contact angle 78 degrees) surfaces do not maintain the motility of actin filaments, presumably because of the low density of adsorbed HMM protein or its high levels of denaturation, respectively. The velocity of actin filaments presents higher values in the middle of this "surface hydrophobicity motility window" (NC, PMMA), and a bimodal distribution, which is more apparent at the edges of this motility window (hydrophobic glass and AAPO). A molecular surface analysis of HMM and its S1 units suggests that the two very different, temporally separated conformations of the HMM heads could exacerbate the surface-modulated protein behavior, which is common to all microdevices using surface-immobilized proteins. An explanation for the above behavior proposes that the motility of actin filaments on HMM-functionalized surfaces is the result of the action of three populations of motors, each in a different surface-protein conformation, that is, HMM with both heads working (high velocities), working with one head (low velocities), and fully denatured HMM (no motility). It is also proposed that the molecularly dynamic nature of polymer surfaces amplifies the impact of surface hydrophobicity on protein behavior. The study demonstrates that PMMA is a good candidate for the fabrication of future actomyosin-driven dynamic nanodevices because it induces the smoothest motility of individual nano-objects with velocities comparable with those obtained on NC.

Elevated urokinase-specific surface receptor expression is maintained through its interaction with urokinase plasminogen activator.

Urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) and its receptor (uPAR) are overexpressed in various neoplasms, and play a key role in tumor progression and metastasis. In this study, we examined uPA and uPAR expression in a variety of human breast cancer cell lines and found that lines with elevated uPA expression also exhibited high uPAR expression, suggesting the possibility that uPA and uPAR are regulated in concert. To test this possibility, we introduced antisense uPA RNA and antisense uPAR RNA in MDA-MB-231 and BT-549 lines that express high levels of uPA and uPAR. Antisense uPA RNA not only downregulated uPA expression, but also greatly reduced uPAR expression in both lines. However, antisense uPAR RNA-reduced uPAR expression with no apparent inhibitory effect on the levels of uPA. These results indicate that expression of uPAR requires uPA but not vice versa. With a panel of uPA and uPAR monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), we observed that the mAbs disrupting uPA and uPAR interaction, rather than mAb inhibiting uPA protease activity, reduced uPAR expression. Moreover, adding soluble single chain uPA (scuPA) to MDA-MB-231 or BT-549 cells expressing antisense uPA mRNA-restored uPAR expression. These findings suggest that uPA dictates uPAR expression and that uPA binding to uPAR transmits signals for uPAR expression. Finally, we provided evidence that Fyn, a Src family kinase, is involved in uPA-induced uPAR expression.

A simplified cloning strategy for the generation of an endothelial cell selective recombinant adenovirus vector.

Specifically targeting adenoviral vectors to particular cell/tissue types can be achieved by genetically modifying the adenovirus fiber protein. Two common strategies are: (1) directly modifying the fiber gene in the adenovirus genome and (2) in trans supply of the modified fiber. The former however, suffers from difficulties in directly manipulating large adenoviral genomic DNA. Although the latter allows easy manipulation of the small fiber gene, our studies show that the in trans supplement of the modified fiber causes incomplete fiber assimilation in the virus. Thus an alternate cloning strategy was devised to facilitate the insertion of cell-targeting sequences into the HI loop of a CAR binding-ablated fiber gene in the Ad5 genomic backbone. Our approach retains the advantage of easily modifying the fiber with the additional benefit of genetic re-insertion into the Ad genomic backbone to ensure complete modified fiber incorporation. Using this strategy, an endothelial cell binding peptide sequence (Asn-Gly-Arg) was introduced into the Ad fiber and showed that the generated Ad vector displayed selective transduction of endothelial cells both in vitro and in vivo compared to the conventional vector. Furthermore, this Ad vector cloning strategy can be adapted to introduce other peptide sequences to target other cell types.

Signaling mechanisms responsible for lysophosphatidic acid-induced urokinase plasminogen activator expression in ovarian cancer cells.

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) enhances urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) expression in ovarian cancer cells; however, the molecular mechanisms responsible for this event have not been investigated. In this study, we used the invasive ovarian cancer SK-OV-3 cell line to explore the signaling molecules and pathways essential for LPA-induced uPA up-regulation. With the aid of specific inhibitors and dominant negative forms of signaling molecules, we determined that the G(i)-associated pathway mediates this LPA-induced event. Moreover, constitutively active H-Ras and Raf-1-activating H-Ras mutant enhance uPA expression, whereas dominant negative H-Ras and Raf-1 block LPA-induced uPA up-regulation, suggesting that the Ras-Raf pathway works downstream of G(i) to mediate this LPA-induced process. Surprisingly, dominant negative MEK1 or Erk2 displays only marginal inhibitory effect on LPA-induced uPA up-regulation, suggesting that a signaling pathway distinct from Raf-MEK1/2-Erk is the prominent pathway responsible for this process. In this report, we demonstrate that LPA activates NF-kappaB in a Ras-Raf-dependent manner and that blocking NF-kappaB activation with either non-phosphorylable IkappaB or dominant negative IkappaB kinase abolished LPA-induced uPA up-regulation and uPA promoter activation. Furthermore, introducing mutations to knock out the NF-kappaB binding site of the uPA promoter results in over 80% reduction in LPA-induced uPA promoter activation, whereas this activity is largely intact with the promoter containing mutations in the AP1 binding sites. Thus these results suggest that the G(i)-Ras-Raf-NF-kappaB signaling cascade is responsible for LPA-induced uPA up-regulation in ovarian cancer cells.

p38 Mitogen-activated protein kinase regulation of endothelial cell migration depends on urokinase plasminogen activator expression.

