Taxane Induced Cystoid Macular Edema: Case Report and Integrated Pathogenic Theory.

PURPOSE: To report a case of a 73-year-old man who presented with decreased visual acuity due to bilateral macular edema after paclitaxel administration for prostate cancer. METHODS: The ophthalmic evaluation consisted of medical and ocular history, Best Corrected Visual Acuity, slit-lamp biomicroscopy and Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography / Fluorescein Angiography. RESULTS: Optical Coherence Tomography and Fluorescein Angiography revealed silent cystoid macular edema. After consulting with the oncologist, the cessation of paclitaxel therapy was decided. The patient presented a gradual but steady resumption of the retinal edema, with complete restoration of normal retinal morphology and function within two months. The pathogenesis of the silent Cystoid Macular Edema (CME) is still unclear. Based on our case and a critical review of the previous observations and published data, we propose that the underlying cause of Taxane induced CME is the functional failure of Aquaporin mediated water transport at the level of retinal Intermediate and Deep capillary plexuses, and at lesser extent at the level of the Retinal Pigment Epithelium. CONCLUSION: Taxane induced silent CME should be attributed to the action of Taxanes on the microtubule guided aquaporin vesicles transport to the cell membrane. In our case of Taxane induced silent CME, withdrawal of the taxane was enough for complete recovery, and no additional treatment was needed.

Prognostic significance of RACGAP1 mRNA expression in high-risk early breast cancer: a study in primary tumors of breast cancer patients participating in a randomized Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group trial.

PURPOSE: RACGAP1 is a Rac GTPase-activating protein involved in cell growth regulation, cell transformation and metastasis. The aim of the present study was to explore the prognostic and/or predictive significance of RACGAP1 mRNA expression on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in high-risk early breast cancer patients and compare it to that of Ki67 protein expression and to the Nottingham prognostic index (NPI). METHODS: A total of 595 high-risk breast cancer patients were treated in a two-arm trial evaluating postoperative dose-dense sequential chemotherapy with epirubicin followed by CMF with or without paclitaxel. RNA was extracted from 314 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded primary tumor tissue samples followed by one-step quantitative RT-PCR for assessing RACGAP1 mRNA expression. RESULTS: High RACGAP1 mRNA expression (above the median) was associated with poor DFS (log-rank, p = 0.002) and OS (p < 0.001). High histological grade, as well as high Ki67 protein expression, was more frequent in the high-expression group of RACGAP1. Results of the Cox multivariate regression analysis revealed that high RACGAP1 mRNA expression independently predicted poor overall survival (Wald's p = 0.008). High Ki67 protein expression was also an adverse prognostic factor for death (p = 0.016), while high NPI score values were not. CONCLUSIONS: High RACGAP1 mRNA expression, as assessed by qRT-PCR, was found to be of adverse prognostic significance in high-risk early breast cancer patients treated with dose-dense sequential chemotherapy. The utility of RACGAP1 mRNA expression in patient selection for treatment with aggressive chemotherapy regimens should be further explored and validated in larger cohorts.

The first case of Staphylococcus aureus ST398 causing bacteremia in an immunocompromised patient in Greece.

We describe a case of catheter-related bloodstream infection, in a patient with colon cancer, caused by a methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus strain, nontypeable by pulsed field gel electrophoresis of SmaI macrorestriction fragment analysis, belonging to ST398. The patient recovered after daptomycin therapy. This is the first report that documents the emergence of ST398 in Greece.

Prognostic significance of UBE2C mRNA expression in high-risk early breast cancer. A Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) Study.

BACKGROUND: The ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) plays a pivotal role in tumorigenesis. Components of the UPS have recently been implicated in breast cancer progression. In the present study, we sought to explore the prognostic and/or predictive significance of UBE2C messenger RNA (mRNA) expression on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in high-risk operable breast cancer patients. METHODS: Five hundred and ninety-five high-risk breast cancer patients were treated in a two-arm trial evaluating postoperative, dose-dense sequential chemotherapy with epirubicin followed by CMF (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil) with or without paclitaxel (Taxol). RNA was extracted from 313 formalin-fixed primary tumor tissue samples followed by one-step quantitative RT-PCR for assessment of mRNA expression of UBE2C. RESULTS: High UBE2C mRNA expression was associated with poor DFS (Wald's P = 0.003) and OS (Wald's P = 0.005). High tumor grade, as well as high Ki67 protein expression, was more frequent in the high-expression group of UBE2C. Results of the Cox multivariate regression analysis revealed that high UBE2C mRNA expression remained an independent adverse prognostic factor for relapse (P = 0.037) and death (P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: High UBE2C mRNA expression was found to be of adverse prognostic significance in high-risk breast cancer patients. These findings need to be validated in larger cohorts.

