Large-scale pathway specific polygenic risk and transcriptomic community network analysis identifies novel functional pathways in Parkinson disease.

Polygenic inheritance plays a central role in Parkinson disease (PD). A priority in elucidating PD etiology lies in defining the biological basis of genetic risk. Unraveling how risk leads to disruption will yield disease-modifying therapeutic targets that may be effective. Here, we utilized a high-throughput and hypothesis-free approach to determine biological processes underlying PD using the largest currently available cohorts of genetic and gene expression data from International Parkinson's Disease Genetics Consortium (IPDGC) and the Accelerating Medicines Partnership-Parkinson's disease initiative (AMP-PD), among other sources. We applied large-scale gene-set specific polygenic risk score (PRS) analyses to assess the role of common variation on PD risk focusing on publicly annotated gene sets representative of curated pathways. We nominated specific molecular sub-processes underlying protein misfolding and aggregation, post-translational protein modification, immune response, membrane and intracellular trafficking, lipid and vitamin metabolism, synaptic transmission, endosomal-lysosomal dysfunction, chromatin remodeling and apoptosis mediated by caspases among the main contributors to PD etiology. We assessed the impact of rare variation on PD risk in an independent cohort of whole-genome sequencing data and found evidence for a burden of rare damaging alleles in a range of processes, including neuronal transmission-related pathways and immune response. We explored enrichment linked to expression cell specificity patterns using single-cell gene expression data and demonstrated a significant risk pattern for dopaminergic neurons, serotonergic neurons, hypothalamic GABAergic neurons, and neural progenitors. Subsequently, we created a novel way of building de novo pathways by constructing a network expression community map using transcriptomic data derived from the blood of PD patients, which revealed functional enrichment in inflammatory signaling pathways, cell death machinery related processes, and dysregulation of mitochondrial homeostasis. Our analyses highlight several specific promising pathways and genes for functional prioritization and provide a cellular context in which such work should be done.

Renoprotective differences between perindopril and enalapril in the diabetic hypertensive rat do not reflect glomerular angiotensin-converting enzyme activity.

1. The various angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors have structural differences which affect their affinities for the catalytic sites on converting enzyme. We postulated that such differences might result in differences in renoprotective efficacy. We investigated this in the diabetic spontaneous hypertensive rat. We also investigated whether these differences might reflect variations in glomerular or plasma angiotensin-converting enzyme activity. 2. One week after induction of diabetes, rats were started on antihypertensive therapy: enalapril, 10 mg.day-1.kg-1, or perindopril, 4 mg.day-1.kg-1, in the drinking water. After 3 months, the rats were killed, blood samples were taken and tissues were harvested. Angiotensin-converting enzyme activity in isolated glomeruli and plasma was measured by fluorimetric assay. Glomerular protein content was also determined. 3. Urinary protein excretion was significantly lower in perindopril-treated rats than in either controls (P < 0.0005) or enalapril-treated rats (P < 0.05). Glomerular protein content was also lower in perindopril-treated rats (P < 0.05 versus enalapril; P < 0.005 versus control). There was no difference in glomerular angiotensin-converting enzyme activity between the two inhibitors although both were lower than control values (enalapril P < 0.025; perindopril P < 0.025). Plasma angiotensin-converting enzyme activity was significantly lower in the perindopril group than in either control (P < 0.005) or the enalapril group (P < 0.01). 4. We conclude that in the spontaneous hypertensive rat with streptozotocin-induced diabetes, perindopril is more effective than enalapril in reducing proteinuria and glomerular protein accumulation. This difference does not result from differences in glomerular-converting enzyme activity.

Acute but not chronic angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition induces enzyme synthesis in the glomerulus of the spontaneously hypertensive rat.

1. Treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors slows the rate of progression of nephropathy in the spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR) with streptozotocin-induced diabetes. Paradoxically, however, chronic ACE inhibitor therapy has been reported to be associated with induction of ACE in the plasma. We sought to determine whether induction also occurred in the glomerulus. 2. Seven days after induction of diabetes rats were randomized to receive perindopril (4 mg/kg per day) in the drinking water or water alone. Blood glucoses were maintained 6-10 mmol/L by daily ultralente insulin. Rats were killed after 1 and 12 weeks of ACE inhibitor therapy and the kidneys were harvested. Angiotensin-converting enzyme activity was determined in isolated glomeruli before and after removal of perindopril and reconstitution with zinc sulphate. 3. After 1 week of ACE inhibitor therapy, glomerular ACE was significantly greater after removal of perindopril than either before its removal (P < 0.025) or in the untreated controls (P < 0.025). After 12 weeks of therapy, ACE activity was significantly lower in the perindopril-treated group than in the untreated controls (P < 0.025). There was no increase in ACE activity following removal of perindopril. 4. These studies suggest that short-term ACE inhibition is associated with induction of ACE in the glomerulus. However, there was no increase in ACE activity after removal of perindopril, suggesting that induction of synthesis of this enzyme in the glomerulus does not occur during chronic ACE inhibition.

