Prosthetic lower extremity hemodialysis access grafts have satisfactory patency despite a high incidence of infection.

INTRODUCTION: Prosthetic arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) in the lower extremity represent a useful alternative for hemodialysis vascular access when all upper limb access sites have been used or in some patients when freedom of both hands is necessary during dialysis. Reported complications include an increased risk of infection and limb ischemia. This study evaluated our experience with the patency outcomes and complication rates of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) AVGs placed in the thigh. METHODS: A retrospective outcomes analysis was performed of all femoral AVGs inserted between January 1992 and July 2007. Data were obtained by review of medical records for patient demographics, comorbidities, and AVG-related outcomes. Patency, complication rates, and risk factors for infection were determined. RESULTS: A total of 153 prosthetic AVGs were placed in 127 patients (63 men). Mean patient age was 52.7 ± 16.3 years. Median follow-up was 25 months (range, 1-169 months). The most common underlying renal disease was glomerulonephritis in 27 (21%). Hypertension and coronary artery disease were common comorbidities, respectively, in 49 (39%) and 23 patients (18%). The primary and secondary AVG patency rates at 12 months were 53.9% and 75.3%, respectively, and 2- and 5-year patency rates were, respectively, 39.6% and 19.3% (primary) and 63.8% and 50.6% (secondary). The mean AVG survival for all cases was 31.6 months (range, 0-149 months). Surgical thrombectomy was required in 82 (54%), and 22 AVGs (14%) required surgical revision for stenosis. Infection occurred in 41 AVGs (27%), and limb ischemia occurred in 2 (1.3%). Statistical analysis did not reveal a significant risk factor for infection. CONCLUSIONS: Femoral AVGs are a suitable alternative to upper limb vascular access, with acceptable primary and secondary patency rates. Infection occurred in approximately one-quarter of cases, whereas steal was uncommon.

Is bilateral duplex scanning necessary in patients with symptoms of deep venous thrombosis?

BACKGROUND: Venous duplex ultrasound scanning (VDUS) has been shown to be an accurate non-invasive means to diagnose symptomatic deep venous thrombosis (DVT). The aim of our study was to determine whether bilateral VDUS is necessary in patients who present with symptoms of DVT. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the results of bilateral lower extremity VDUS performed on 1029 inpatients at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital in the 24 months from 1 January 1998 to 31 December 1999. RESULTS: Of the 1029 patients, 705 (69%) presented with unilateral symptoms and 324 (31%) with bilateral symptoms. The overall incidence of DVT was 168 (16% of 1029 patients). In 705 patients with unilateral symptoms the diagnosis of DVT was confirmed in 120 (17.0%), of whom 20 (16.7%) had unsuspected bilateral DVT. There were 12 patients (1.7% of the 705 patients) who had DVT in the asymptomatic limb, without DVT identified in the symptomatic limb. Overall there were 32 (5% of 705) patients with unilateral symptoms who had unsuspected DVT in the asymptomatic limb. Of the 20 patients with bilateral DVT, only one patient had more extensive DVT in the asymptomatic limb than in the symptomatic limb, that was therefore likely to alter treatment. Bilateral symptoms of DVT were present in 324 (31.5%) patients, 48 (14.8%) of whom were found to have DVT. Nineteen (39.6%) of these DVTs were bilateral. CONCLUSION: Overall the diagnostic yield of VDUS was low in this study, with an incidence of 16% of DVT detected in symptomatic patients. Techniques that improve the diagnostic yield of VDUS in symptomatic patients are required. A significant proportion (23%) of the DVT detected in this study were bilateral, and a small but significant proportion (10%) of DVT found in patients presenting with unilateral symptoms were only in the asymptomatic contralateral limb. Our study supports bilateral VDUS in symptomatic inpatients, as the detection of DVT in asymptomatic limbs aids future patient management if symptoms develop in the asymptomatic limb.