Paclitaxel and gemcitabine versus carboplatin and gemcitabine in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. A phase III study of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group.

BACKGROUND: This phase III study was designed to compare the combination paclitaxel (Taxol)-gemcitabine (PG) versus carboplatin-gemcitabine (CG) in patients with advanced inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer. METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive patients with performance status of zero or one were randomized to gemcitabine 1 gm/m(2) on days 1 and 8 plus either paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2) on day 1 (arm A) or carboplatin at an area under the concentration-time curve of 6 mg on day 1 (arm B) every 3 weeks. Primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included objective response (OR), time to progression and toxicity. RESULTS: A total of 512 patients were enrolled and 452 eligible (arm A, 225; arm B, 227) were analyzed. All characteristics were well balanced with the exception of vena cava obstruction symptoms and lymph node involvement. Median survival was 9.97 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 8.74-12.0] for group A and 10.49 (95% CI 9.04-11.94) for group B. There was no difference in the OS, 1-year survival, OR and TtP. However, statistically significant differences were seen in toxicity. CONCLUSION: The two regimens are equally active. Myelotoxicity is worse in the CG group whereas alopecia, myalgia and neurotoxicity worse in the PG group.

Multicenter phase-II trial of irinotecan plus oxaliplatin [IROX regimen] in patients with poor-prognosis cancer of unknown primary: a hellenic cooperative oncology group study.

BACKGROUND: Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) lacks established therapy although it affects 3% of cancer patients. We evaluated the irinotecan-oxaliplatin combination (IROX regimen) in previously untreated patients with non-favorable subsets of unknown primary carcinomas. METHODS: This was a multicenter phase-II trial. Protocol treatment consisted of oxaliplatin 80 mg/m(2) followed by irinotecan 160 mg/m(2) administered every 3 weeks. The primary end points were response rate and toxicity, and secondary end points were time to progression and survival. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients with liver, bone or multiple visceral metastases entered into the trial and received a median 6 chemotherapy cycles (1-11). The regimen was very well tolerated with one febrile neutropenia case and six cases with diarrhea grade 3 (16%). In intent-to-treat analysis the tumor response rate was 13% (95% CI = 4.8-25.7%) and 12 patients (27%, 95%CI 13.9-40.4%) had at least 4 months' duration of disease stabilization. The median time to progression was 2.7 months and the median survival was 9.5 months, with 40% of patients alive at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: The IROX regimen demonstrated similar efficacy and a favorable toxicity profile compared to other more toxic chemotherapy combinations in patients with poor-prognosis CUP.

Mitoxantrone plus vinorelbine in pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Vinorelbine and mitoxantrone have both been demonstrated to have significant antitumor activity in patients with breast cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination as second or third line treatment in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Fifty-one previously treated patients with MBC were enrolled from October 2001 to May 2004 and 48 were eligible for evaluation. Median age was 59 years (range 33-82) and ECOG performance status was < or =2. Distant sites of metastasis were as follows: liver 64%, bone 49%, lung 36%, lymph nodes 6%, skin 4%, brain 2% and other sites 6%. All patients received vinorelbine 20 mg/m(2), D1+8 and mitoxantrone 10 mg/m(2) D8 every 21 days for 6 cycles. All eligible patients were analyzed for toxicity and response. Two patients (4%) achieved complete response and 12 (25.5%) partial response. The objective overall response rate was 29.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 17 - 45), 9 (19%) patients had stable disease, 17 (36%) had progressive disease and 7 (15%) were non-evaluable. After a median follow up of 18 months, overall survival was 13 months (range 0.8 - 38+) and median time to disease progression was 5 months (range 1 - 32). A total of 280 cycles was delivered. The relative dose intensities of mitoxantrone and vinorelbine were 79% and 77%, respectively. Toxicities (grade III-IV) were as follows: leukopenia 18 (38%), neutropenia 21 (45%), thrombocytopenia 1 (2%), anemia 4 (8.5%), alopecia 2 (4%) and constipation 1 (2%). Febrile neutropenia was recorded in one patient. There were no treatment related deaths. The combination of mitoxantrone and vinorelbine is an effective regimen with manageable toxicity in pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer.