Differential efficacy of perindopril and enalapril in experimental diabetic nephropathy.

1. Treatment with angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors ameliorates human and experimental diabetic nephropathy, possibly as a result of changes in angiotensin II (AngII) and/or bradykinin concentrations. However, ACE is an indiscriminate enzyme, which hydrolyses numerous vasoactive peptides at two catalytic sites that are thought to be substrate specific. AngI is cleaved at the C-terminal site, bradykinin at both the C- and N-terminal sites, while other substrates may be preferentially cleaved at the N-terminal site. Of the various ACE inhibitors, some (e.g. perindopril) bind preferentially to the C-terminal site while others (e.g. enalapril) bind to both. We compared the efficacy of perindopril and enalapril in the diabetic SHR to determine whether all the benefits of ACE inhibition derive from changes in the concentrations of C-terminal related substrates. 2. Diabetes was induced by tail vein injection of streptozotocin (60 mg/kg) in 14 week old SHR. Blood glucose was maintained at 4-8 mmol/L by daily ultralente insulin injection and rats were randomized to control, enalapril (10 mg/kg per day) or perindopril (4 mg/kg per day) groups. Blood pressure, creatinine clearance and urinary protein excretion were monitored for 3 months. 3. Blood pressure in both treatment groups was lower than in control (perindopril P < 0.0001; enalapril P < 0.0001). Levels were marginally higher in the perindopril group than the enalapril group, although this difference was significant only in the second month (P < 0.025). Creatinine clearance was significantly lower in the perindopril group (0.44 +/- 0.05 mL/min) than in either the control rats (0.85 +/- 0.11 mL/min; P < 0.001) or the enalapril-treated group (0.66 +/- 0.05 mL/min; P < 0.005). Proteinuria was also lower in this group (4.3 +/- 0.9 mg/24h) than in the enalapril-treated (11.3 +/- 5.8 mg/24h; P < 0.05) or control groups (32.1 +/- 4.5 mg/24h; P < 0.0005). 4. The difference in efficacy between perindopril and enalapril that we have observed suggests that the benefits of ACE inhibition derive from changes in the concentrations of peptides catalysed by the C-terminal rather than the N-terminal site.

The platelet angiotensin II receptor in type I diabetes: studies in patients with and without nephropathy.

Experimental studies demonstrate impaired regulation of the mesangial angiotensin II (AII) receptor in diabetes. This could contribute to the disturbance of glomerular blood flow and the development of diabetic nephropathy. The aim of this study was to determine whether a similar receptor abnormality occurs in patients with type I insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) and if so whether this is more prevalent in patients with micro- or macro-albuminuria. The platelet AII receptor was chosen because of its availability from the circulation and its comparable regulatory properties to tissue-based receptors. The interaction between plasma AII and its platelet receptor was examined in 45 patients with IDDM and 36 age- and sex-matched control subjects. Seven patients had clinical nephropathy and two had persistent micro-albuminuria. The duration of diabetes varied from 1 month to 42 years. There was a significant inverse correlation between plasma AII and the logarithm of receptor number in the control group (r = -0.555, P < 0.001). This relationship was not observed in the diabetic patients irrespective of the duration of disease or the presence of nephropathy. Receptor expression in patients without nephropathy showed no correlation with either duration of disease or the degree of glycaemic control. However, a significant relationship between AII receptor number and duration of diabetes was noted in the group with nephropathy (r = 0.723, P < 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Abnormality of the glomerular angiotensin II receptor in experimental diabetic nephropathy.

1. The combined effect of diabetes and hypertension on the plasma angiotensin II (AII)/glomerular AII receptor (AII-R) relationship in streptozotocin-induced diabetes was investigated as well as the effect of glycaemic control on this relationship. 2. Diabetes was induced in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) and Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats with streptozotocin 60 mg/kg and blood sugars maintained between 18-21 mmol/L (uncontrolled diabetes) and 4-8 mmol/L (controlled diabetes). Rats were killed on days 1 and 7. Angiotensin II receptor was estimated by saturation analysis and plasma AII by radio-immunoassay. 3. Angiotensin II receptors were significantly higher in non-diabetic SHR than WKY rats (708 +/- 62 and 388 +/- 36 fmol/mg protein, respectively, P = 0.0008). Plasma AII were comparable in both groups (47 +/- 2.7, 38 +/- 3.5 pg/mL, respectively) and a significant inverse relationship between AII/AII-R was observed (WKY P = 0.02 and SHR P = 0.004). 4. On day 7, plasma AII and AII-R levels in diabetic groups were comparable with those of their non-diabetic controls. Diabetic WKY rats maintained an inverse correlation between AII and AII-R (controlled P = 0.04 and uncontrolled P = 0.015), but this did not occur in the SHR. 5. Absence of receptor response to varying ligand concentrations in the diabetic SHR may contribute to the development of nephropathy. Glycaemic control does not appear to reverse this abnormality in the SHR, so that co-existent hypertension may have a more direct influence on renal function.