An adjusted indirect comparison of everolimus and sorafenib therapy in sunitinib-refractory metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients using repeated matched samples.

OBJECTIVE: To date, no trial data exist comparing treatment outcomes for everolimus versus sorafenib. The current analysis indirectly compares the overall survival (OS) benefit of everolimus and sorafenib as second-line treatment options. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A single-arm sorafenib study is selected as a basis to match an everolimus sunitinib-refractory subpopulation of the RECORD-1 trial. Only patients with clear cell histology are included. An adjusted matching approach is taken where 1000 repeated random samples matched to the sorafenib population on risk score distribution are produced, and a 95% CI around the mean of all sampled median OS is generated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measures include adjusted median OS and progression-free survival. RESULTS: In all, 45 clear cell histology sorafenib patients and 1000 samples of N=41 sunitinib-refractory everolimus patients are considered for analysis. After adjusted matching, the estimated median OS benefit is 32.0 [corrected] weeks (95% CI: 22, 64) and 81.5 weeks (95% CI:78, 86) for sorafenib and everolimus patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that sunitinib-refractory metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with everolimus may experience significantly improved OS outcomes compared to those treated with sorafenib. However, because this is not a randomized controlled trial, the results should be interpreted as those from an observational study.

Healthcare charges in patients who transition from ocular hypertension to primary open-angle glaucoma based on ophthalmic coding data.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this research was to assess the impact of transition from ocular hypertension (OHT) to primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) on healthcare charges. METHODS: A case-control group was identified using PharMetrics claims database (1998-2005). Cases (n=1055) had a transition from OHT to POAG based on International Classification of Disease, Ninth Edition coding (ICD-9=365.11). Controls (n=2110) retained an ICD-9 code for OHT (ICD-9=365.04) and were matched to cases (2:1) on gender, age, diagnosis year, and follow-up time post-diagnosis. The index date marked the transition for cases and a date of similar duration after OHT diagnosis for controls. Conditional logistic regression and multiple linear regression models determined the impact of transitioning on healthcare charges. RESULTS: Cases had significantly higher increases in ophthalmology-related charges ($797 vs. -$385, P<0.0001) but similar total healthcare charges ($1689 vs. $1386, P=0.8277) from the year pre- to year post-index date when compared with controls. After adjusting for key covariates, cases were 1.56 times (95% CI: 1.33-1.82) more likely to have increased total charges and 5.26 times (95% CI: 4.27-6.47) more likely to have increased ophthalmology-related charges compared with controls. In multiple linear regression analyses, cases experienced $48 (55%) higher increases in ophthalmology-related charges from the year pre- to year post-index date compared with controls ($85 vs. $37, respectively; P<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Patients with a transition from OHT to POAG based on ICD-9 coding had higher ophthalmology-related charges the year after transition compared with patients who retained a code for OHT. Prevention of this transition could result in healthcare resource savings.

Healthcare charges in patients with glaucoma who undergo laser trabeculoplasty.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to assess the impact of laser trabeculoplasty (LTP) on healthcare charges in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). METHODS: Using a managed care database (PharMetrics; Watertown, MA, USA), we formed a case-control group nested within a POAG cohort (n=72,412) formed using International Classification of Disease, Ninth Edition (ICD-9) coding data. Cases (n=1145) had LTP (Current Procedural Terminology code: 65855) with ≥1 year of continuous enrollment both prior to, and following LTP index date in PharMetrics from 1998-2005. Using the date of LTP as the index date, controls (n=2290) without LTP were matched to cases on gender, age, and index year in a 2:1 ratio. Cases and controls had ≥6 months of continuous enrollment in PharMetrics prior to receiving a diagnosis of POAG (ICD-9 code: 365.11). One-year total and ophthalmology healthcare charges were calculated in the year pre- and post-index date (excluding charges for LTP at the index date). Conditional logistic regression models and multiple linear regression models determined the impact of LTP on healthcare charges, while controlling for glaucoma duration and other key covariates. RESULTS: While the mean age of cases (60.1±13.1 years) and controls (60.3±13.6 years) was similar (P=0.5589), cases had more comorbid systemic conditions (P<0.05) and underwent more cataract surgery in the year after index date (4.4% vs. 2.1%; P=0.002). In the year after index date, ophthalmology-related charges increased by $1364 for cases vs. $30 for controls (P=0.0003). Total healthcare charges increased by $5084 for cases and $1594 for controls in the year after index date (P=0.0085). Cases and controls experienced similar increases in ophthalmology-related pharmacy charges from the year pre- to the year post-index date ($26 vs. $43, P=0.385). In both logistic regression and linear regression models, which adjusted for several covariates, performing LTP was associated with increased total healthcare and ophthalmology-related charges. CONCLUSION: Among patients with POAG in this study, performing LTP was associated with increased total and ophthalmology-related healthcare charges, while ophthalmology pharmacy charges did not decline.