RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Hyperglycaemia is common in critically ill patients, but blood glucose and insulin management may differ widely among intensive care units (ICUs). We aimed to describe insulin use practices and the resulting glycaemic control in French ICUs. We conducted a multicentre 1-day observational study on November 23, 2021, in 69 French ICUs. Adult patients hospitalized for an acute organ failure, severe infection or post-operative care were included. Data were recorded from midnight to 11:59 p.m. the day of the study by 4-h periods. RESULTS: Two ICUs declared to have no insulin protocol. There was a wide disparity in blood glucose targets between ICUs with 35 different target ranges recorded. In 893 included patients we collected 4823 blood glucose values whose distribution varied significantly across ICUs (P < 0.0001). We observed 1135 hyperglycaemias (> 1.8 g/L) in 402 (45.0%) patients, 35 hypoglycaemias (≤ 0.7 g/L) in 26 (2.9%) patients, and one instance of severe hypoglycaemia (≤ 0.4 g/L). Four hundred eight (45.7%) patients received either IV insulin (255 [62.5%]), subcutaneous (SC) insulin (126 [30.9%]), or both (27 [6.6%]). Among patients under protocolized intravenous (IV) insulin, 767/1681 (45.6%) of glycaemias were above the target range. Among patients receiving insulin, short- and long-acting SC insulin use were associated with higher counts of hyperglycaemias as assessed by multivariable negative binomial regression adjusted for the propensity to receive SC insulin: incidence rate ratio of 3.45 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.97-4.00) (P < 0.0001) and 3.58 (95% CI 2.84-4.52) (P < 0.0001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Practices regarding blood glucose management varied widely among French ICUs. Administration of short or long-acting SC insulin was not unusual and associated with more frequent hyperglycaemia. The protocolized insulin algorithms used failed to prevent hyperglycaemic events.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Several studies have suggested a link exists between L-thyroxine and the coagulation system, and, according to some drug interaction studies, L-thyroxine can potentiate the effect of warfarin. This study sought to assess whether thyroid hormone therapy could impact the risk of bleeding in patients receiving vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). METHODS: We conducted a monocentric, retrospective study on prospectively collected data from consecutive patients enrolled in the Registry of patient with AntiThrombotic agents admitted to an Emergency Department (RATED) database, and compared the hemorrhage rates (both major and nonmajor) of patients receiving treatment with and without L-thyroxine. Propensity score matching analysis was performed to reduce the differences between patients receiving L-thyroxine and those not receiving L-thyroxine in order to reassess bleeding outcomes in patients receiving VKAs. RESULTS: From January 2014 to June 2015, 1454 patients receiving VKAs were recruited into the RATED database. Overall, 187 patients (12.8%) received L-thyroxine. Patients receiving L-thyroxine were more likely to be female than those not receiving L-thyroxine (78.1 vs. 55%) and more likely to exhibit hypertension (65.5 vs. 55.7%; p = 0.015), but less likely to have history of myocardial infarction (9.6 vs. 16.6%; p = 0.022) or higher creatinine levels (96.1 vs. 112.1 µmol/L; p = 0.04). After propensity score matching, bleeding outcomes were not significantly different between patients receiving L-thyroxine and those not receiving L-thyroxine. CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed no evidence that L-thyroxine could increase bleeding risk in patients receiving VKAs. However, physicians must be aware that patients with thyroid disease receiving VKA therapy could have other drug interactions, particularly with amiodarone therapy. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV NUMBER: NCT02706080.
