Comparison of daptomycin and glycopeptide efficacy and safety for the treatment of Gram-positive infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The indications of daptomycin have been extended to off-label indications including prosthesis-related infection, and bone and joint infection (BJI). However, efficacy and safety have not been thoroughly demonstrated compared with the standard of care. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the treatment effect of daptomycin and glycopeptides for complicated infections. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing daptomycin and standard of care for Gram-positive infections, published until 30 June 2021. The primary outcome was defined as all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were clinical and microbiological success. The main safety outcome was any severe adverse event (SAE) (grade  ≥3). RESULTS: Overall, eight RCTs were included in the meta-analysis, totalling 1095 patients. Six (75%) were in complicated skin and soft-structure infections, one (12.5%) in bacteraemia and one (12.5%) in a BJI setting. Six RCTs used vancomycin as a comparator and two used either vancomycin or teicoplanin. All-cause mortality and clinical cure were not different between groups. The microbiological cure rate was superior in patients who received daptomycin [risk ratio (RR) = 1.17 (95% CI: 1.01-1.35)]. The risk of SAEs [RR = 0.57 (95% CI: 0.36-0.90)] was lower in the daptomycin arm. CONCLUSIONS: While daptomycin is associated with a significantly lower risk of SAEs and a better microbiological eradication, substantial uncertainty remains about the best treatment strategy in the absence of good-quality evidence, especially in bacteraemia and endocarditis where further RCTs should be conducted.

Clinical, economic, and organizational impact of pharmacists' interventions in a cognitive-behavioral unit in France.

Objective Evaluate the clinical, economic, and organizational impact of pharmaceutical interventions performed during medication review in a cognitive-behavioral unit. Setting Study conducted in a cognitive-behavioral unit with retrospective data from January 2011 to june 2017. Methods This study was conducted from retrospective data of medication review in a cognitive-behavioral unit. During medication review, pharmacists identified relevant drug related problems lead to a pharmaceutical intervention which is submitted to the physician. All pharmaceutical interventions carried out from January 2011 to june 2017 were retrospectively analyzed to evaluate their clinical, economic and organizational impact using a multidimensional tool. Main outcome measure CLinical, Economic and Organizational impact using the CLEO tool. Results During the study period, 543 drug related problems and pharmaceutical interventions were recorded for patients hospitalized in the cognitive-behavioral unit (79.0 ± 9.5 years, 59% female). The most common types of drug related problems identified were 'non conformity to guidelines / contra-indication' (28.7%), 'drug without indication' (21.7%), and 'improper administration' (15.1%). The majority of pharmaceutical interventions were considered to have at least a clinical significant impact from the pharmacist's perspective (74%). Regarding the economic and organizational dimensions, 55.2% of pharmaceutical interventions would decrease the costs of care and 35.9% of pharmaceutical interventions would be favorable on the quality of care process. Conclusions The present study shows that the pharmacist may detect a high number of drug related problems with significant clinical relevance during medication review in a cognitive-behavioral unit. Describing and identifying significant pharmaceutical interventions in cognitive-behavioral unit patients allow us to better understand and improve clinical practice in this population.