Unravelling variations: an examination of entry point selection in proximal femoral cephalomedullary nailing.

BACKGROUND: The exact positioning of the cephalomedullary (CM) nail entry point for managing femoral fractures remains debatable, with significant implications for fracture reduction and postoperative complications. This study aimed to explore the variability in the selection of the entry point among trauma surgeons, hypothesizing potential differences and their association with surgeon experience. METHODS: In this prospective multicenter study, 16 participants, ranging from residents to senior specialists, partook in a simulation wherein they determined the optimal entry point for the implantation of a proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFN-A; DePuy Synthes) in various femora. The inter- and intra-observer variability was calculated, along with comprehensive descriptive statistical analysis, to assess the variability in entry point selection and the impact of surgeon experience. RESULTS: In this study, the mean distance from the selected entry points to the calculated mean entry point was 3.98 mm, with a smaller distance observed among surgeons with more than 500 implantations (ANOVA, p = 0.050). Intra-surgeon variability for identical femora averaged at 5.14 mm, showing no significant differences across various levels of surgical experience or training. Notably, 13.6% of selected entry points would not allow a proper intramedullary positioning of the implant, thereby rendering anatomical repositioning unfeasible. Among these impossible entry points, a significant skew towards anterior placement was observed (70.6% of the impossible entry points), with a smaller fraction being overly lateral (27.5%) or medial (13.7%). On a patient level, the impossibility rate varied widely from 0 to 35% among the different femora examined, with a significantly higher rate seen in younger patients (mean age 55.02 versus 60.32; t-test for independent samples, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Significant variations exist in surgeons' selection of entry points for proximal femoral nailing, underscoring the task's complexity. Experience does not prevent the choice of unfeasible entry points, emphasizing the inadequacy of a universal approach and pointing towards the necessity for a patient-specific strategy for improved outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00032465.

[Surgery during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic : Recommendations on operative procedures]. / Chirurgie in der SARS-CoV-2-Pandemie : Empfehlungen zum operativen Vorgehen.

BACKGROUND: In February 2020 Germany was also hit by the SARS-CoV­2 pandemic. Even patients infected by SARS-CoV­2 or COVID-19 may need operative procedures. Currently, no uniform recommendations exist on precautions to be taken when operating on these patients. Furthermore, they may differ from one hospital to another. METHODS: The task force COVID-19 of the emergency, intensive and severely injured section of the German Trauma Society (DGU e. V.) has developed consensus-based recommendations on surgical treatment of patients with SARS-CoV­2 infections. Great importance is placed on the implementation in hospitals at all levels of care. RESULTS: The indications for surgical interventions in patients with COVID-19 infections require an extremely critical evaluation. When indicated these surgical intervention should ideally be performed in a separate operating theater. All personnel involved should wear personal protective equipment with FFP2 masks, face shields and double gloves. The emergency team in the resuscitation bay should generally wear the same personal protective equipment. Special training is mandatory and the exposure of team members should be minimized. CONCLUSION: The recommendations are principally used for all kinds of surgery and comply with the currently available knowledge. Nevertheless, all recommendations represent a compromise between maximum safety of all medical staff and practicability in the routine hospital workflow.

Is dopexamine superior to dopamine in the treatment of multiple trauma patients--a prospective, double-blind, randomised study.

BACKGROUND: The goal of this prospective, randomised, double-blind clinical trial study was to assess the effects of dopexamine hydrochloride on organ failure, inflammatory mediators and splanchnic oxygenation in blunt multiple trauma patients at high risk of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS). METHODS: We performed a prospective randomised controlled trial on 30 consecutive blunt multiple trauma patients with ISS>or=16, age 18-60 years and initial blood pressure >or=120 mmHg initially admitted to our level I trauma centre. Patients were randomised to treatment with dopamine (n=15) or dopexamine (n=15) for 48 h after admission. Outcome in terms of mortality, MODS, splanchnic perfusion, complications, duration of stay was statistically analysed. RESULTS: Dopexamine treatment was associated with impaired organ function and an increased duration of ventilation and ICU stay compared with patients who received dopamine treatment. The acute inflammatory response was increased in the Dopexamine group while a decreased pHi and MEGX formation and increased serum lactate levels were measured. CONCLUSIONS: The indication to use dopexamine hydrochloride appears questionable. In the absence of an antiinflammatory effect, dopexamine demonstrated a disadvantageous ICU course in regards to the organ function and the duration of treatment. In addition, a decreased pHi and MEGX formation suggested a deterioration of splanchnic oxygenation.

30 years of polytrauma care: An analysis of the change in strategies and results of 4849 cases treated at a single institution.

The quality and progress of treatment of 4849 multiple trauma patients treated at one institution was reviewed retrospectively. Three periods, 1975-1984 (decade I; n=1469) and 1985-1994 (decade II; n=1937) and 1995-2004 (decade III; n=1443) were compared. 65% of multiple trauma patients had cerebral injuries, 58% thoracic trauma and 81% extremity fractures (37% open injuries). Injury combinations decreased during all decades with head/extremity injuries being the most common combination. Throughout the three decades pre-hospital care became more aggressive with an increase of intravenous fluid resuscitation (I: 80%, II: 97%, III: 98%). Chest tube insertion decreased after an initial increase (I: 41%, II: 83%, III: 27%) as well as intubation (I: 82%, II: 94%, III: 59%). Rescue times were progressively shortened. For initial clinical diagnosis of massive abdominal haemorrhage ultrasound (I: 17%, II: 92%, III: 97%) replaced peritoneal lavage (I: 44%, II: 28%, III: 0%). CT-scans were used more frequently for the initial diagnosis of head injuries and other injuries to the trunk throughout the observation time. With regard to complications, acute renal failure decreased by half (I: 8.4%; II: 3.7%; III: 3.9%), ARDS initially decreased but increased again in the last decade (I: 18.1%, II: 13.4%, III: 15.3%), whereas the rate of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) increased continuously (I: 14.2%, II: 18.9%, III: 19.8%) probably due to a decline of the mortality rate from 37% in the first to 22% in the second and 18% in the third decade and parallel increase of the time of death. These treatment results summarise the enormous clinical effort as well as medical progress in polytrauma management over the past 30 years. Further reduction of mortality is desirable, but probably only possible when immediate causal therapy of later posttraumatic organ failure can be established.

L-selectin shows time and gender dependency in association with MODS.

BACKGROUND: Recent investigations have demonstrated gender related immunologic alterations after trauma. These complications arise due to polymorphonuclear granulocytes (PMN) interacting with endothelium via L-selectin. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate gender related differences in the expression of L-selectin in relation to posttraumatic multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS). METHODS: Multiply injured patients were prospectively entered in the study. MODS was determined using the Denver score. The concentration of L-selectin on the surface of PMN was determined using flow cytometry during a 14 days' period. RESULTS: 48 patients were included in the study. The kinetics of L-selectin were different comparing male and female patients. Male patients with MODS initially showed a rapid decrease of surface L-selectin from 80 to 20 ng/ml. A return to admission levels was related to MODS. Male patients without MODS displayed elevated L-selectin levels up to 140 ng/ml. Female patients, however, all showed an initial rapid decrease of L-selectin to 20 ng/ml. Women who developed posttraumatic MODS had significantly increased levels up to 110 ng/ml before development of MODS developed. CONCLUSIONS: We feel that a gender related dimorphism in the initial L-selectin expression following trauma exists and is associated with MODS. These findings indicate new therapeutic means for the treatment of MODS. Therapies should be timely and gender dependently coordinated.