Checkpoint-inhibitor induced Polyserositis with Edema.

BACKGROUND: As immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are increasingly being used due to effectiveness in various tumor entities, rare side effects occur more frequently. Pericardial effusion has been reported in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after or under treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, knowledge about serositis and edemas induced by checkpoint inhibitors in other tumor entities is scarce. METHODS AND RESULTS: Four cases with sudden onset of checkpoint inhibitor induced serositis (irSerositis) are presented including one patient with metastatic cervical cancer, two with metastatic melanoma and one with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In all cases treatment with steroids was successful in the beginning, but did not lead to complete recovery of the patients. All patients required multiple punctures. Three of the patients presented with additional peripheral edema; in one patient only the lower extremities were affected, whereas the entire body, even face and eyelids were involved in the other patients. In all patients serositis was accompanied by other immune-related adverse events (irAEs). CONCLUSION: ICI-induced serositis and effusions are complex to diagnose and treat and might be underdiagnosed. For differentiation from malignant serositis pathology of the punctured fluid can be helpful (lymphocytes vs. malignant cells). Identifying irSerositis as early as possible is essential since steroids can improve symptoms.

Prediction of pathological complete response in breast cancer patients during neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Is shear wave elastography a useful tool in clinical routine?

OBJECTIVE: To compare the validity of Shear Wave Elastography (SWE) for the preoperative assessment of pathological complete response (pCR) to standard clinical assessment in breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective, consecutive clinical trial was conducted under routine clinical practice. Analysis included 134 patients. SWE served as index test, final pathology from surgical specimen as reference standard. PCR (ypT0) was defined as primary endpoint. Elasticity changes were compared for the pCR- vs. non-pCR group. To determine the validity of shear wave velocity (Vs), ROC analyses and diagnostic accuracy parameters were calculated and compared to the final standard clinical assessment by physical examination, mammography and B-mode ultrasound (ycT + vs. ycT0). RESULTS: Vs was significantly reduced in pCR and non-pCR groups during NACT (pCR: ΔVs(abs) = 3.90 m/s, p < 0.001; non-pCR: ΔVs(abs) = 3.10 m/s, p < 0.001). The pCR-group showed significant lower Vs for all control visits (t1,2,END: p < 0.001). ROC analysis of Vs yielded moderate AUCs for the total population (t0: 0.613, t1: 0.745, t2: 0.685, tEND: 0.718). Compared to standard clinical assessment, Vs(tEND) (cut-off: ≤3.35 m/s) was superior in sensitivity (79.6 % vs. 54.5 %), NPV (86.4 % vs. 77.5 %), FNR (20.4 % vs. 45.5 %), inferior in specificity (58.6 % vs. 77.5 %), PPV (46.3 % vs. 54.5 %), FPR (41.4 % vs. 22.5 %). CONCLUSION: SWE measures significant differences in tumour elasticity changes in pCR vs. non-pCR cases. SWE shows improved sensitivity compared to standard clinical assessment, high NPV and low FNR, but failed in specificity in order to predict pCR under routine conditions.