Does Breast Surgery Type Alter Incidental Axillary Irradiation? A Dosimetric Analysis of the "Sentinel Envahi et Randomisation du Curage" SERC Trial.

BACKGROUND: An incidental axillary dose of adjuvant radiotherapy using tangential beams is usually given after breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer. The goal of this sub-study was to evaluate this incidental dose in the setting of post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) according to two different radiotherapy techniques. METHODS: Patients participating in a randomized SERC trial who received PMRT in a single center were included. We collected the incidental axillary dose delivered to the Berg level 1 using different dosimetric parameters and compared two techniques using Student's t-test: three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) and volumetric arc therapy (VMAT). RESULTS: We analyzed radiotherapy plans from 52 patients who received PMRT from 2012 to 2021. The mean dose delivered to the Berg level 1 was 37.2 Gy. It was significantly higher with VMAT than with 3D-CRT-43.6 Gy (SD = 3.1 Gy) versus 34.8 Gy (SD = 8.6 Gy) p < 0.001. Eighty-four percent of the Berg level 1 was covered by 40 Gy isodose in the VMAT group versus 55.5% in the 3D-CRT group p < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: On the Berg level 1, PMRT gives a dose at least equivalent to the one given by post-breast-conserving surgery radiotherapy, making it possible to limit completion axillary lymph node dissections in select pN1a patients treated with a mastectomy. Modern radiotherapy techniques like VMAT tend to increase this incidental dose.

A novel lung SBRT treatment planning: Inverse VMAT plan with leaf motion limitation to ensure the irradiation reproducibility of a moving target.

This study exposed the implementation of a novel technique (VMATLSL) for the planning of moving targets in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). This new technique has been compared to static conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and dynamic conformal arc (DCA). The rationale of this study was to lower geometric complexity (54.9% lower than full VMAT) and hence ensure the reproducibility of the treatment delivery by reducing the risk for interplay errors induced by respiratory motion. Dosimetry metrics were studied with a cohort of 30 patients. Our results showed that leaf speed limitation provided conformal number (CN) close to the VMAT (median CN of VMATLSL is 0.78 vs 0.82 for full VMAT) and were a significant improvement on 3D-CRT and DCA with segment-weight optimized (respectively 0.55 and 0.57). This novel technique is an alternative to VMAT or DCA for lung SBRT treatments, combining independence from the patient's breathing pattern, from the size and amplitude of the lesion, free from interplay effect and with dosimetry metrics close to the best that could be achieve with full VMAT.

Dosimetric comparison of VMAT standard optimization (SO) and multi-criteria optimization (MCO) treatment plans with standard mode delivery (STD) or sliding window (SW) for head and neck cancer.

PURPOSE: A new development on the RayStation treatment planning system (TPS) allows a plan to be planned by imposing a constraint on the leaf sequencing: all leaves move in the same direction before moving again in the opposite direction to create a succession of sliding windows (SWs). The study aims to investigate this new leaf sequencing, coupled with standard optimization (SO) and multi-criteria optimization (MCO) and to compare it with the standard sequencing (STD). METHODS: Sixty plans were replanned for 10 head and neck cancer patients (two dose levels simultaneously SIB, 56 and 70 Gy in 35 fractions). All plans were compared, and a Wilcoxon signed-rank test was performed. Pre-processing QA and metrics of multileaf collimator (MLC) complexity were studied. RESULTS: All methodologies met the dose requirements for the planning target volumes (PTVs) and organs at risk (OARs). SO demonstrates significantly best results for homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), and target coverage (TC). SO-SW gives best results for PTVs (D98% and D2% ) but the differences between techniques are less than 1%. Only the D2%,PTV-56 Gy is higher with both MCO methods. MCO-STD offer the best sparing OARs (parotids, spinal cord, larynx, oral cavity). The gamma passing rates (GPRs) with 3%/3 mm criteria between the measured and calculated dose distributions are higher than 95%, slightly lowest with SW. The number of monitor units (MUs) and MLC metrics are higher in SW show a higher modulation. CONCLUSIONS: All plans are feasible for the treatment. A clear advantage of SO-SW is that the treatment plan is more straightforward to planning by the user due to the more advanced modulation. MCO stands out for its ease of use and will allow a less experienced user to offer a better plan than in SO. In addition, MCO-STD will reduce the dose to the OARs while maintaining good TC.

