Feasibility of linac-based fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy and stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with up to ten brain metastases.

BACKGROUND: Linac-based fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (fSRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) are increasingly being used to manage patients with multiple metastases. This retrospective cohort study aimed to compare the outcomes after linac-based fSRT and SRS between three patient groups classified based on the number of brain metastases (BMs): 1 BM, 2-4 BM, 5-10 BM. METHODS: The data of consecutive patients with 1-10 BMs treated with fSRT or SRS between July 2016 and June 2018 at a single institution were collected. Patients with previous whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), concurrent use of WBRT, or surgical resection were excluded from the analysis. A total of 176 patients were classified into three groups according to the number of BMs: 78, 67, and 31 patients in 1 BM, 2-4 BM, and 5-10 BM, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS) curves, and the cumulative incidence with competing risks was used to estimate local control (LC), distant intracranial failure (DIF), and radiation necrosis (RN). RESULTS: Median OS was 19.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 10.2-27.5), 7.3 months (4.9-11.1), and 5.1 months (4.0-9.0) in 1 BM, 2-4 BM, and 5-10 BM, respectively. Compared to 2-4 BM, 1 BM had significantly better OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.59, 95% CI 0.40-0.87; p = 0.0075); however, 5-10 BM had comparable OS (HR 1.36, 95% CI 0.85-2.19; p = 0.199). There was no significant difference in LC, DIF, and RN between tumor number groups, but DIF was lower in 1 BM. RN of grade 2 or higher occurred in 21 patients (13.5%); grade 4 and 5 RN were not observed. CONCLUSIONS: The linac-based fSRT and SRS for patients with 5-10 BMs is comparable to that for patients with 2-4 BMs in OS, LC, DIF, and RN. It seems reasonable to use linac-based fSRT and SRS in patients with 5-10 BMs.

Clinical outcomes of 125I brachytherapy with and without external-beam radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: results from 300 patients at a single institution in Japan.

The aim of this study was to determine the outcomes and adverse events for 300 men with prostate cancer treated with 125iodine (125I) brachytherapy with and without external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) at a single institution in Japan. Between February 2005 and November 2011, 300 consecutive patients with clinically localized prostate cancer were treated with 125I brachytherapy at the Nagoya University Hospital. A total of 271 men were treated with implants with doses of 145 Gy, and 29 men were treated with implants with doses of 110 Gy combined with EBRT (40-50 Gy/20-25 fractions). The median patient age was 69 years (range, 53-83 years). The median follow-up period was 53 months (range, 5-99 months). According to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk classification, 132 men (44%) had low-risk, 147 men (29%) had intermediate-risk and 21 men (7%) had high-risk disease. The 5-year overall survival rate, biochemical relapse-free survival rate, and disease-specific survival rates were 93.5%, 97.3% and 98.5%, respectively. Two men (0.6%) died of prostate cancer and 10 men (3.3%) died of other causes. Seventeen men (5.6%) experienced Grade 2 rectal bleeding in all: 12 (41.4%) of 29 in brachytherapy with EBRT, and 5 (1.8%) of 271 in brachytherapy alone. The rates of Grade 2 and 3 genitourinary toxicity were 1.0% and 1.7%, respectively. Excellent local control was achieved at our hospital for localized prostate cancer with 125I brachytherapy with and without EBRT. Gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicities were acceptable.

Late Rectal Toxicity from Image-guided Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer.

AIM: Late rectal toxicity (LRT) was retrospectively evaluated in men with prostate cancer treated with image-guided intensity modulated radiotherapy (IG-IMRT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between May 2008 and December 2009, 47 men with prostate adenocarcinoma were treated with IG-IMRT using in-room computed tomography (CT). RESULTS: The median time to grade 2 LRT was 12 months (range=1-24 months). Two of 3 men who developed grade 2 LRT had received treatment for diabetes, and the other was receiving anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy (AC therapy). Their rectal wall V70 (the volume of rectal wall receiving 70 Gy) values were 12.6%, 13.0%, and 13.3%. Univariate analysis revealed that V70 of the rectal wall was the only significant risk factor for LRT (p=0.0073). CONCLUSION: No man with V70 ≤12.0% experienced grade 2 LRT. Strict rectal wall V70 ≤12% dose constraints should be considered when treating prostate cancer patients who are also receiving diabetic or AC therapy.

Safety and effectiveness of stereotactic body radiotherapy for a clinically diagnosed primary stage I lung cancer without pathological confirmation.

BACKGROUND: Pathological diagnosis fails in some pulmonary tumors, although they may be highly suspected to be primary lung cancer. We studied the outcome of stereotactic body radiotherapy for a clinically diagnosed primary stage I lung cancer without pathological confirmation. METHODS: The current study included 37 patients (39 lesions) treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy who were clinically diagnosed with primary stage I lung cancer between August 1998 and April 2009 at our hospital. Pulmonary tumors were highly suspected to be malignant from physical and imaging examinations. Biopsies were performed for 62 % of patients, although malignancy was not pathologically confirmed. In the other 38 % of patients, a biopsy was not feasible. Median age of the patients was 77 years. Median tumor diameter was 20 mm. A total median dose of 48 Gy was prescribed to the isocenter in four fractions. Median follow-up period was 39 months. RESULTS: The 3-year overall survival, local control, and regional-distant control were 74.2, 94.0, and 68.6 %, respectively. In patients with tumors ≤20 mm, overall survival and regional-distant control were significantly higher than in patients with tumors >20 mm (p ≤ 0.001), whereas no significant difference was observed regarding local control. No grade 3-5 adverse events possibly, probably, or definitely related to the treatment were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Stereotactic body radiotherapy is safe and effective for a clinically diagnosed primary stage I lung cancer when pathological diagnosis is difficult even with repeat biopsies, or a biopsy is not feasible for reasons of the patient's health condition or wishes.