Residents' self-perceived errors in transitions of care in the emergency department.

BACKGROUND: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requirements for systems-based practice state residents are expected to participate in identifying system errors and implementing potential systems solutions. The objective of this study was to determine the numbers of perceived errors occurring from patient pass offs between resident physicians in our emergency department. METHODS: Using a prospective observational study, we queried emergency medicine residents about perceived errors in the transition of care using trained research assistants and a standardized protocol. Transition of care was defined as the transfer of responsibility to evaluate and treat and disposition of a patient in the emergency department from 1 resident physician to a second oncoming emergency department resident physician. Mean resident-perceived errors per shift and per patient transfer of care were calculated. Additionally, the mean number of perceived errors impacting patients was calculated. RESULTS: Emergency medicine residents on 107 shifts reported receiving 713 patients in pass off with a mean of 7 patients per physician per shift, with 40% of patients passed off needing some intervention (mean of 2.8 patients per provider per shift). Nineteen of the 107 shifts (17.8%) during which a resident took patients from a prior provider had a perceived error in at least 1 patient signed off. Of the 713 patients transitioned, the receiving physician perceived an error related to the transition of care for 23. Two of the 23 errors were determined by reviewing emergency medicine attendings to not be errors, and for 9 the receiving physician perceived an impact on the patient. All were delays in care or disposition. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest emergency medicine residents were able to perceive errors related to transitions of care, describe the types of pass-off errors, and, to a lesser degree, describe the impact these errors have on patients.

Necessity of hospital admission for pediatric minor head injury.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the need for mandatory hospital admission of all pediatric patients with minor head injury (MHI) and negative computed tomographic (CT) scans for head injury. The study was a retrospective chart review of all patients admitted to a pediatric trauma service over a period of 4 years. MHI was defined as blunt head trauma with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 15 and a nonfocal neurological examination. Only patients < or = 13 years of age and with a negative head CT scan were included, and during hospitalization all patients were observed for delayed complications. A total of 197 patients met the inclusion criteria. The patients' mean age was 7.1 years, with a range of 2 months to 13 years. The most common mechanisms of injury were being struck by a motor vehicle while walking (82 patients), and falling (75 patients). No complications were observed, and although persistent symptoms occurred in 5 patients, they did not delay discharge. We conclude that pediatric patients with MHI and negative CT scans of the head do not require routine admission for observation for delayed complications.