Is MRI-Linac helpful in SABR treatments for liver cancer?

Objective: To determine the MRI-Linac added value over conventional image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) in liver tumors Stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR). Materials and methods: We retrospectively compared the Planning Target Volumes (PTVs), the spared healthy liver parenchyma volumes, the Treatment Planning System (TPS) and machine performances, and the patients' outcomes when using either a conventional accelerator (Versa HD®, Elekta, Utrecht, NL) with Cone Beam CT as the IGRT tool or an MR-Linac system (MRIdian®, ViewRay, CA). Results: From November 2014 to February 2020, 59 patients received a SABR treatment (45 and 19 patients in the Linac and MR-Linac group, respectively) for 64 primary or secondary liver tumors. The mean tumor size was superior in the MR-Linac group (37,91cc vs. 20.86cc). PTV margins led to a median 74%- and 60% increase in target volume in Linac-based and MRI-Linac-based treatments, respectively. Liver tumor boundaries were visible in 0% and 72% of the cases when using CBCT and MRI as IGRT tools, respectively. The mean prescribed dose was similar in the two patient groups. Local tumor control was 76.6%, whereas 23.4% of patients experienced local progression (24.4% and 21.1% of patients treated on the conventional Linac and the MRIdian system, respectively). SABR was well tolerated in both groups, and margins reduction and the use of gating prevented ulcerous disease occurrence. Conclusion: The use of MRI as IGRT allows for the reduction of the amount of healthy liver parenchyma irradiated without any decrease of the tumor control rate, which would be helpful for dose escalation or subsequent liver tumor irradiation if needed.

Synthetic computed tomography generation for abdominal adaptive radiotherapy using low-field magnetic resonance imaging.

Background and Purpose: Magnetic Resonance guided Radiotherapy (MRgRT) still needs the acquisition of Computed Tomography (CT) images and co-registration between CT and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). The generation of synthetic CT (sCT) images from the MR data can overcome this limitation. In this study we aim to propose a Deep Learning (DL) based approach for sCT image generation for abdominal Radiotherapy using low field MR images. Materials and methods: CT and MR images were collected from 76 patients treated on abdominal sites. U-Net and conditional Generative Adversarial Network (cGAN) architectures were used to generate sCT images. Additionally, sCT images composed of only six bulk densities were generated with the aim of having a Simplified sCT.Radiotherapy plans calculated using the generated images were compared to the original plan in terms of gamma pass rate and Dose Volume Histogram (DVH) parameters. Results: sCT images were generated in 2 s and 2.5 s with U-Net and cGAN architectures respectively.Gamma pass rates for 2%/2mm and 3%/3mm criteria were 91% and 95% respectively. Dose differences within 1% for DVH parameters on the target volume and organs at risk were obtained. Conclusion: U-Net and cGAN architectures are able to generate abdominal sCT images fast and accurately from low field MRI.

Adaptive Magnetic Resonance-Guided External Beam Radiation Therapy for Consolidation in Recurrent Cervical Cancer.

Purpose: Adaptive magnetic resonance (MR)-guided brachytherapy takes an important place as consolidation within the care of cervical malignancies, but may be impracticable in some unusual cases. This work aimed to present the case of adaptive MR-guided external beam radiation therapy (aMRgRT) used as a boost in a recurrence of cervical cancer. Methods and Materials: We report on a case of a parametrial recurrence in a 31-year-old patient who already underwent a trachelectomy as treatment for her primary growth. After concomitant radio-chemotherapy, a brachytherapy boost was performed. Because of its position in relation to the left uterine artery after trachelectomy, impeding interstitial catheters set up, the relapse was insufficiently covered. With the aim to refine the coverage of target volumes, aMRgRT treatment was undertaken to allow for achievement of the dosimetric goals. Results: In clinical circumstances where the brachytherapy step was hindered, aMRgRT presents many advantages. First, daily native MR-imaging outperforms usual x-ray imaging in the pelvis, refining repositioning. Second, its specific workflow allows for the performance of adaptive treatment, with consideration of both the inter- and intrafraction motions of organs at risk and target volumes. Conclusion: In nonfeasible brachytherapy situations, aMRgRT could be a satisfying substitute. Nevertheless, brachytherapy remains the standard of care as a boost in locally advanced cervical cancer.

