RESUMO
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to analyze and compare clinical outcomes of low-dose-rate (LDR) and high-dose-rate (HDR) interstitial brachytherapy boost (ISBT) after EBRT or radio chemotherapy for the treatment of anal canal cancers. METHODS AND MATERIALS: One hundred patients with anal canal cancers were treated at our institution by ISBT [LDR (n = 50); HDR (n = 50)]. Chronic toxicity rates, local control, disease-free survival, overall survival, and colostomy-free survival of the two different dose-rate brachytherapy modalities were analyzed and compared. RESULTS: With a median followup of 42.2 months (95% CI, [34.5-48.8]), 9 (9% [4.8-16.2%]) local recurrences were observed, 4 (8% [3.2-18.8%]) in LDR vs. 5 (10% [4.4-21.4%]) in HDR group (odds ratio [OR] = 1.28 [0.32-5.07], p = 0.73). The 5-year rate of local control for the entire population was 90% [81-95%], 93% [79-98%] vs. 86% [69-94%] for LDR and HDR, respectively (p = 0.38). The 5-year disease-free survival rate for all patients was 82% [71-90%], 88% [73-95%] vs. 72% [44-88%] for LDR and HDR, respectively (p = 0.21). The 5-year overall survival rate for global population was 94% [84-98%], with no significant differences between LDR (97% [79-100%]) and HDR (93% [80-98%]) (p = 0.27). The 5-year colostomy-free survival rate was 92% [83-96%], respectively, 95% [83-99%] vs. 86% [69-94%] for LDR and HDR (p = 0.21). Significant differences were found in terms of chronic toxicity rates, with 28 (56% [42.3-68.8%]) patients concerned in low-dose-rate brachytherapy vs. 17 (34% [22.4-47.9%]) in high-dose-rate brachytherapy (OR = 0.40 [0.18-0.91], p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Local recurrence rates were comparable between both groups; HDR brachytherapy seem to have a better toxicity profile. Our data confirmed the finding that HDR can be used to safely administer ISBT without increasing chronic toxicity.