The migration of endothelial cells in response to various stimulating factors plays an essential role in angiogenesis. The p38 MAPK pathway has been implicated to play an important role in endothelial cell migration because inhibiting p38 MAPK activity down-regulates vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-stimulated migration. Currently, the signaling components in the p38 MAPK activation pathway and especially the mechanisms responsible for p38 MAPK-regulated endothelial cell migration are not well understood. In the present study, we found that p38 MAPK activity is required for endothelial cell migration stimulated by both VEGF and nongrowth factor stimulants, sphingosine 1-phosphate and soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule. By using dominant negative forms of signaling components in the p38 MAPK pathway, we identified that a regulatory pathway consisting of MKK3-p38alpha/gamma-MAPK-activated protein kinase 2 participated in VEGF-stimulated migration. In further studies, we showed that a minimum of a 10-h treatment with SB203580 (specific p38 MAPK inhibitor) was needed to block VEGF-stimulated migration, suggesting an indirect role of p38 MAPK in this cellular event. Most interestingly, the occurrence of SB203580-induced migratory inhibition coincided with a reduction of urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) expression. Furthermore, agents disrupting uPA and uPA receptor interaction abrogated VEGF-stimulated cell migration. These results suggest a possible association between cell migration and uPA expression. Indeed, VEGF-stimulated migration was not compromised by SB203580 in endothelial cells expressing the uPA transgene; however, VEGF-stimulated migration was inhibited by agents disrupting uPA-uPA receptor interaction. These results thus suggest that the p38 MAPK pathway participates in endothelial cell migration by regulating uPA expression.

Lysophosphatidic Acid Stimulates Ovarian Cancer Cell Migration via a Ras-MEK Kinase 1 Pathway.

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) is present at high concentrations in ascites and plasma of ovarian cancer patients. Studies conducted in experimental models demonstrate that LPA promotes ovarian cancer invasion/metastasis by up-regulating protease expression, elevating protease activity, and enhancing angiogenic factor expression. In this study, we investigated the effect of LPA on ovarian cancer migration, an essential component of cancer cell invasion. LPA stimulates both chemotaxis and chemokinesis of ovarian cancer cells and LPA-stimulated cell migration is G(I) dependent. Moreover, constitutively active H-Ras enhances ovarian cancer cell migration, whereas dominant negative H-Ras blocks LPA-stimulated cell migration, suggesting that Ras works downstream of G(i) to mediate LPA-stimulated cell migration. Interestingly, H-Ras mutants that specifically activate Raf-1, Ral-GDS, or phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase are unable to significantly enhance ovarian cancer cell migration, suggesting that a Ras downstream effector distinct from Raf-1, Ral-GDS, and phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase is responsible for LPA-stimulated cell migration. In this article, we demonstrate that LPA activates mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1 (MEKK1) in a G(i)-Ras-dependent manner and that MEKK1 activity is essential for LPA-stimulated ovarian cancer cell migration. Inhibitors that block MEKK1 downstream pathways, including MEK1/2, MKK4/7, and nuclear factor-kappa B pathways, do not significantly alter LPA-stimulated cell migration. Instead, LPA induces the redistribution of focal adhesion kinase to focal contact regions of the cytoplasm membrane, and this event is abolished by pertussis toxin, dominant negative H-Ras, or dominant negative MEKK1. Our studies thus suggest that the G(i)-Ras-MEKK1 signaling pathway mediates LPA-stimulated ovarian cancer cell migration by facilitating focal adhesion kinase redistribution to focal contacts.

Rac1-MKK3-p38-MAPKAPK2 pathway promotes urokinase plasminogen activator mRNA stability in invasive breast cancer cells.

We reported previously that down-regulating or functionally blocking alphav integrins inhibits endogenous p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) activity and urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) expression in invasive MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells whereas engaging alphav integrins with vitronectin activates p38 MAPK and up-regulates uPA expression (Chen, J., Baskerville, C., Han, Q., Pan, Z., and Huang, S. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 47901-47905). Currently, it is not clear what upstream and downstream signaling molecules of p38 MAPK mediate alphav integrin-mediated uPA up-regulation. In the present study, we found that alphav integrin ligation activated small GTPase Rac1 preferentially, and dominant negative Rac1 inhibited alphav integrin-mediated p38 MAPK activation. Using constitutively active MAPK kinases, we found that both constitutively active MKK3 and MKK6 mutants were able to activate p38 MAPK and up-regulate uPA expression, but only dominant negative MKK3 blocked alphav integrin-mediated p38 MAPK activation and uPA up-regulation. These results suggest that MKK3, rather than MKK6, mediates alphav integrin-induced p38 MAPK activation. Among the potential downstream effectors of p38 MAPK, we found that only MAPK-activated protein kinase 2 affects alphav integrin-mediated uPA up-regulation significantly. Finally, using beta-globin reporter gene constructs containing uPA mRNA 3'-untranslated region (UTR) and adenosine/uridine-rich elements-deleted 3'-UTR, we demonstrated that p38 MAPK/MAPK-activated protein kinase 2 signaling pathway regulated uPA mRNA stability through a mechanism involving the adenosine/uridine-rich elements sequence in 3'-UTR of uPA mRNA.