[Start of activity with the MRIdian® system: The first 200 patients treated at the Institut Paoli-Calmettes]. / Retour d'expérience clinique à propos des 200 premiers patients traités au MRIdian® à l'Institut Paoli-Calmettes.

INTRODUCTION: Several centers have recently been equipped with MRI-guided radiotherapy systems, including the Paoli-Calmettes Institute which was the first French center to start this activity. We report in this article our early experience. METHODS: Data related to patients treated on the MRIdian® (Viewray®) were prospectively collected. Procedures concerning the implementation of the system and internal organizational issues were summarized. RESULTS: Between February 2019 and March 2020, 201 patients were treated: 40% of treatments were normofractionated (n=70) and 60% used hypofractionation (n=105). The reported monthly occupancy rate at one, six and twelve months was 30%, 62%, and 90%. The distribution of normofractionated treatments was dominated by prostatic (29%) and pancreatic (26%) cancers, followed by abdomino-pelvic irradiations for gynecological cancers (12%) or lymph node diseases (12%) and boosts for rectal or vaginal cancers (11%). Regarding treatments with moderate hypofractionation (dose by fraction between 3 and 5Gy), they corresponded mainly to integrated boost for abdomino-pelvic lymph nodes (38%), while the stereotaxic treatments primarily concerned hepatic lesions (15%), bones (30%). DISCUSSION: The MRIdian® was initially used widely in our service corresponding to a learning curve for MRI guidance. This new tool for image-guided radiotherapy helped us to secure our practice providing solutions for both inter and intra-fraction movements making it possible to reduce the additional margin in order to better protect the organs at risk. The main technical difference with conventional accelerators is the possibility of performing adaptive radiotherapy in real time, the start of which was more gradual.

The impact of modern preoperative high-dose-rate brachytherapy in early-stage cervical cancer.

PURPOSE: To analyze the clinical outcomes and the safety of preoperative high-dose-rate (HDR) image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) followed by minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in the multidisciplinary management of early-stage cervical cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Medical records of all consecutive patients with early-stage cervical cancer treated at our institution between 2012 and 2018 with preoperative IGABT in a multidisciplinary approach were reviewed. Treatment schedule was pelvic node dissection, preoperative IGABT followed 6-8 week later by MIS hysterectomy. RESULTS: Seventy patients with cervical cancer FIGO stages (IB1 18.6%, IB2 75.7% and IIA1 5.7%) were treated by preoperative HDR brachytherapy. With a median follow-up of 37.4 months [95% confidence interval, 32.1-39.7 months] isolated vaginal vault recurrence was not observed, 3 pelvic relapses were reported (4.3%). None of patients received postoperative radiotherapy (EBRT) or radiochemotherapy. The estimated 3-year local and pelvis relapse free survival for the entire population were respectively 98% [95% confidence interval, 89%-100%] and 90% [80%-96%]. The estimated 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) for the entire population was 88% [77-94%]. The 3-year overall survival (OS) rate was 97% [88%-99%]. Microscopic vaginal resection margin (R1) was observed in one patient ([1].4%). Lymph-vascular space invasion (LVSI) was found found in 6 (8.6%) patients. Forty-eight late complications in 36 patients (51.4%) were observed. Five (7.1%) grade 3 vaginal wound dehiscence toxicities were observed. Urinary and gastrointestinal toxicities were grade 1-2. No grade 4-5 complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative image-guided adaptive brachytherapy followed by minimally invasive surgery allows high local control, reduces positive surgical margins and rates of lymph-vascular space invasion avoiding adjuvants treatments. Surgical approaches must be discussed with patients including preoperative brachytherapy as a down-staging treatment.

Lessons from radiochemotherapy and modern image-guided adaptive brachytherapy followed by hysterectomy.

