Interplay of formulation and process methodology on the extent of nifedipine molecular dispersion in polymers.

The aim of this study is to evaluate effects of formulation and process technology on drug molecular dispersibility in solid dispersions (SDs). Nifedipine solid dispersions with ethylcellulose (EC) and/or Eudragit RL (RL) prepared by co-precipitation, co-evaporation, and fusion methods were characterized with FTIR, DSC, and XRPD for the content of nifedipine as molecular dispersion, amorphous and/or crystalline suspensions. A method was developed based on regular solution and Flory-Huggins theories to calculate drug-polymer interaction parameter in solid dispersion systems. A synergic effect of RL and EC on nifedipine molecular dispersibility in solid dispersions was observed. Increasing RL/EC ratio resulted in a higher degree of drug-polymer interaction that thermodynamically favored molecular dispersion, which, however, was counteracted by a corresponding decrease in the matrix glass transition point that kinetically favored phase-separation. Process methodology was found to play an important role in the formation of amorphous SD. The ranking of technologies with respect to the extent of molecular dispersion from high to low is fusion>co-evaporation>co-precipitation, wherein the solidification rate of polymeric solution and non-solvent effects were linked to kinetic entrapment of drug molecules in polymeric networks. Since nifedipine molecular dispersibility in EC/RL polymer(s) is a result of interplay between thermodynamic and kinetic factors, nifedipine molecular dispersions prepared for this study are thermodynamically metastable systems. To explore those supersaturation systems for use in drug delivery of poorly water soluble drugs, it is critical to balance drug-polymer interactions and matrix glass transition point and to consider a process technology with a fast solidification rate during formulation and process development of amorphous SD.

Summary workshop report: bioequivalence, biopharmaceutics classification system, and beyond.

The workshop "Bioequivalence, Biopharmaceutics Classification System, and Beyond" was held May 21-23, 2007 in North Bethesda, MD, USA. This workshop provided an opportunity for pharmaceutical scientists to discuss the FDA guidance on the Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS), bioequivalence of oral products, and related FDA initiatives such as the FDA Critical Path Initiative. The objective of this Summary Workshop Report is to document the main points from this workshop. Key highlights of the workshop were (a) the described granting of over a dozen BCS-based biowaivers by the FDA for Class I drugs whose formulations exhibit rapid dissolution, (b) continued scientific support for biowaivers for Class III compounds whose formulations exhibit very rapid dissolution, (c) scientific support for a number of permeability methodologies to assess BCS permeability class, (d) utilization of BCS in pharmaceutical research and development, and (e) scientific progress in in vitro dissolution methods to predict dosage form performance.

Improving the dissolution rate of poorly water soluble drug by solid dispersion and solid solution: pros and cons.

The solid dispersions with poloxamer 188 (P188) and solid solutions with polyvinylpyrrolidone K30 (PVPK30) were evaluated and compared in an effort to improve aqueous solubility and bioavailability of a model hydrophobic drug. All preparations were characterized by differential scanning calorimetry, powder X-ray diffraction, intrinsic dissolution rates, and contact angle measurements. Accelerated stability studies also were conducted to determine the effects of aging on the stability of various formulations. The selected solid dispersion and solid solution formulations were further evaluated in beagle dogs for in vivo testing. Solid dispersions were characterized to show that the drug retains its crystallinity and forms a two-phase system. Solid solutions were characterized to be an amorphous monophasic system with transition of crystalline drug to amorphous state. The evaluation of the intrinsic dissolution rates of various preparations indicated that the solid solutions have higher initial dissolution rates compared with solid dispersions. However, after storage at accelerated conditions, the dissolution rates of solid solutions were lower due to partial reversion to crystalline form. The drug in solid dispersion showed better bioavailability in comparison to solid solution. Therefore, considering physical stability and in vivo study results, the solid dispersion was the most suitable choice to improve dissolution rates and hence the bioavailability of the poorly water soluble drug.