Depleting anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody cures new-onset diabetes, prevents recurrent autoimmune diabetes, and delays allograft rejection in nonobese diabetic mice.

BACKGROUND: The prevention of recurrent autoimmunity is a prerequisite for successful islet transplantation in patients with type I diabetes. Therapies effective in preserving pancreatic beta-cell mass in patients with newly diagnosed diabetes are good candidates for achieving this goal. Anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody (mAb) and antilymphocyte antisera are the only therapies to date that have cured early diabetic disease in the nonobese diabetic (NOD) mouse. We investigated whether other immunosuppressive therapies, including short-term depleting anti-CD4 mAb or costimulation blockade, would affect the disease progression in recently diabetic NOD mice. We also evaluated the effect of the anti-CD4 mAb on syngeneic and allogeneic graft survival in diabetic NOD recipients. METHODS AND RESULTS: We demonstrate that a short course of anti-CD4 mAb early after hyperglycemia onset cured diabetes. Normal islets and islets with CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell peri-insulitic infiltrate were found in the pancreata of cured NOD mice. A similar regimen prevented the recurrence of autoimmune diabetes in NOD/severe combined immunodeficient disease (SCID) islet isografts and delayed the rejection of allogeneic C57BL/6 islet allografts in diabetic female NOD mice. The co-transfer of diabetogenic splenocytes with splenocytes from anti-CD4 mAb-treated and cured NOD mice into 7-week-old, irradiated, NOD male mice was not able to protect from diabetes occurrence. This indicates that an anti-CD4-mediated cure of diabetes is independent of the induction of immunoregulatory T cells. Anti-CD154 mAb and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 immunoglobulin were ineffective in early-onset diabetes. CONCLUSION: Our results provide the first evidence that newly established autoimmune islet destruction in NOD mice responds to a short course of anti-CD4 mAb. In contrast, costimulation blockade is ineffective in this clinically relevant model.

Importance of hyperglycemia on the primary function of allogeneic islet transplants.

BACKGROUND: Hyperglycemia has been shown to influence primary function of islet isografts. In this study, we investigated the influence of hyperglycemia on primary function of allogeneic islets transplanted into spontaneously diabetic recipients (NOD) or streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice (BALB/c). METHODS: Mice with moderate, severe, or very severe hyperglycemia underwent transplantation with a marginal number of islets (350 into BALB/c mice and 700 into NOD mice). To prevent the alloimmune response, we used blockade of CD28:B7 and CD40L:CD40 costimulatory signaling pathways to determine the effect of hyperglycemia alone. Blood glucose levels of the mice were monitored after transplantation, and the grafts were assessed morphologically. RESULTS: Transplantation of allogeneic islets into moderately hyperglycemic BALB/c mice or severely diabetic NOD mice normalized the blood glucose levels in all mice within 3 days after transplantation, demonstrating the primary function of the graft. However, primary nonfunction was observed in all animals when islet transplantation was performed into severely diabetic BALB/c mice or very severely diabetic NOD mice. When mice were treated with costimulation blockade, reversal of diabetes was observed in severely diabetic BALB/c mice 15 days after transplantation, showing that the islets could adapt to the environment and function. However, transplantation of islets into NOD mice with very severe diabetes treated with costimulation blockade did not reverse diabetes, showing that even in the absence of alloimmune responses and given an adaptation period, the islets could not function. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that severe hyperglycemia impairs islet allograft function in BALB/c and NOD mice and that successful islet allotransplantation depends on the degree of hyperglycemia in the recipient.

Allorecognition and effector pathways of islet allograft rejection in normal versus nonobese diabetic mice.

Islet transplantation is becoming an accepted therapy to cure type I diabetes mellitus. The exact mechanisms of islet allograft rejection remain unclear, however. In vivo CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cell-depleting strategies and genetically altered mice that did not express MHC class I or class II antigens were used to study the allorecognition and effector pathways of islet allograft rejection in different strains of mice, including autoimmunity-prone nonobese diabetic (NOD) mice. In BALB/c mice, islet rejection depended on both CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells. In C57BL/6 mice, CD8(+) T cells could eventually mediate islet rejection by themselves, but they produced rejection more efficiently with help from CD4(+) T cells stimulated through either the direct or indirect pathway. In C57BL/6 mice, CD4(+) T cells alone caused islet rejection when only the direct pathway was available but not when only the indirect pathway was available. In contrast, in NOD mice, CD4(+) T cells alone, with only the indirect pathway, could mediate islet and cardiac allograft rejection. These findings indicate that different mouse strains can make use of different pathways for T cell-mediated rejection of islet allografts. In addition, they demonstrate that NOD mice, which develop autoimmunity and are known to be resistant to tolerance induction, have an unusually powerful CD4(+) cell indirect mechanism that can cause rejection of both islet and cardiac allografts. These data shed light on the mechanisms of islet allograft rejection in different responder strains, including those with autoimmunity.

The role of autoimmunity in islet allograft destruction: major histocompatibility complex class II matching is necessary for autoimmune destruction of allogeneic islet transplants after T-cell costimulatory blockade.

Although it has often been assumed that transplanted allogeneic islets can be destroyed by recurrent autoimmunity in recipients with type 1 diabetes, definitive evidence is lacking and the settings in which this may occur have not been defined. To address these issues, we compared the survival of islet transplants (subject to tissue-specific autoimmunity) with cardiac transplants (not subject to tissue-specific autoimmunity) from various major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-matched and -mismatched donors transplanted into autoimmune NOD recipients. We found that when recipients were treated with combined B7 and CD154 T-cell costimulatory blockade, hearts survived best with better MHC matching, whereas islets survived worst when the donor and recipient shared MHC class II antigens. In the absence of full or MHC class II matching, there was no difference in the survival of islet and cardiac allografts. We also found that the tendency of NOD mice to resist tolerance induction by costimulation blockade is mediated by both CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells, not directly linked to the presence of autoimmunity, and conferred by non-MHC background genes. These findings have clinical importance because they suggest that under some circumstances, avoiding MHC class II sharing may provide better islet allograft survival in recipients with autoimmune diabetes, since mismatched allogeneic islets may be resistant to recurrent autoimmunity. Our results may have implications for the design of future clinical trials in islet transplantation.

The role of CC chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) in islet allograft rejection.

Chemokines are important regulators in the development, differentiation, and anatomic location of leukocytes. CC chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) is expressed preferentially by CD4(+) T helper 1 (Th1) cells. We sought to determine the role of CCR5 in islet allograft rejection in a streptozotocin-induced diabetic mouse model. BALB/c islet allografts transplanted into CCR5(-/-) (C57BL/6) recipients survived significantly longer (mean survival time, 38 +/- 8 days) compared with those transplanted into wild-type control mice (10 +/- 2 days; P < 0.0001). Twenty percent of islet allografts in CCR5(-/-) animals without other treatment survived >90 days. In CCR5(-/-) mice, intragraft mRNA expression of interleukin-4 and -5 was increased, whereas that of interferon-gamma was decreased, corresponding to a Th2 pattern of T-cell activation in the target tissues compared with a Th1 pattern observed in controls. A similar Th2 response pattern was also observed in the periphery (splenocytes responding to donor cells) by enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assay. We conclude that CCR5 plays an important role in orchestrating the Th1 immune response leading to islet allograft rejection. Targeting this chemokine receptor, therefore, may provide a clinically useful strategy to prevent islet allograft rejection.