Effect of a Novel, Orally Active Matrix Metalloproteinase-2 and -9 Inhibitor in Spinal and Trigeminal Rat Models of Neuropathic Pain.

AIMS: To study the effects of a novel matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) and MMP-9 inhibitor, AQU-118, on mechanical allodynia in the spinal nerve ligation (SNL) model of neuropathic pain and the chronic constriction injury of the infraorbital nerve (CCI-IoN) model of neuropathic orofacial pain. METHODS: Five groups of SNL rats were given daily oral doses of AQU-118 (5, 10, 20 mg/kg), gabapentin (100 mg/kg), or vehicle (0.5% methylcellulose) and then paw withdrawal threshold was measured with von Frey filaments (VF). Three groups of CCI-IoN rats were given daily oral doses of either AQU-118 (40 mg/kg), gabapentin (100 mg/kg), or vehicle (0.5% methylcellulose) and then mechanical allodynia was measured with facial VF and non-reflex-based orofacial stimulation test (OFST) assay. Naïve rats were also tested for the effect of AQU-118 (40 mg/kg) on basal sensitivity to mechanical stimulation/locomotive activity. RESULTS: Mechanical allodynia in SNL rats was attenuated by gabapentin (100 mg/kg) and AQU-118 (in a dose-dependent manner). Mechanical allodynia in CCI-IoN rats was also attenuated (in an equipotent manner) by both AQU-118 (40 mg/ kg) and gabapentin (100 mg/kg) as measured by both facial VF and OFST assay. Upon cessation of either AQU-118 or gabapentin, VF-related responses in both models and OFST assay times reverted to levels observed in vehicle-treated rats. No statistically significant change was observed in locomotive activity/paw withdrawal threshold by AQU-118 (40 mg/kg) in naïve rats. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrated that oral AQU-118 attenuates mechanical allodynia in both neuropathic pain models and with efficacies that mirror gabapentin at the 40 mg/kg dose used in the CCI-IoN model but without effect on basal sensitivity to mechanical stimulation/locomotive activity. These findings support a possible role for MMP-2/-9 in the etiology of neuropathic pain and also suggest that inhibition strategies represent a viable treatment option.

Comparison of the predictive validity of the mirror chamber and elevated plus maze tests in mice.

The mirror chamber (MC) is a putative test of anxiety-like behavior in mice, and is increasingly popular. Nonetheless, it is unclear whether the observed behaviors rely on the presence of mirrored panels. If so, it is unclear whether the behaviors are sensitive to clinically effective anxiolytics, and how the test compares to the elevated plus maze (EPM) in terms of predictive validity. The present studies assessed anxiety-like behaviors in different mouse strains in the MC using mirrored and non-mirrored panels, under variable lighting conditions. We also assessed the pharmacological validity of the MC and EPM tests, and the locomotor properties of active test compounds. Seven mouse strains exhibited different levels of anxiety-like behaviors in the MC, and differential sensitivity to panel and light conditions. DBA/2J mice appeared most sensitive to the mirrored, versus black or white, panels and were therefore used in pharmacological MC studies. The mGlu5 receptor antagonist MPEP significantly decreased anxiety-like behaviors, similar to an intermediate dose of the benzodiazepine diazepam. The benzodiazepines chlordiazepoxide and alprazolam and the 5HT(1A) partial agonist buspirone had no effects on anxiety-like behaviors in the MC. None of the MC effects of active test compounds were attributable to non-specific/locomotor effects. The antidepressants fluoxetine and venlafaxine increased anxiety-like behaviors in the MC. By contrast, the anxiolytic-like effects of chlordiazepoxide, diazepam and MPEP were revealed in the EPM in C57Bl6/J mice. In conclusion, the EPM test exhibits superior predictive validity compared to the MC test, despite the sensitivity of the MC to mouse strain differences.

Pharmacological characterization of harmaline-induced tremor activity in mice.

Harmaline-induced tremor in rodents is a model of essential tremor. We utilized a novel assay to quantify tremor activity in mice and found that tremor activity was dependent on harmaline dose. The first-line clinical essential tremor treatments propranolol, primidone and gabapentin and gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) significantly attenuated harmaline-induced tremor. The anticonvulsants valproate and carbamazepine and the mood stabilizer lithium suppressed harmaline-induced tremor. The gamma-amino-butyric acid (GABA) receptor subtype A receptor agonist muscimol attenuated harmaline-induced tremor. By contrast, the GABA(B) receptor agonist R-baclofen increased tremor at the lowest dose tested, but had no effects at higher doses. Administration of the non-competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists phencyclidine or 5R,10S-(+)-5-methyl-10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenzo(a,d)cyclohepten-5,10-imine hydrogen maleate (MK-801) attenuated harmaline-induced tremor. The competitive NMDA antagonist D-4-[(2E)-3-phosphono-2-propenyl]-2-piperazinecarboxylic acid (d-CPPene) dose-dependently blocked harmaline-induced tremor, as did the alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA) receptor antagonist 2,3-dioxo-6-nitro-1,2,3,4-tetrahydrobenzo[f]quinoxaline-7-sulfonamide disodium salt (NBQX). The metabotropic glutamate subtype 5 (mGlu5) receptor antagonist 6-methyl-2-(phenylethynyl)pyridine (MPEP) was inactive against tremor. The dopamine reuptake inhibitor GBR12909 and the dopamine D(1)/D(2) receptor agonist apomorphine attenuated harmaline-induced tremor. Follow-up studies indicated that dopamine D(2)/D(3) but not dopamine D(1) receptor activation likely mediates the effects of apomorphine and GBR12909. Administration of compounds with sedative side-effects had no effect on tremor activity. In summary, the present data confirm the pharmacological validity of harmaline-induced tremor in mice, quantified via a novel assay, as an animal model of essential tremor. Further, these data provide additional evidence for the roles of ionotropic glutamate, GABA(A) and dopamine D(2)/D(3) receptors in the neurobiology of harmaline-induced tremor.