Clinical significance of baseline Epstein-Barr virus DNA for recurrent or metastatic primary pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma.

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical significance of baseline Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA in recurrent or metastatic primary pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma (PLELC). Methods: 75 patients with baseline EBV DNA were included. The relationships between baseline EBV DNA and clinical characteristics, survival and objective response rate were analyzed. Results: The baseline EBV DNA levels were related to the liver, chest wall, distant lymph node(s) or multiple sites of distant metastasis. The high baseline EBV DNA group (≥41,900 copies/ml) was related to shorter progression-free and overall survival in univariate analysis and remained significant for progression-free survival in multivariate analysis. Conclusion: The baseline EBV DNA is a valuable biomarker for predicting prognosis and reflecting tumor burden in recurrent or metastatic PLELC.

CNS efficacy of afatinib as first-line treatment in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with EGFR mutations.

Background: Afatinib is a potent, irreversible second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor which has demonstrated efficacy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring either common or uncommon EGFR mutations. However, data on its activity against brain metastases are limited. This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of afatinib as first-line treatment for EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with brain metastases. Methods: Treatment-naive advanced NSCLC patients harboring EGFR mutations and brain metastases treated with afatinib were retrospectively reviewed to assess the central nervous system (CNS) efficacy and also the systematic benefits. Results: Totally 43 patients with measurable or non-measurable brain metastases were enrolled in the CNS full analysis (cFAS) set. Among them, 23 patients with measurable brain metastases were included in the CNS evaluable for response (cEFR) set. The CNS ORR was 48.8% (95% CI, 33.3 - 64.5%) in the cFAS set and 82.6% (95% CI, 61.2 - 95.0%) in the cEFR set, respectively. CNS mDoR was 8.9 months (95% CI, 4.7 - 13.1 months) and CNS mPFS was 12.7 months (95% CI, 6.9 - 18.5 months) in the cFAS set. In the subgroup analysis stratified by EGFR mutation types, CNS ORR of cEFR set in the common mutation cohort was 100% (95% CI, 75.3 - 100%) and 60% (95% CI, 26.2 - 87.8%) in the uncommon mutation cohort (p = 0.024); CNS ORR of cFAS set was 57.7% (95% CI, 36.9 - 76.6%) and 35.3% (95% CI, 14.2 - 61.7%), respectively (p = 0.151). CNS mPFS was 14.4 months in patients with common mutations and 6.1 months in patients with uncommon mutations (hazard ratio, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.22 - 1.00; p = 0.045). Patients with common mutations showed a significantly lower cumulative incidence of CNS failure than uncommon mutation cohort (p = 0.0026). Most of patients experienced grade 1/2 treatment-related adverse events. Conclusions: First-line afatinib demonstrated encouraging efficacy on brain metastases in NSCLC patients harboring either common or major uncommon EGFR mutations in a real-world setting, with manageable toxicities. Patients with common mutations showed better CNS outcomes than those with uncommon mutations.

Efficacy and safety of gemcitabine and capecitabine combination for patients with previously treated advanced primary pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma: a retrospective single-arm cohort study.

Background: Primary pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma (PLELC) is a rare and unique subtype of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Studies reporting on salvage treatment for pretreated PLELC are limited. Positive interactions between gemcitabine (GEM) and capecitabine (CAP) have been demonstrated in preclinical studies. In addition, the clinical benefit of the combination has been reported for other malignancies. However, the efficacy and safety of the combination for pretreated PLELC remain unclear. Therefore, we conducted this retrospective study to examine the activity and safety of gemcitabine plus capecitabine (GEM/CAP) combination for previously treated PLELC. Methods: Patients with PLELC at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center who received GEM combined with CAP between May 2013 and January 2021 as the second-line therapy or beyond were retrospectively enrolled. Treatment consisted of intravenous GEM (1,000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8) and oral CAP (1,000 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-14) every 3 weeks. Evaluation of response was performed every 2 cycles in accordance with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Safety was assessed in accordance with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Clinical characteristics were collected from medical records. The survival data were obtained by medical records or telephone. Follow-ups were performed until February 3rd, 2021. Results: A total of 16 patients were enrolled in this study. There were 5, 4, 4, and 3 patients treated with GEM/CAP combination as the second-, third-, fourth-, and fifth-line settings, respectively. There were 8 patients with partial response (PR) (50.00%), 6 with stable disease (SD) (37.50%), 2 with progressive disease (PD) (12.50%), and none with complete response (CR). The objective response rate and disease control rate (DCR) were 50.00% and 87.50%, respectively. The most common hematological and nonhematological adverse events (AEs) at any grade were neutropenia (31.25%) and hand-foot syndrome (43.75%). At a median follow-up of 29.3 months with 95% confidence interval (CI) of 20.3 to 38.3 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.3 months (95% CI: 6.5-12.1 months). The median overall survival (OS) was 41.5 months (95% CI: 3.1-79.8 months). Conclusions: This retrospective study demonstrated the potential clinical benefit of GEM in combination with CAP for pretreated PLELC. Future multicenter large-scale, prospective studies are warranted.