Phase II study of irinotecan plus leucovorin and bolus 5-fluorouracil as first- or second-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric or esophageal-gastric junction adenocarcinoma.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the activity and safety of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) and irinotecan as first- or second-line treatment in patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma. Treatment consisted of irinotecan 80 mg/m(2) intravenously (i.v.), followed by LV 200 mg/m(2) (i.v.) and 5-FU 450 mg/m(2) as an i.v. bolus, administered weekly for 6 weeks, followed by a 2-week rest period. Thirty-one patients (23 chemo-naïve, 8 chemo-exposed) were enrolled. The overall response rate was 22.6% and the disease control rate was 38.7%. Among the patients who received the regimen as first-line treatment, objective response rate was 30.4% and the disease control rate was 52.1%. However, progression of the disease was recorded in all the patients receiving the combination as second-line chemotherapy. The median time to disease progression (TTP) was 4 months and the median duration of survival was 7 months. The median TTP was 6 months for patients treated with first-line chemotherapy and 2.5 for those who received study treatment as second line. Furthermore, the median survival duration was 8 months and 6 months, respectively. The most frequent grade 3 toxicity was febrile neutropenia. Grade 3 non-hematological toxicities were rare. There were no treatment-related deaths. The combination of 5-FU/LV and irinotecan as first-line treatment was found to be well tolerated and effective in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Further investigation would be worthwhile, particularly in elderly or debilitated patients who cannot tolerate aggressive chemotherapy.

Efficacy of oxcarbazepine for prophylaxis against cumulative oxaliplatin-induced neuropathy.

We conducted a randomized, open-label, controlled trial to assess the efficacy of oxcarbazepine for prophylaxis against oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy (OxIN). Thirty-two patients with colon cancer received 12 courses of the FOLFOX-4 regimen and were randomly assigned to receive oxcarbazepine (600 mg BID) or chemotherapy without oxcarbazepine. The incidence of OxIN was strikingly decreased in patients receiving oxcarbazepine (31.2% vs 75%). Oxcarbazepine may prevent OxIN symptoms. Further larger placebo-controlled trials are warranted to confirm our results.

Paclitaxel and gemcitabine vs. paclitaxel and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in advanced non-nasopharyngeal head and neck cancer. An efficacy and cost analysis randomized study conducted by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of patients with recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck cancer (HNC) is poor. Median survival of these patients following chemotherapy is in the range of 6 to 9 months. In the present randomized phase III trial we compared two new combinations containing new drugs with proven activity in phase II studies with patients with HNC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From November 1999 until November 2004, 166 eligible patients with HNC were enrolled in the study. They were treated with paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) on day 1 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (group A, 85 patients) or with paclitaxel, as in group A, and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 40 mg/m(2) on day 1 every 4 weeks (group B, 81 patients). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in response rate (20% versus 29%, P = 0.21), time to disease progression (median; 4.4 months versus 6.0 months, P = 0.09) and survival (median; 8.6 months versus 11.05 months, P = 0.25). Both regimens were generally well tolerated. The most frequently reported side effect, apart from alopecia, was neutropenia. Overall, there was no significant difference in severe toxicity between the two treatment arms. CONCLUSIONS: The present study could not demonstrate a survival benefit with either regimen. Both treatments were well tolerated. Randomized studies comparing each of the two regimens with standard chemotherapy are warranted.

Mitoxantrone plus gemcitabine in pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Gemcitabine and mitoxantrone have both shown significant antitumor activity in patients with breast cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this combination as second or third-line treatment in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Forty-six previously treated patients with MBC were enrolled from June 2000 to November 2002. Mean age was 56 years and ECOG performance status was < or =2. All patients received mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2, D8 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2, D1+8 every 21 days for 6 cycles. There were no complete responders. Objective response was observed in 12 patients (26%), 15 (33%) patients had stable disease, 15 (33%) had progressive disease and 4 (9%) were non-evaluable. At median follow-up of 27.8 months, overall survival was 13.3 months (range 0.6-33.8+) and the median time to disease progression (TTP) was 4.4 months (range 0.2-33.8). Toxicities (grade 3-4) were as follows: leukopenia 18 (39%), neutropenia 19 (41%), thrombocytopenia 4 (8.5%), anemia 6 (13%) and alopecia 1 (2%). Febrile neutropenia was recorded in 2 (4%) patients. There were no treatment related deaths. The authors conclude that the combination of mitoxantrone and gemcitabine is an effective regimen in pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer. Toxicity was manageable.

