Equivalent revision rates and patient reported outcomes with routine use of a short (125mm) cemented stem for total hip arthroplasty compared to a standard length (150mm) cemented stem. A two surgeon series of 1335 patients.

BACKGROUND: Routine total hip arthroplasty (THA) using a short cemented stem as compared with a standard length cemented stem may have benefits in terms of stress distribution, bone preservation, stem subsidence and ease of revision surgery. Two senior arthroplasty surgeons transitioned their routine femoral implant from a standard 150 mm Exeter V40 cemented stem to a short 125 mm Exeter V40 cemented stem for all patients over the course of several years. We analysed revision rates, adjusted survival, and PROMS scores for patients who received a standard stem and a short stem in routine THA. METHODS: All THAs performed by the two surgeons between January 2011 and December 2021 were included. All procedures were performed using either a 150 mm or 125 mm Exeter V40 stem. Demographic data, acetabular implant type, and outcome data including implant survival, reason for revision, and post-operative Oxford Hip Scores were obtained from the New Zealand Joint Registry (NZJR), and detailed survival analyses were performed. Primary outcome was revision for any reason. Reason for revision, including femoral or acetabular failure, and time to revision were also recorded. RESULTS: 1335 THAs were included. 516 using the 150 mm stem and 819 using the 125 mm stem. There were 4055.5 and 3227.8 component years analysed in the standard stem and short stem groups respectively due to a longer mean follow up in the 150 mm group. Patient reported outcomes were comparable across all groups. Revision rates were comparable between the standard 150 mm stem (0.44 revisions/100 component years) and the short 125 mm stem (0.56 revisions/100 component years) with no statistically significant difference found (p = 0.240). CONCLUSION: Routine use of a short 125 mm stem had no statistically significant impact on revision rate or PROMS scores when compared to a standard 150 mm stem. There may be benefits to routine use of a short cemented femoral implant.

Defining the proximity of the axillary nerve from defined anatomic landmarks: an in vivo magnetic resonance imaging study.

BACKGROUND: The location of the axillary nerve in the shoulder makes it vulnerable to traumatic or iatrogenic injury. Cadaveric studies have reported the location of the axillary nerve but are limited because of tissue compression, dehydration, and decay. Three-Tesla (T) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allows high anatomic resolution of neural structures. The aim of our study was to better define the location of the axillary nerve from defined bony surgical landmarks in vivo, using MRI scan. METHODS: Using MRI, we defined a number of anatomic points and measured the distance from these to the perineural fat surrounding the axillary nerve using simultaneous tracker lines on both images. Two observers were used. RESULTS: A total of 187 consecutive 3-T MRI shoulder scans were included. Mean age was 57.9 years (range 18-86). The axillary nerve was located at a mean of 14.1 mm inferior from the bony glenoid at the anterior border, 11.9 mm from the midpoint, and 12.0 mm from the posterior border. There was a significant difference between distance at the anterior border and midpoint (P < .001), and between the anterior and posterior borders (P < .001). The axillary nerve was located at a mean of 12.6 mm medial to the humeral shaft at the anterior border, 9.9 mm at the midpoint, and 8.6 mm from the posterior border. There was a significant difference between distance at the anterior border and midpoint (P = .008) and between the anterior and posterior borders (P = .002). The mean distance of the axillary nerve from the anterolateral edge of the acromion was 53.3 mm (95% confidence interval [CI] 52.3, 54.2; range 33.9-76.3). The mean distance of the axillary nerve from the inferior edge of the capsule was 2.7 mm (95% CI 2.9, 3.1; range 0.3-9.9). There was a positive correlation between humeral head diameter and axillary nerve distance from the inferior glenoid (R2 = 0.061, P < .001). There was a positive correlation between humeral head diameter and distance from the anterolateral edge of the acromion (R2 = 0.140, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Our study has defined the proximity of the axillary nerve from defined anatomic landmarks. The proximity of the axillary nerve to the inferior glenoid and medial humeral shaft changes as the axillary nerve passes from anterior to posterior. The distance of the axillary nerve from the anterolateral edge of the acromion remains relatively constant. Both sets of distances may be affected by humeral head size. The study has relevance to the shoulder surgeon when considering "safe zones" during arthroscopic or open surgery.