Niche diversification follows key innovation in Antarctic fish radiation.

Antarctic notothenioid fishes provide a fascinating evolutionary laboratory for the study of adaptive radiation, as their diversification is linked to both isolation in an extreme environment and a key innovation that allows them to exploit it. In this issue of Molecular Ecology, Rutschmann et al. (2011) evaluate how dietary niche differences have evolved in notothenioids: rarely, or repeatedly in multiple lineages. The authors use stable isotopes to measure species' use of benthic vs. pelagic resources and map resource use onto a molecular phylogeny. Their findings indicate that pelagic diets have evolved in multiple lineages in at least two families, indicating that dietary niche diversification has occurred repeatedly and in parallel.

Nonlinear selection and the evolution of variances and covariances for continuous characters in an anole.

The pattern of genetic variances and covariances among characters, summarized in the additive genetic variance-covariance matrix, G, determines how a population will respond to linear natural selection. However, G itself also evolves in response to selection. In particular, we expect that, over time, G will evolve correspondence with the pattern of multivariate nonlinear natural selection. In this study, we substitute the phenotypic variance-covariance matrix (P) for G to determine if the pattern of multivariate nonlinear selection in a natural population of Anolis cristatellus, an arboreal lizard from Puerto Rico, has influenced the evolution of genetic variances and covariances in this species. Although results varied among our estimates of P and fitness, and among our analytic techniques, we find significant evidence for congruence between nonlinear selection and P, suggesting that natural selection may have influenced the evolution of genetic constraint in this species.

Dextroamphetamine with morphine for the treatment of postoperative pain.

In a double-blind, single-dose study, dextroamphetamine combined with morphine was compared with morphine alone to determine the relative efficacy of the combination given intramuscularly for postoperative pain. Each of 450 patients received one treatment of morphine sulfate (3, 6 or 12 mg) with dextroamphetamine (0, 5 or 10 mg). Analgesia, as measured by the patients' subjective responses to questions about relief of pain, was augmented when dextroamphetamine was given with morphine; the combination of dextroamphetamine, 10 mg, with morphine was twice as potent as morphine alone, and the combination with 5 mg was 1 1/2 times as potent as morphine. In simple performance tests, and in measures of side effects, dextroamphetamine generally offset undesirable effects of morphine (sedation and loss of alertness) while increasing analgesia. Effects on blood pressure, pulse and respiratory rate were minimal.

Combined routes of administration to assay oral analgesia in postoperative pain.

To increase the sensitivity of the method for evaluating oral analgesics in postoperative patients, we designed a combined oral/parenteral bioassay. Drugs studied were parenteral morphine, parenteral propiram, and oral codeine at two dose levels each and oral propiram at four dose levels. Results from data on 308 patients suggest that future studies designed to establish the relative potencies of oral analgesics should use parenteral morphine as the standard in a combined oral/parenteral study because this approach provides a very sensitive measure of analgesia. Further, with one drug as the reference compound, results from many sources would be more readily compared.

Assay of aspirin and naproxen analgesia.

To establish the relative potency of naproxen and aspirin for oral analgesia, a 4-point, noncrossover bioassay with placebo control was undertaken with 197 patients. Subjective-response methods were used to determine two measures of postoperative analgesia over a period of 6 hr. With reasonable confidence for an oral analgesic assay, we found 220 mg of naproxen to be equivalent to 600 mg of aspirin for pain relief and 330 mg of naproxen to be equivalent to 600 mg of aspirin for decreased pain intensity.

Relative analgesic potencies of morphine and hydromorphone in postoperative pain.

Because of discrepancies in the estimates of the relative analgesic potencies of hydromorphone and morphine, the drugs were compared in two four-point, double-blind bioassays. In the first study, hydromorphone, 1 and 2 mg, was compared with morphine, 5 and 10 mg, in 31 postoperative patients; in the second, hydromorphone, 0.5 and 1 mg, was compared with morphine, 5 and 10 mg, in 112 postoperative patients. Subjective responses to nurse-observer questions were used to quantitate analgesia for postoperative pain. Hydromorphone is more potent than commonly believed: approximately 0.9 to 1.2 mg is equianalgesic with 10 mg of morphine, with a similar incidence of side effects.

Hypnotic efficacy of diphenhydramine, methapyrilene, and pentobarbital.

The antihistamines diphenhydramine and methapyrilene were compared with pentobarbital for hypnotic effect in two Veterans Administration Hospital populations using subjective-response methods. In the first part of the study, 60 mg and 180 mg of pentobarbital were compared with 50 mg and 150 mg of diphenhydramine. A positive dose-response relationship was obtained only for pentobarbital; neither dose of diphenhydramine was significantly different from 60 mg of pentobarbital for any response variable. In the second part of the study, 100 mg of pentobarbital, 50 mg of diphenhydramine, and 50 mg of diphenhydramine, and 50 mg of methapyrilene were compared with placebo. One hundred mg of pentobarbital and 50 mg of diphenhydramine were significantly different from placebo, but 50 mg of methapyrilene was not.