Impact of providing booklets about chemotherapy to newly presenting patients with cancer: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: There has been limited research examining the efficacy of providing written information to cancer patients in southern and eastern European countries. This study investigated the impact of a booklet about chemotherapy on patient satisfaction, quality of life (QoL) and emotional distress, and assessed booklet use. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 145 Greek cancer outpatients prior to commencing chemotherapy completed a questionnaire and were randomized to receive (n = 72) or not receive (n = 73) the booklet. All patients completed the second questionnaire before the following cycle of chemotherapy. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the two groups. Experimental group patients reported being significantly more satisfied with the information received and care overall than those in the control group, felt significantly more and better informed, and perceived the information received as being clearer and detailed. The intervention produced no benefits in terms of anxiety, depression or QoL. The booklet was read by almost all patients and to a great extent by significant others. The majority considered the booklet useful to read and helpful in recalling chemotherapy-related information. CONCLUSIONS: The current results provide further evidence on the efficacy of information-giving interventions in societies where disclosure of information to cancer patients still remains controversial.

The impact of paclitaxel or cisplatin-based chemotherapy on sympathetic skin response: a prospective study.

The current study aimed to assess the viability of sympathetic sudomotor fibers in cancer patients treated with cisplatin or paclitaxel-based chemotherapy and to ascertain whether this method could contribute to the diagnostic sensitivity of conventional techniques. Sympathetic skin response (SSR) from the hand and sole of 23 cancer patients (nine females and 14 males, mean age 62.4 +/- 10.5 years) was recorded unilaterally before and after chemotherapy with six courses of cumulative cisplatin or paclitaxel containing regimens. Clinical and electrophysiological data were also collected and correlated with the SSR results. Twenty-three healthy subjects served as controls. SSR abnormalities were only present in patients with evidence of peripheral neuropathy assessed by conventional nerve conduction techniques. Three patients had absent SSR in the upper limb whilst six patients had absent SSR both in the upper and lower limbs. In the upper limb, the mean SSR latency was not significantly altered through time (P = 0.086). In the lower limb the mean delay from baseline to follow-up was significantly changed (P = 0.029). In patients, the mean SSR latency was significantly prolonged compared with controls in both upper limb (P = 0.001) and lower limb (P = 0.000). SSR abnormalities were strongly related to sensory conduction abnormalities as detected by conventional techniques (r = 0.39, P = 0.004). Our results showed that SSR does not seem to add to the diagnostic sensitivity of conventional techniques in chemotherapy-induced neuropathy. However, its role in the disclosure of small fibers neuropathy abnormalities is worth considering. Further studies are warranted to address this important issue.

Phase I study of etoposide, cisplatin and irinotecan triplet in patients with advanced-stage small-cell lung cancer.

AIM: The irinotecan-cisplatin combination has emerged as a new standard for the treatment of advanced-stage small-cell lung cancer (AS-SCLC). To move forward we developed a 3-day regimen of cisplatin, etoposide and irinotecan. METHODS: Successive cohorts of AS-SCLC patients were treated with irinotecan administered as a single 1-h infusion in combination with fixed doses of cisplatin (20 mg/m(2)) and etoposide (75 mg/m(2)), both given for three consecutive days (ECI regimen). Irinotecan dose was escalated from 60 mg/m(2) by 40-mg/m(2) increments. At mid-step between the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the previous dose level, patients were randomized for the day of administration of irinotecan (day 1 vs day 3). RESULTS: A total of 36 AS-SCLC patients received 166 courses of treatment at four dose levels. The MTD of irinotecan was 140 mg/m(2) (three dose-limiting toxicities, DLTs), and the recommended optimal dose (ROD) 120 mg/m(2) (two DLTs). DLTs were febrile neutropenia and grade 3 diarrhea. Other toxicities were mild. No difference in toxicity was seen between the two time schedules. A 77% (95% CI 63.25-90.75%) response rate was recorded among 31 evaluable patients and the median survival was 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: The ECI regimen was well tolerated and showed considerable activity in patients with AS-SCLC. Phase II/III evaluation is ongoing.

Treatment of non-small cell lung cancer with gefitinib ('Iressa', ZD1839): the Greek experience with a compassionate-use program.

