Oral mucosal complications in orthodontic treatment.

BACKGROUND: Orthodontic therapy is used to solve numerous oral problems, but the use of fixed oral devices can also impact negatively the oral cavity, if the treatment is not steadily under control. The aim of this study is to evaluate tooth, bone and soft tissues lesions due to the presence of fixed orthodontic appliances. METHODS: One hundred patients with fixed orthodontic appliances were included in the study. In particular, 20 patients with rapid palatal expander (RPE), 20 patients with Forsus appliance, 20 patients with a fixed multibracket appliance treatment, 20 patients with just the lower vestibular multibracket treatment and 20 patients with both upper and lower vestibular multibracket treatment. An accurate oral examination of the oral cavity, comprehending teeth, bone and soft tissues, was carried out thoroughly, in order to find possible lesions caused by the fixed orthodontic treatment. RESULTS: Concerning RPE, 35% patients had reversible palatal lesions, while 45% patients had the impression of the appliance on the tongue. Periodontal damages were observed in 5% of the patients, as well as tooth lesions (i.e. dental caries). 20% of the patients with Forsus appliance experienced the lesion on the cheek mucosa, while 10% individuals reported periodontal problems, and 15% of the subject suffered for WSL (white spot lesion) and dental caries. Upper vestibular multibracket appliance caused superior labial lesions (15%), cheek mucosal lesions (20%), gingivitis (55%), white spot lesions (WSL) of superior teeth (15%), while dental recessions and periodontitis due to the appliance were rarely observed (5%). Lower vestibular multibracket appliance was frequently the cause of inferior labial lesions (15%), cheek mucosal lesions (15%), gingivitis (50%), WSL of inferior teeth (20%) and also in lower arch dental recessions and periodontitis due to the appliance were rarely observed (5%). Patients with both superior and inferior multibracket appliance experienced upper and/or lower lip lesions (25%), lesions of cheek mucosa (25%), gingivitis (65%) and WSL (30%), and just in few cases periodontitis (10%). Data shows a more critical oral situation in patients with both superior and inferior appliances than people with one-arch therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Orthodontic therapy offers a considerable number of advantages, but it is important to underline what may be the adverse consequences also. This allows the orthodontist to inform the patient of all the possible effects of their therapeutic choice. In most cases, RPE can cause an impression of the device on the tongue and reversible lesions of the palate. On the other hand, the orthodontic fixed therapy can cause gingivitis, followed by mucosal lesions, labial lesions and WSL. For these reasons, an accurate assessment of the patients before the application of fixed orthodontic treatment is necessary. Oral hygiene instructions and motivation are very important, as well as periodic controls of the fixed oral device.

Oxidative Stress Evaluation in Patients Treated with Orthodontic Self-ligating Multibracket Appliances: An in Vivo Case-Control Study.

OBJECTIVE: Oxidative stress is a pathologic event induced by a prevalence of oxidant agents on the antioxidant ones, with a consequent alteration of oxide-reducing balance. INTRODUCTION: Freeradicals produce damages both in cellular and extra-cellular components; phospholipid membranes, proteins, mitochondrial and nuclear DNA, are the target of the oxidative stress, that can finally cause cellular death due to apoptosis. MATERIALS & METHODS: Orthodontic appliances such as brackets, wires, resins and soldering have some components that can be considered as potential allergen, carcinogenic, cytotoxic and gene mutation factors. The primary aim of this research is to evaluate oxidative stress in the saliva of patients treated with multibracket self-ligating vestibular orthodontic appliances; the secondary purpose is to investigate the influence of orthodontic multibracket therapy on oral hygiene and the consequent effect on oxidative stress. Salivary specimens has been collected in a sample of 23 patients were enrolled (12 Female, 11 Male) between 12 and 16 years of age (mean age 14.2). For each patient has been collected a salivary specimen at the following time points; before orthodontic bonding (T1), five weeks (T2) and ten weeks (T3) after orthodontic appliance bonding. RESULTS: Samples has been analysed with a photometer due to SAT Test (Salivary Antioxidant Test). Data obtained show a mean of 2971 mEq/l of anti-oxidant agents before orthodontic treatment, and after five weeks from the bonding the mean was decreased to 2909 mEq/l, instead at ten weeks was increased to 3332 mEq/l. Repeated measures ANOVA did not reveal statistically significant differences between the time points (P = 0.1697). The study did not reveal any correlation between the level of dental hygiene and that of oxidative stress (Pearson Correlation Coefficient R = 0). CONCLUSION: Orthodontic treatment with multibrackets vestibular metallic appliance seems to be not able to affect oxidative stress during the first ten weeks of therapy.