PURPOSE: To analyze the clinical outcomes and the safety of radiochemotherapy (RCT) and image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) and to evaluate the impact of hysterectomy (HT) as completion of treatment for cervical cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: 145 patients with locally advanced cervical cancer were treated at our institution. Patients underwent RCT and IGABT, then hysterectomy (HT) as completion of treatment was performed, with the exception of patients with surgical contraindications, para aortic metastatic disease or patients who refused surgery. Clinical outcomes and morbidity were retrospectively reviewed in both groups. Local relapse free survival (LRFS), pelvic relapse free survival (PRFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. RESULTS: Completion HT was performed in 90 (62.1%) patients. Complete histological response and microscopic disease were found in 77 patients (85.6%). Local relapse was observed in 14 patients (9.6%) without differences between completion HT group and the definitive RCT and IGABT group (Odds Ratio OR = 1.73 [0.57-5.23], p = 0.33). The estimated 3-year LRFS and PRFS for the entire population were respectively 90% [84%-94%] and 93% [87%-96%], with no significant differences between them (respectively Hazard Ratio HR = 0.57 [0.20-1.64], p = 0.30 and HR = 0.37 [0.10-1.31], p = 0.12). The estimated 3-year OS rate for the whole population was 84% [75%-91%] with no significant differences between groups (HR = 0.81 [0.32-2.06], p = 0.65). Regarding morbidity, grade ≥ 2 vaginal toxicity was more frequent in the definitive RCT and IGABT group (43.6% vs 26.7%, p = 0.04). All grade 4 toxicity events were reported in the completion HT group. CONCLUSIONS: Due to high severe toxicity, RCT and IGABT with dose escalation followed by completion hysterectomy don't seem compatible. No benefit and increased severe late morbidity were observed. Combined intracavitary/interstitial technique is mandatory in large target volume at brachytherapy.

Multivariate normal tissue complication probability modeling of vaginal late toxicity after brachytherapy for cervical cancer.

PURPOSE: To explore the best variables combination for a predictive model of vaginal toxicity in cervical cancer patients undergoing brachytherapy (BT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Clinical and 3-dimensional dosimetric parameters were retrospectively extracted from an institutional database of consecutive patients undergoing intracavitary BT after external beam radiation therapy from 2006 to 2013 for a cervical cancer. A least absolute shrinkage and selection operator selection procedure in Cox's proportional hazards regression model was performed to select a set of relevant predictors for a multivariate normal tissue complication probability model of Grade ≥2 vaginal late toxicity. Outcomes reliability was internally assessed by bootstrap resampling method. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-nine women were included in the present study with a median followup time of 3.8 years (interquartile range [IQR], 1.9-5.6 years). The 2 years and 5 years cumulative incidence rates of Grade ≥2 late vaginal toxicity were 19.9% and 27.5%, respectively. Among 31 metrics and six clinical factors extracted, the optimal model included two dosimetric variables: V70Gy and D5% (the percentage volume that received a dose greater or equal to 70 Gy and the minimum dose given to the hottest 5% volume, respectively). Area under the ROC curve at 2 and 5 years of followup were 0.85 and 0.91, respectively. Regarding internal validation, median area under the ROC curve of bootstrap predictions was 0.83 (IQR, 0.78-0.88) and 0.89 (IQR, 0.85-0.93) at 2 and 5 years of followup, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A multivariate normal tissue complication probability model for severe vaginal toxicity based on two dosimetric variables (V70Gy and D5%) provides reliable discrimination capability in a cohort of cervical cancer treated with external beam radiation therapy and BT.

Safety and benefit of using a virtual bolus during treatment planning for breast cancer treated with arc therapy.