This is a retrospective analysis of 150 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer who had failed prior treatment or were unfit for chemotherapy and were treated with oral gefitinib ('Iressa', ZD1839; AstraZeneca) 250 mg/day. Thirty-two patients who received gefitinib for 3 weeks or less were not included in the analysis. For the remaining 118 evaluable patients, the mean age was 63.1 years; most patients had received prior chemotherapy (97.5%), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status scores 0-2 (97.4%) and stage IV disease (64.4%). The majority were symptomatic (84.6%). Disease control was observed in 30 patients (25.4%), of whom five had a partial response and 25 had stable disease; 18 (15.3%) were not evaluable. Median duration of treatment was 29.9 weeks in responding patients and 11.5 in patients with progressive disease (p<0.0001). Median overall survival was 7.3 months (15.2 months for disease control) and median progression-free survival was 3.2 months. Gefitinib was well tolerated, with grade 3/4 skin rash and diarrhea seen in 2.5 and 4.2% of patients, respectively. Clinical benefit was evaluated using questionnaires before and following treatment with gefitinib. In 82 patients with completed questionnaires, evaluation revealed symptom improvement in 40.1% and improvement in general feeling in 31.4%. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) analysis found that efficacy did not correlate with tumor EGFR overexpression. Therefore, in this retrospective analysis, gefitinib treatment provided disease control in 25% of patients who derived significant palliative benefit.

Oxaliplatin-induced acute-onset thrombocytopenia, hemorrhage and hemolysis.

BACKGROUND: Oxaliplatin is a novel platinum derivative with established anti-tumor activity in colorectal cancer. Acute-onset hemolytic anemia and thrombocytopenia associated with this drug have rarely been reported and some of these cases have been severe or even fatal. CASE REPORT: This case report describes a patient who developed fever, chills, abdominal and back pain as well as sudden-onset severe thrombocytopenia, upper gastrointestinal bleeding and hemolysis immediately after treatment with oxaliplatin for metastatic colorectal cancer. The reaction appeared during the 14th cycle of chemotherapy. Corticosteroids and antihistamines were administered together with platelet transfusions. Over the next 2 days platelet count improved and the syndrome abated. The patient was discharged 4 days later. Furthermore, the reaction was accompanied by a strongly positive Coombs test and increased TNF-alpha and IL-10 serum levels which returned to normal following anti-inflammatory drug administration. CONCLUSION: Physicians should be aware of the possibility of acute hematological emergencies following oxaliplatin administration.

Vinorelbine and estramustine in androgen-independent metastatic prostate cancer: a phase II study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the safety and activity of vinorelbine in combination with estramustine in men with androgen-independent metastatic prostate cancer. METHODS: Twenty-five men with androgen-independent metastatic prostate cancer were treated with the combination of vinorelbine and estramustine. Vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) was administered by intravenous bolus on Days 1 and 8. Estramustine 140 mg was administered three times a day by mouth on Days 1 through 14. Treatment was repeated every 21 days. RESULTS: A total of 132 cycles of treatment were administered. The median number of cycles per patient was 5 (range: 1-16). Mild Grade 1 or 2 gastrointestinal toxicity and fatigue were the most common adverse effects. Hematologic toxicity was minimal. Treatment resulted in a sustained > 50% decrease in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in 6 of 25 patients (24% of patients; 95% confidence interval (CI) 9-45%). The median duration of PSA response was 10 weeks (range: 3-39 weeks). Of the five men with bidimensionally measurable disease, none achieved a complete or partial response. There were no documented improvements in post-treatment bone scans. Median overall survival time was 14.1 months. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of vinorelbine and estramustine is a well-tolerated and modestly active regimen in men with androgen-independent metastatic prostate cancer.

High-Dose Therapy for Ovarian Carcinoma.

Epithelial ovarian carcinomas are successfully treated but seldom cured with standard platinum-based chemotherapy regimens. Investigation continues on the role of high-dose chemotherapy as part of salvage, consolidation and primary induction treatment strategies. Currently, the majority of available clinical studies suggest that modest increases in the dose of platinum in primary induction therapy does not translate into increased survival and comes at the cost of increased toxicity. Interest continues in the use of very high-dose chemotherapy regimens typically with peripheral blood stem cell or bone marrow transplantation. Several series have demonstrated that this approach can provide prolonged disease-free survival in a subset of carefully selected patients with low-volume chemotherapy-sensitive disease. The appropriate application of this expensive and potentially toxic treatment to women with ovarian cancer requires further clinical investigation.