Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Associated Myocarditis: A Literature Review.

Recently in the field of oncology, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are being increasingly utilized both in clinical trials and in clinical practice. It is a form of biological therapy that targets tumors by activating the immune system, which in turn eliminates proliferating cancer cells. These have numerous immune-related adverse events (irAEs), one of which is myocarditis, which has high rates of mortality. This article was a narrative review of myocarditis related to ICI use.  Studies from the PubMed, Cochrane, and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) databases were used in writing this review. The databases were searched for original publications for adverse effects related to ICI use and myocarditis specifically. There are numerous published instances of cancer immunotherapy causing myocarditis. ICI therapy has numerous benefits, as it upregulates the immune system to target cancer cells, utilizing the body's own defense mechanisms to target proliferating cells. Myocarditis is a serious side effect, however. Therefore, on balance, these monotherapies are worth using. While this literature review primarily identifies cross-reaction as the main mechanism of myocarditis, there are other possible mechanisms. One proposed mechanism involves a shared antigen between the myocardial tissue and the tumor. This mechanism is called molecular mimicry, where the monoclonal antibody attacks both the myocardial tissue and the tumor cell. Management of ICI-induced myocarditis has not been studied by randomized controlled trials or prospective studies, but based on previous case reports and case series it is mostly treated with steroids initially. An ICI rechallenge after temporary discontinuation appears conceivable in many cases, especially given its therapeutic effects, but only limited data are available on the safety of a rechallenge after an irAE. The lack of RCTs regarding rechallenge with an ICI after irAE, more so specifically about myocarditis, along with the overall results and the complexity involved in such cases once again emphasize the need to make decisions on an individual basis by a multidisciplinary expert working group. At the same time, the focus should also be on publishing more data as the need will grow along with the indications for ICI therapies.

Total Body Irradiation Versus Chemotherapy Conditioning in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patients Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is indicated in pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who have relapsed or are at a very high risk of relapse during first complete remission. Two types of myeloablative conditioning are employed before allogeneic HSCT: total body irradiation (TBI)-based regimens and chemotherapy (CHT) alone. This study compares the efficacy and safety of TBI-based regimens and CHT-based conditioning in pediatric, adolescent, and young adult patients with ALL (0-24 years old). TBI-based and CHT-conditioning regimens were evaluated in 4262 and 1367 patients, respectively, from 15 studies. Compared to CHT alone, TBI-based regimens were associated with better overall survival (OS), relative risk (RR) 1.21, better event-free survival (RR 1.34), and a reduced risk of relapse (RR 0.69). Both approaches had comparable risk of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), grades 3 to 4 acute GVHD, chronic GVHD, and nonrelapse mortality (NRM). In the subgroup analysis for patients in first complete remission, TBI-based regimens and CHT alone had comparable OS and NRM. Our results demonstrate the superiority of TBI-based regimens compared to CHT alone in pediatric patients with ALL.

The Safety and Efficacy of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Evaluation of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) usage in heart failure (HF) patients with or without type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) could be proven to be a critical breakthrough in treatment options available for these patients. Our study focuses on understanding the safety and efficacy of GLP-1 RAs in this patient population by pooling the data from 9 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comprising 871 subjects. As compared with the placebo, GLP-1 RAs did not improve major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) which include cardiovascular (CV) mortality and heart failure (HF) hospitalizations, our primary outcome. CV mortality (RR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.56-1.88, P = 0.92) and HF hospitalizations (RR = 1.18, 95%CI = 0.93-1.51, P = 0.18). Similarly, GLP-1 RAs did not improve our secondary findings of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and 6-minute walk test (6MWT). LVEF (RR = 1.96, 95%CI = -0.16-4.07, P = 0.07) or 6 MWT (RR = 8.43, 95% CI = -2.69-19.56, P = 0.14). This meta-analysis shows that GLP-1 RAs do not improve cardiovascular outcomes in HF patients with or without T2DM.

Atrophic Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans with Eosinophilic Infiltration.

Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) is a rare, locally aggressive spindle cell mesenchymal tumor arising in the dermis, with low metastatic potential. The most commonly affected sites are the trunk and proximal extremities; rarely are acral sites involved. Atrophic DFSP is a rare form of DFSP, that is morphologically different but histologically similar to DFSP. It commonly affects young adults between the ages of 20 to 50 years. The current management strategy for atrophic DFSP is surgical excision with long-term follow-up to detect any recurrence. Only one known case of atrophic DFSP with eosinophilic infiltration is what makes our case an exceptionally rare presentation.

Nivolumab, a Double-Edged Sword: A Case Report of Nivolumab-Induced Myasthenia Gravis.

Nivolumab is a checkpoint inhibitor approved to treat various solid organs malignancies. Although checkpoint inhibitors are very efficacious, these medications are also associated with a variety of side effects that could be life-threatening. We present a case of nivolumab-induced myasthenia gravis in a patient with stage IV esophageal cancer, who was found to have generalized weakness, blurry vision, diplopia, and later developed acute hypoxic respiratory failure with subsequent intubation. The patient was treated with intravenous immunoglobulin and plasmapheresis, and later started on pyridostigmine and high-dose steroids with minimal improvement. Goals of care were discussed with the patient and family, and the decision was made to discharge the patient home with hospice care. Nivolumab-induced myasthenia gravis is very aggressive with a poor prognosis if not appropriately managed in time. Hence we strongly recommend a multidisciplinary approach, including neurologists, to monitor patients on nivolumab therapy to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with it.