PURPOSE: This study evaluates the benefit of a virtual bolus method for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan optimization to compensate breast modifications that may occur during breast treatment. METHODS: Ten files were replanned with VMAT giving 50 Gy to the breast and 47 Gy to the nodes within 25 fractions. The planning process used a virtual bolus for the first optimization, then the monitors units were reoptimized without bolus, after fixing the segments shapes. Structures and treatment planning were exported on a second scanner (CT) performed during treatment as a consequence to modifications in patient's anatomy. The comparative end-point was clinical target volume's coverage. The first analysis compared the VMAT plans made using the virtual bolus method (VB-VMAT) to the plans without using it (NoVB-VMAT) on the first simulation CT. Then, the same analysis was performed on the second CT. Finally, the level of degradation of target volume coverage between the two CT using VB-VMAT was compared to results using a standard technique of forward-planned multisegment technique (Tan-IMRT). RESULTS: Using a virtual bolus for VMAT does not degrade dosimetric results on the first CT. No significant result in favor of the NoVB-VMAT plans was noted. The VB-VMAT method led to significant better dose distribution on a second CT with modified anatomies compared to NoVB-VMAT. The clinical target volume's coverage by 95% (V95%) of the prescribed dose was 98.9% [96.1-99.6] on the second CT for VB-VMAT compared to 92.6% [85.2-97.7] for NoVB-VMAT (P = 0.0002). The degradation of the target volume coverage for VB-VMAT is not worse than for Tan-IMRT: the median differential of V95% between the two CT was 0.9% for VMAT and 0.7% for Tan-IMRT (P = 1). CONCLUSION: This study confirms the safety and benefit of using a virtual bolus during the VMAT planning process to compensate potential breast shape modifications.

Volumetric-modulated arc therapy for left-sided breast cancer and all regional nodes improves target volumes coverage and reduces treatment time and doses to the heart and left coronary artery, compared with a field-in-field technique.

We compared two intensity-modulated radiotherapy techniques for left-sided breast treatment, involving lymph node irradiation including the internal mammary chain. Inverse planned arc-therapy (VMAT) was compared with a forward-planned multi-segment technique with a mono-isocenter (MONOISO). Ten files were planned per technique, delivering a 50-Gy dose to the breast and 46.95 Gy to nodes, within 25 fractions. Comparative endpoints were planning target volume (PTV) coverage, dose to surrounding structures, and treatment delivery time. PTV coverage, homogeneity and conformality were better for two arc VMAT plans; V95%(PTV-T) was 96% for VMAT vs 89.2% for MONOISO. Homogeneity index (HI)(PTV-T) was 0.1 and HI(PTV-N) was 0.1 for VMAT vs 0.6 and 0.5 for MONOISO. Treatment delivery time was reduced by a factor of two using VMAT relative to MONOISO (84 s vs 180 s). High doses to organs at risk were reduced (V30(left lung) = 14% using VMAT vs 24.4% with MONOISO; dose to 2% of the volume (D2%)(heart) = 26.1 Gy vs 32 Gy), especially to the left coronary artery (LCA) (D2%(LCA) = 34.4 Gy vs 40.3 Gy). However, VMAT delivered low doses to a larger volume, including contralateral organs (mean dose [Dmean](right lung) = 4 Gy and Dmean(right breast) = 3.2 Gy). These were better protected using MONOISO plans (Dmean(right lung) = 0.8 Gy and Dmean(right breast) = 0.4 Gy). VMAT improved PTV coverage and dose homogeneity, but clinical benefits remain unclear. Decreased dose exposure to the LCA may be clinically relevant. VMAT could be used for complex treatments that are difficult with conventional techniques. Patient age should be considered because of uncertainties concerning secondary malignancies.

[The cost of intensity modulated radiation therapy in head and neck cancers: results of the 2002 STIC study]. / Le coût de la radiothérapie conformationnelle avec modulation d'intensité dans les cancers ORL: l'étude STIC 2002.

An economic evaluation of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in head and neck cancer was carried out to assess the cost of treatment and compare it to reimbursement paid to hospitals in the French Prospective Payment System. Planning required in average 20 hours of work for the physician and 6 hours for the radiation oncologist. Radiation consisted of 33 fractions in average and required 29 hours of work for the radiotherapy technician, 8 hours for the physician and 3 hours for the radiation oncologist. Mean cost of IMRT treatment was estimated at euro 10,916 (euro 2,773 for planning and euro 8,143 for radiation). The variability of costs was important and was in a large extent attributable to learning effects. As more patients were treated, unit cost of treatment was decreasing. In the French Prospective Payment System, mean reimbursement of IMRT was euro 6,987. For 70 % of the patients, reimbursement did not offset the cost of treatment. A financial support for hospitals implementing the technique is essential during the whole learning period.